journal article·2026-03Open access

The effect of residual stress on the fracture toughness of Ti–6Al–4V produced by laser-based powder bed fusion

D. F. Louw, M. Neaves, T. H. Becker

International Journal of Fracture· Volume 250· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) imposes steep thermal gradients, resulting in distortion and the formation of significant residual stresses, which often precipitate in-situ cracking at support interfaces and sharp geometric features. To isolate their influence on structural integrity, we combined fracture mechanics testing with residual stress evaluation on as-built compact tension specimens printed in two orthogonal orientations. The experimentally measured apparent stress-intensity factor was deconvolved into mechanical and residual-stress components, yielding a residual-stress-free fracture toughness ( $${K}ICeff$$ ). Apparent fracture toughness ( $${K}IC)$$ ranged from 25 to 35 MPa m 1/2 , whereas $${K}ICeff$$ increased to 45–52 MPa m 1/2 . Residual stresses, therefore, depress the material’s residual-stress-free resistance by up to ~ 50% and accentuate orientation-dependent anisotropy. The framework presented offers a route for quantifying process-induced toughness degradation in LPBF alloys.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Becker T, Kumar P, Ramamurty U (2021) Fracture and fatigue in additively manufactured metals. Acta Mater 219:117240. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2021.11724010.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2021.117240 ↗
2. Becker TH, Dhansay NM, Haar GMT, Vanmeensel K (2020) Near-threshold fatigue crack growth rates of laser powder bed fusion produced Ti-6Al-4V. Acta Mater 197:269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.07.04910.1016/j.actamat.2020.07.049 ↗
3. Berto F, Lazzarin P (2014) Recent developments in brittle and quasi-brittle failure assessment of engineering materials by means of local approaches. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 75:1–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2013.11.00110.1016/j.mser.2013.11.001 ↗
4. Brown DW, Bernardin JD, Carpenter JS et al (2016) Neutron diffraction measurements of residual stress in additively manufactured stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 678:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.09.08610.1016/j.msea.2016.09.086 ↗
5. du Plessis A (2019) Effects of process parameters on porosity in laser powder bed fusion revealed by X-ray tomography. Addit Manuf 30:100871. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2019.10087110.1016/J.ADDMA.2019.100871 ↗
6. Erdogan F, Sih GC (1963) On the crack extension in plates under plane loading and transverse shear. J Basic Eng 85:519–525. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.365689710.1115/1.3656897 ↗
7. Froes FH (2015) Titanium: physical metallurgy, processing and applications. ASM International, Materials Park10.31399/asm.tb.tpmpa.9781627083188 ↗
8. Hill MR, Van Dalen JE, Prime MB (2011) Assessment of Residual Stress in Fracture Mechanics Coupons. In: ASME 2011 Pressure Vessels & Piping Division Conference10.1115/PVP2011-57768 ↗
9. Hill MR, Vandalen JE (2008) Evaluation of residual stress corrections to fracture toughness values. J ASTM Int. https://doi.org/10.1520/JAI10171310.1520/JAI101713 ↗
10. Kumar P, Prakash O, Ramamurty U (2018) Micro-and meso-structures and their influence on mechanical properties of selectively laser melted Ti-6Al-4V. Acta Mater 154:246–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.04410.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.044 ↗
11. Lei Y, Odowd NP, Webster GA (2000) Fracture mechanics analysis of a crack in a residual stress field. Int J Fract 106:195–21610.1023/A:1026574400858 ↗
12. Louw DF, Neaves M, McDuling C, Becker TH (2025) Fracture toughness of laser-based powder bed fusion produced Ti-6Al-4V. Mater Sci Eng A 931:148199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2025.14819910.1016/J.MSEA.2025.148199 ↗
13. Lütjering G, Williams JC (2003) Titanium. Springer, Berlin10.1007/978-3-540-71398-2 ↗
14. Mercelis P, Kruth JP (2006) Residual stresses in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid Prototyp J 12:254–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/1355254061070701310.1108/13552540610707013 ↗
15. Newman JC, Yamada Y, James MA (2010) Stress-intensity-factor equations for compact specimen subjected to concentrated forces. Eng Fract Mech 77:1025–1029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.01210.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.02.012 ↗
16. Parry L, Ashcroft IA, Wildman RD (2016) Understanding the effect of laser scan strategy on residual stress in selective laser melting through thermo-mechanical simulation. Addit Manuf 12:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADDMA.2016.05.01410.1016/J.ADDMA.2016.05.014 ↗
17. Prime MB, Dewald AT (2013) The contour method. In: Schajer GS (ed) Practical residual stress measurement methods. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp 109–13810.1002/9781118402832.ch5 ↗
18. Rangaswamy P, Griffith ML, Prime MB et al (2005) Residual stresses in LENS® components using neutron diffraction and contour method. Mater Sci Eng A 399:72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEA.2005.02.01910.1016/J.MSEA.2005.02.019 ↗
19. Schindler H-J, Cheng W, Finnie I (1997) Experimental determination of stress intensity factors due to residual stresses. Exp Mech 37:272–27710.1007/BF02317418 ↗
20. Sun J, Nitschke-Pagel T, Dilger K (2023) Generation and distribution mechanism of welding-induced residual stresses. J Mater Res Technol 27:3936–3954. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMRT.2023.10.25210.1016/J.JMRT.2023.10.252 ↗
21. Syed AK, Ahmad B, Guo H et al (2019) An experimental study of residual stress and direction-dependence of fatigue crack growth behaviour in as-built and stress-relieved selective-laser-melted Ti6Al4V. Mater Sci Eng A 755:246–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.04.02310.1016/j.msea.2019.04.023 ↗
22. Ter Haar GM, Becker TH (2021) Low temperature stress relief and martensitic decomposition in selective laser melting produced Ti6Al4V. Mater Des Process Commun 3:e138. https://doi.org/10.1002/MDP2.13810.1002/MDP2.138 ↗
23. Anderson TL (2017) Fracture mechanics fundamentals and applications, 4th edn. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group, New York10.1201/9781315370293 ↗
24. Vrancken B, Cain V, Knutsen R, Van Humbeeck J (2014) Residual stress via the contour method in compact tension specimens produced via selective laser melting. Scr Mater 87:29–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.05.01610.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.05.016 ↗
25. Wohlers TT, Campbell I, Caffrey T, et al (2018) Wohlers Report 2018: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry: Annual World Wide Progress Report
26. Yadroitsev I, Yadroitsava I (2015) Evaluation of residual stress in stainless steel 316L and Ti6Al4V samples produced by selective laser melting. Virtual Phys Prototyp 10:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2015.102604510.1080/17452759.2015.1026045 ↗
27. Zaeh MF, Branner G (2010) Investigations on residual stresses and deformations in selective laser melting. Prod Eng 4:35–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11740-009-0192-Y/FIGURES/1910.1007/S11740-009-0192-Y/FIGURES/19 ↗