Feature Importance Analysis for Postural Deformity Detection System Using Explainable Predictive Modeling Technique
Source abstract
Abstract
This study aimed to analyze feature importance by applying explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to postural deformity parameters extracted from a computer vision-based posture analysis system (CVPAS). Overall, 140 participants were screened for CVPAS and enrolled. The main data analyzed were shoulder height difference (SHD), wrist height difference (WHD), and pelvic height difference (PHD) extracted using a CVPAS. Standing X-ray imaging and radiographic assessments were performed. Predictive modeling was implemented with XGBoost, random forest regressor, and logistic regression using XAI techniques for global and local feature analyses. Correlation analysis was performed between radiographic assessment and AI evaluation for PHD, SHD, and Cobb angle. Main global features affecting scoliosis were analyzed in the order of importance for PHD (0.18) and ankle height difference (0.06) in predictive modeling. Outstanding local features were PHD, WHD, and KHD that predominantly contributed to the increase in the probability of scoliosis, and the prediction probability of scoliosis was 94%. When the PHD was >3 mm, the probability of scoliosis increased sharply to 85.3%. The paired t-test result for AI and radiographic assessments showed that the SHD, Cobb angle, and scoliosis probability were significant (p < 0.05). Feature importance analysis using XAI to postural deformity parameters extracted from a CVPAS is a useful clinical decision support system for the early detection of posture deformities. PHD was a major parameter for both global and local analyses, and 3 mm was a threshold for significantly increasing the probability of local interpretation of each participant and the prediction of postural deformation, which leads to the prediction of participant-specific scoliosis.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Medical Imaging and Analysis · Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment · Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Neurosurgery, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, College of Medicine, Goyang 10380, Korea
Neuroscience & Radiosurgery Hybrid Research Center, Inje University, Goyang 10380, Korea
Allbareun Neurosurgery Clinic, Incheon 21972, Korea
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. The transformation of spinal curvature into spinal deformity: Pathological processes and implications for treatment10.1186/1748-7161-1-3 ↗
2. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and back pain
3. (2009). Improvement of back pain with operative and nonoperative treatment in adults with scoliosis. Neurosurgery, 65, 86–94.10.1227/01.NEU.0000347005.35282.6C ↗
4. Evaluation of shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population and its correlation with radiological parameters10.1007/s00586-007-0546-0 ↗
5. Radiographic evaluation of scoliosis10.2214/AJR.07.7145 ↗
6. Risk factors for idiopathic scoliosis: Review of a 6-year prospective study10.3928/0147-7447-20000801-17 ↗
7. School screening and pelvic tilt scoliosis10.1016/S0140-6736(84)91059-6 ↗
8. Scoliosis imaging: An analysis of radiation risk in the CT scan projection radiograph and a comparison with projection radiography and EOS10.1016/j.radi.2019.02.005 ↗
9. Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Kinematics and electromyographic analysis10.1007/s00586-009-0899-7 ↗
10. Scoliosis screening through a machine learning based gait analysis test10.1007/s12541-018-0215-8 ↗
11. Alharbi, R.H., Alshaye, M.B., Alkanhal, M.M., Alharbi, N.M., Alzahrani, M.A., and Alrehaili, O.A. (2020, January 19–21). Deep Learning Based Algorithm For Automatic Scoliosis Angle Measurement. Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Computer Applications & Information Security (ICCAIS), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.10.1109/ICCAIS48893.2020.9096753 ↗
12. Machine Learning Predicts the 3D Outcomes of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery Using Patient–Surgeon Specific Parameters10.1097/BRS.0000000000003795 ↗
13. Image-based modelling for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Mechanistic machine learning analysis and prediction10.1016/j.cma.2020.113590 ↗
14. Development and validation of deep learning algorithms for scoliosis screening using back images10.1038/s42003-019-0635-8 ↗
15. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
16. Early detection of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents10.2106/JBJS.16.00224 ↗
17. XAI—Explainable artificial intelligence10.1126/scirobotics.aay7120 ↗
18. Xgboost: Extreme gradient boosting
19. Segal, M.R. (2004). Machine Learning Benchmarks and Random Forest Regression, Kluwer Academic Publisher.
20. A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004 ↗
21. Van den Broeck, G., Lykov, A., Schleich, M., and Suciu, D. (2020). On the tractability of SHAP explanations. arXiv.10.1609/aaai.v35i7.16806 ↗
22. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., and Guestrin, C. (2016). Model-agnostic interpretability of machine learning. arXiv.
23. An overview of clinical decision support, systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y ↗
24. Chen, K., Zhai, X., Sun, K., Wang, H., Yang, C., and Li, M. (2021). A narrative review of machine learning as promising revolution in clinical practice of scoliosis. Ann. Transl. Med., 9.10.21037/atm-20-5495 ↗
25. Liang, R., Yip, J., To, K.-T.M., and Fan, Y. (2021). Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Scoliosis. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-80744-3_15 ↗
26. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012 ↗
27. Visani, G., Bagli, E., Chesani, F., Poluzzi, A., and Capuzzo, D. (2020). Statistical stability indices for LIME: Obtaining reliable explanations for machine learning models. J. Oper. Res. Soc., 1–11.10.1080/01605682.2020.1865846 ↗
28. Deshpande, G., Ruhe, G., and Saunders, C. (2021). How Much Data Analytics is Enough? The ROI of Machine Learning Classification and its Application to Requirements Dependency Classification. arXiv.
29. Machine learning in neurosurgery: A global survey10.1007/s00701-020-04532-1 ↗
30. Abdollahi, B., Tomita, N., and Hassanpour, S. (2020). Data augmentation in training deep learning models for medical image analysis. Deep Learners and Deep Learner Descriptors for Medical Applications, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-42750-4_6 ↗