journal article·2021-12-10Open access

Continuous Mobile User Authentication Using Combined Biometric Traits

Dominik Reichinger, Erik Sonnleitner, Marc Kurz

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 24

Abstract

Current state of the art authentication systems for mobile devices primarily rely on single point of entry authentication which imposes several flaws. For example, an attacker obtaining an unlocked device can potentially use and exploit it until the screen gets locked again. With continuous mobile user authentication, a system is embedded into the mobile devices, which continuously monitors biometric features of the person using the device, to validate if those monitored inputs match and therefore were made by the previously authenticated user. We start by giving an introduction towards the state of the art of currently used authentication systems and address related problems. For our main contribution we then propose, implement and discuss a continuous user authentication system for the Android ecosystem, which continuously monitors and records touch, accelerometer and timestamp data, and run experiments to gather data from multiple subjects. After feature extraction and normalization, a Hidden Markov Model is employed using an unsupervised learning approach as classifier and integrated into the Android application for further system evaluation and experimentation. The final model achieves an Area Under Curve of up to 100% while maintaining an Equal Error Rate of 1.34%. This is done by combining position and accelerometer data using gestures with at least 50 data points and averaging the prediction result of 25 consecutive gestures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: User Authentication and Security Systems · Biometric Identification and Security · Advanced Malware Detection Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department for Mobility & Energy, Hagenberg Campus, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, 4232 Hagenberg, Austria

