journal article·2021-12-30Open access

Optimized Cell Mixing Facilitates the Reproducible Bioprinting of Constructs with High Cell Viability

Axel Pössl, David Hartzke, Peggy Schlupp, Frank E. Runkel

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 1

Abstract

Bioprinting with cell-laden hydrogels (bioink) requires the careful mixing of cells with the hydrogel carrier to ensure that the bioink is homogeneous and functional, and the printing results are reproducible. Bioink preparation is therefore a critical process step that must accommodate the specific rheological properties of different bioinks. Here, we developed a reproducible method for the optimized mixing of cells and hydrogel carriers that can be integrated into current bioprinting processes. First, we tested and optimized different mixing devices for their effect on bioink homogeneity and rheological properties, resulting in a low-shear process for the preparation of homogenous bioinks. Based on these findings, we evaluated the impact of different cell densities on the rheological profile of bioinks according to shear and temperature, and estimated the impact of shear stress intensity and duration on 1.1B4 cells. Finally, we integrated the optimized mixing method into a current printing process and monitored the printed construct for 14 days to confirm cell viability. We found that the cell viability in the printed cell-laden constructs remained in excess of 91% after 14 days.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · Cell Image Analysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Life Science Engineering, Institute of Bioprocess Engineering and Pharmaceutical Technology, Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen—University of Applied Sciences, Wiesenstrasse 14, 35390 Giessen, Germany

Department of Biology and Chemistry, Justus Liebig University, Ludwigstrasse 23, 35390 Giessen, Germany

Department of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, Philipps University, Robert-Koch-Strasse 4, 35037 Marburg, Germany

Funding

Hessian State Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts · Technische Hochschule Mittelhessen publication fund

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Biofabrication: Reappraising the definition of an evolving field10.1088/1758-5090/8/1/013001 ↗
2. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine 2019: The role of biofabrication—A year in review10.1089/ten.tec.2019.0344 ↗
3. Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/032002 ↗
4. Assessment methodologies for extrusion-based bioink printability10.1088/1758-5090/ab6f0d ↗
5. 3D bioprinting human chondrocytes with nanocellulose-alginate bioink for cartilage tissue engineering applications10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00188 ↗
6. Characterization and printability of sodium alginate-gelatin hydrogel for bioprinting NSCLC co-culture10.1038/s41598-019-55034-9 ↗
7. 3D bioprinting of low-concentration cell-laden gelatin methacrylate (GelMA) bioinks with a two-step cross-linking strategy10.1021/acsami.7b16059 ↗
8. The shear stress of it all: The cell membrane and mechanochemical transduction10.1098/rstb.2007.2128 ↗
9. Hydrodynamic damage to animal cells10.1080/20013891081692 ↗
10. The 3D printing of gelatin methacrylamide cell-laden tissue-engineered constructs with high cell viability10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.078 ↗
11. High density cell seeding affects the rheology and printability of collagen bioinks10.1088/1758-5090/ab3524 ↗
12. A targeted rheological bioink development guideline and its systematic correlation with printing behavior10.1088/1758-5090/abde1e ↗
13. Bioprinting of cartilage and skin tissue analogs utilizing a novel passive mixing unit technique for bioink precellularization
14. ‘Living cantilever arrays’ for characterization of mass of single live cells in fluids10.1039/b803601b ↗
15. Pössl, A., Hartzke, D., Schlupp, P., and Runkel, F.E. (2021). Calculation of Mass Transfer and Cell-Specific Consumption Rates to Improve Cell Viability in Bioink Tissue Constructs. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14164387 ↗
16. Stabilized stress-velocity-pressure finite element formulations of the Navier–Stokes problem for fluids with non-linear viscosity10.1016/j.cma.2014.07.003 ↗
17. Enzymatic detachment of therapeutic mesenchymal stromal cells grown on glass carriers in a bioreactor10.2174/1874120701307010147 ↗
18. The bioink: A comprehensive review on bioprintable materials10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006 ↗
19. Yield stress determines bioprintability of hydrogels based on gelatin-methacryloyl and gellan gum for cartilage bioprinting10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035003 ↗
20. Performance of Kenics static mixer over a wide range of Reynolds number10.1016/j.cej.2007.07.101 ↗
21. Increased mixing improves hydrogel homogeneity and quality of three-dimensional printed constructs10.1089/ten.tec.2010.0093 ↗
22. Sedimentation study of bioink containing living cells10.1063/1.5089245 ↗
23. Quantitative criteria to benchmark new and existing bio-inks for cell compatibility10.1088/1758-5090/aa869f ↗
24. Müller, S.J., Mirzahossein, E., Iftekhar, E.N., Bächer, C., Schrüfer, S., Schubert, D.W., Fabry, B., and Gekle, S. (2020). Flow and hydrodynamic shear stress inside a printing needle during biofabrication. PLoS ONE, 15.10.1371/journal.pone.0236371 ↗
25. Injectable solid peptide hydrogel as a cell carrier: Effects of shear flow on hydrogels and cell payload10.1021/la2041746 ↗
26. Rheology, simulation and data analysis toward bioprinting cell viability awareness10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00119 ↗
27. Tuning alginate-gelatin bioink properties by varying solvent and their impact on stem cell behavior10.1038/s41598-018-26407-3 ↗
28. Panwar, A., and Tan, L.P. (2016). Current status of bioinks for micro-extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Molecules, 21.10.3390/molecules21060685 ↗
29. Controlling shear stress in 3D bioprinting is a key factor to balance printing resolution and stem cell integrity10.1002/adhm.201500677 ↗
30. Characterization of cell viability during bioprinting processes
31. The influence of printing parameters on cell survival rate and printability in microextrusion-based 3D cell printing technology10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045002 ↗
32. Three-dimensional bioreactor technologies for the cocultivation of human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells and beta cells10.1155/2018/2547098 ↗