journal article·2021-11-25Open access

Numerical Simulation-Based Investigation of the Limits of Different Quasistatic Models

Houssein Taha, Zuqi Tang, Thomas Henneron, Yvonnick Le Menach, Florentin Salomez, Jean-Pierre Ducreux

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 23

Abstract

The modeling of the capacitive phenomena, including the inductive effects becomes critical, especially in the case of a power converter with high switching frequencies, supplying an electrical device. At a low frequency, the electro-quasistatic (EQS) model is widely used to study the coupled resistive-capacitive effects, while the magneto-quasistatic (MQS) model is used to describe the coupled resistive-inductive effects. When the frequency increases, the Darwin model is preferred, which is able to capture the coupled resistive-capacitive-inductive effects by neglecting the radiation effects. In this work, we are interested in specifying the limits of these models, by investigating the influence of the frequency on the electromagnetic field distributions and the impedance of electromagnetic devices. Two different examples are carried out. For the first one, to validate the Darwin model, the measurement results are provided for comparison with the simulation results, which shows a good agreement. For the second one, the simulation results from three different models are compared, for both the local field distributions and the global impedances. It is shown that the EQS model can be used as an indicator to know at which frequency the Darwin model should be applied.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods · Electromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression · Magnetic Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Univ. Lille, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, Centrale Lille, Junia, ULR2697-L2EP, 59000 Lille, France

EDF R&D, ERMES, 7 Boulevard Gaspard Monge, 91120 Palaiseau, France

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Haus, H., and Melcher, J. (1989). Electromagnetic Fields and Energy, Prentice Hall.
2. Full Wave Potential Formulation with Low-Frequency Stability Including Ohmic Losses10.1109/TMAG.2014.2362114 ↗
3. Maki-Ontto, P., and Luomi, J. (2005, January 15). Induction motor model for the analysis of capacitive and induced shaft voltages. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Electric Machines and Drives, San Antonio, TX, USA.10.1109/IEMDC.2005.195941 ↗
4. Electro-quasistatic field simulations based on a discrete electromagnetism formulation10.1109/TMAG.2006.872488 ↗
5. Design of ZnO microvaristor material stress-cone for cable accessories10.1109/TDEI.2011.5976125 ↗
6. A Robust Maxwell Formulation for All Frequencies10.1109/TMAG.2007.915991 ↗
7. Hierarchical Matrix Preconditioning for Low-Frequency-Full-Maxwell Simulations10.1109/JPROC.2012.2204849 ↗
8. Electromagnetics from a quasistatic perspective10.1119/1.2397095 ↗
9. A Low-Frequency Approximation to the Maxwell Equations Simultaneously Considering Inductive and Capacitive Phenomena10.1109/TMAG.2011.2173163 ↗
10. A Symmetric Low-Frequency Stable Broadband Maxwell Formulation for Industrial Applications10.1137/16M1077817 ↗
11. A Novel Gauged Potential Formulation for 3-D Electromagnetic Field Analysis Including Both Inductive and Capacitive Effects
12. Clemens, M., Kähne, B., and Schöps, S. (2019, January 23–25). A Darwin Time Domain Scheme for the Simulation of Transient Quasistatic Electromagnetic Fields Including Resistive, Capacitive and Inductive Effects. Proceedings of the 2019 Kleinheubach Conference, Miltenberg, Germany.
13. Different types of quasistationary formulations for time domain simulations10.1029/2010RS004637 ↗
14. Rapetti, F., and Rousseaux, G. (2011, January 11–14). Implications of Galilean electromagnetism in numerical modeling. Proceedings of the IET 8th International Conference on Computation in Electromagnetics (CEM 2011), Wroclaw, Poland.10.1049/cp.2011.0062 ↗
15. Galilean electromagnetism10.1007/BF02895715 ↗
16. Magnetostatic field computation in terms of two-component vector potentials10.1002/nme.1620290305 ↗
17. Cortes Garcia, I., Schöps, S., De Gersem, H., and Baumanns, S. (2018). Systems of Differential Algebraic Equations in Computational Electromagnetics. Differential-Algebraic Equations Forum, Springer.10.1007/11221_2018_8 ↗
18. Kruger, S.E. (2019). The Three Quasistatic Limits of the Maxwell Equations. arXiv.
19. Bi-CGSTAB: A Fast and Smoothly Converging Variant of Bi-CG for the Solution of Nonsymmetric Linear Systems10.1137/0913035 ↗
20. Steinmetz, T., Kurz, S., and Clemens, M. (2009, January 22–24). Domains of Validity of Quasistatic and Quasistationary Field Approximations. Proceedings of the VXV International Symposium on Theoretical Engineering, Lubeck, Germany.
21. Enhancing Quasi-Static Modeling: A Claim for Electric Field Computation10.1109/TMAG.2013.2238663 ↗