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Feng, T., Liu, Z., Kwon, K.A., Shi, W., Carbunar, B., Jiang, Y., and Nguyen, N. (2012, January 13–15). Continuous mobile authentication using touchscreen gestures. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST), Waltham, MA, USA.10.1109/THS.2012.6459891 ↗
2. Newzoo (2021, October 10). Number of smartphone users worldwide from 2016 to 2021. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/330695/number-of-smartphone-users-worldwide/.
3. Silver, L., and Cornibert, S. (2019). Smartphone Ownership Is Growing Rapidly Around the World, but Not Always Equally, Pew Research Center.
4. Gascon, H., Uellenbeck, S., Wolf, C., and Rieck, K. (2014). Continuous authentication on mobile devices by analysis of typing motion behavior. Sicherheit 2014–Sicherheit, Schutz und Zuverlässigkeit, Gesellschaft für Informatik.
5. Ye, G., Tang, Z., Fang, D., Chen, X., Kim, K., Taylor, B., and Wang, Z. (March, January 26). Cracking Android Pattern Lock in Five Attempts. Proceedings of the 2017 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium 2017 (NDSS 17), San Diego, CA, USA.10.14722/ndss.2017.23130 ↗
6. Mainenti, D. (2021, October 12). User Perceptions of Apple’s Face ID. In Information Science, Human Computer Interaction (DIS805). Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321795099_User_Perceptions_of_Apple.
7. Altinok, A., and Turk, M. (2003, January 11–12). Temporal integration for continuous multimodal biometrics. Proceedings of the Workshop on Multimodal User Authentication, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
8. Taigman, Y., Yang, M., Ranzato, M., and Wolf, L. (2014, January 23–28). Deepface: Closing the gap to human-level performance in face verification. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, OH, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2014.220 ↗
9. Facing the future: The impact of Apple FaceID10.1016/S0969-4765(18)30010-9 ↗
10. Authentication of users on mobile telephones—A survey of attitudes and practices10.1016/j.cose.2005.08.003 ↗
11. Bojinov, H., and Boneh, D. (2011, January 1–2). Mobile token-based authentication on a budget. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Phoenix, AZ, USA.10.1145/2184489.2184494 ↗
12. Matyas, V., and Riha, Z. (2010, January 8–10). Security of Biometric Authentication Systems. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, CISIM 2010, Krakow, Poland.10.1109/CISIM.2010.5643698 ↗
13. Office, H. (2014). Reducing Mobile Phone Theft and Improving Security, U.K. Home Office.
14. Tapellini, D. (2021, October 12). Smart Phone Thefts Rose to 3.1 Million in 2013. Available online: https://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/04/smart-phone-thefts-rose-to-3-1-million-last-year/index.htm.
15. Muslukhov, I., Boshmaf, Y., Kuo, C., Lester, J., and Beznosov, K. (2013, January 27–30). Know your enemy: The risk of unauthorized access in smartphones by insiders. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Munich, Germany.10.1145/2493190.2493223 ↗
16. TrendForce (2018). Breakthrough for In-Display Fingerprint Sensor Will Raise Penetration of Fingerprint Recognition in Smartphone Market to 60% in 2018, Says TrendForce, TrendForce.
17. Comparing passwords, tokens, and biometrics for user authentication10.1109/JPROC.2003.819611 ↗
18. Statista (2020). Mobile Operating Systems’ Market Share Worldwide from January 2012 to December 2019, Statista.
19. Gartner (2014). Designing an Adaptive Security Architecture for Protection From Advanced Attacks, Gartner.
20. Panetta, K. (2017). The Gartner IT Security Approach for the Digital Age, Gartner.
21. Marko, K. (2019). Upping Enterprise Security with Continuous Authentication, Diginomica.
22. Gordon, D. (2018). Gartner Pushes Focus on Continuous Authentication for 2019, Gartner.
23. Continuous user authentication on mobile devices: Recent progress and remaining challenges10.1109/MSP.2016.2555335 ↗
24. Abuhamad, M., Abusnaina, A., Nyang, D., and Mohaisen, D. (2020). Sensor-based Continuous Authentication of Smartphones’ Users Using Behavioral Biometrics: A Survey. arXiv.10.1109/JIOT.2020.3020076 ↗
25. Rauen, Z.I., Anjomshoa, F., and Kantarci, B. (November, January 28). Gesture and Sociability-Based Continuous Authentication on Smart Mobile Devices. Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access (MobiWac’18), Montreal, QC, Canada.
26. Touchalytics: On the Applicability of Touchscreen Input as a Behavioral Biometric for Continuous Authentication10.1109/TIFS.2012.2225048 ↗
27. Zhang, D., Zhou, L., and Pisupati, S. (2019, January 15–17). Tracing One’s Touches: Continuous Mobile User Authentication Based on Touch Dynamics. Proceedings of the AMCIS 2019 Proceedings, Cancun, Mexico.
28. Roy, A., Halevi, T., and Memon, N.D. (2014, January 4–9). An HMM-based behavior modeling approach for continuous mobile authentication. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Florence, Italy.10.1109/ICASSP.2014.6854310 ↗
29. Roy, A., Halevi, T., and Memon, N. (2015, January 26–28). An HMM-based multi-sensor approach for continuous mobile authentication. Proceedings of the MILCOM 2015—2015 IEEE Military Communications Conference, Tampa, FL, USA.10.1109/MILCOM.2015.7357626 ↗
30. An introduction to hidden Markov models10.1109/MASSP.1986.1165342 ↗
31. Evolving the structure of Hidden Markov Models
32. Wunsch, H. (2001). Der Baum-Welch Algorithmus für Hidden Markov Models, ein Spezialfall des EM-Algorithmus. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Tübingen].
33. McLachlan, G.J., and Krishnan, T. (2007). The EM Algorithm and Extensions, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470191613 ↗
34. Jurafsky, D., and Martin, J.H. (2019). Speech and Language Processing—An Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition, Prentice Hall. Chapter Hidden Markov Models.
35. Ling, C.X., Huang, J., and Zhang, H. (2003, January 11–13). AUC: A better measure than accuracy in comparing learning algorithms. Proceedings of the Conference of the Canadian society for Computational Studies of Intelligence, Halifax, NS, Canada.10.1007/3-540-44886-1_25 ↗