journal article·2021-04-25Open access

A Study on Distance Measurement Module for Driving Vehicle Velocity Estimation in Multi-Lanes Using Drones

Kwan-Hyeong Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 9

Abstract

A method of estimating driving vehicle information usually uses a speed gun and a fixed speed camera. Estimating vehicle information using the speed gun has a high risk of traffic accidents by the operator and the fixed speed camera is not efficient in terms of installation cost and maintenance. The existing driving vehicle information estimation method can only measure each lane’s driving vehicle information, so it is impossible to measure multi-lanes simultaneously with a single measuring device. This study develops a distance measurement module that can acquire driving vehicle information in multi-lanes simultaneously with a single system using a drone. The distance measurement module is composed of two LiDAR sensors to detect the driving vehicle in one lane. The drone is located above the edge of the road and each LiDAR sensor emits the front/rear point of the road measuring point to detect the driving vehicle. The driving vehicle velocity is estimated by detecting the driving vehicle’s detection distance and transit time through radiation, with the drone LiDAR sensor placed at two measurement points on the road. The drone LiDAR sensor radiates two measuring points on the road and estimates the velocity based on driving vehicle’s detection distance and driving time. As an experiment, the velocity accuracy of the drone driving vehicle is compared with the speed gun measurement. The vehicle velocity RMSE for the first and second lanes using drones is 0.75 km/h and 1.3 km/h, respectively. The drone and the speed gun’s average error probabilities are 1.2% and 2.05% in the first and second lanes, respectively. The developed drone is more efficient than existing driving vehicle measurement equipment because it can acquire information on the driving vehicle in a dark environment and a person’s safety.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Internet of Things and Social Network Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of IT Convergence, Daejin University, Pocheon 1007, Korea

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Wang, J. (September, January 31). How to us the C/A code of GPS to detect the exospheric passive radar target. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Signal Processing, Beijing, China.
2. Joint detection and Tracking processing algorithm for target tracking in multiple radar system10.1109/JSEN.2015.2461435 ↗
3. Enhanced detection of Doppler-spread target for FMCW radar10.1109/TAES.2019.2925433 ↗
4. Dempsey, T.P., and Brooker, M.C. (May, January 30). An SPW computer simulation analysis of an RF signal detection system. Proceedings of the Tactical Communications Conference, Fort Wayne, IN, USA.
5. A downscaled faster-RCNN Framework for signal detection and time frequency localization in wideband RF systems10.1109/TWC.2020.2987990 ↗
6. Research of target detection and classification techniques using millimeter wave radar and vision sensors10.3390/rs13061064 ↗
7. Liu, H., Pi, W., and Zha, H. (2003, January 8–13). Motion detection for multiple moving targets by using an omnidirectional camera. Proceedings of the International Conference of Robotics, Intelligent System and Signal Processing, Changsha, China.
8. Escobar Villanueva, J.R., Iglesias Martinez, L., and Perez Montiel, J.I. (2019). DEM generation from fixed-wing UAV imaging and LiDAR-derived ground control points for flood estimations. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19143205 ↗
9. LIDAR and vision-based pedestrian detection system10.1002/rob.20312 ↗
10. Kim, B.H., Khan, D., Bohak, C., Kim, J.K., Choi, W., Lee, H.J., and Kim, M.Y. (2018, January 10–13). Lidar data generation fused with virtual targets and visualization for small drone detection system. Proceedings of the Technologies for Optical Countermeasures XV International Society for Optics and Photonics, Berlin, Germany.
11. Mirčeta, K., Bohak, C., Kim, B.H., Kim, M.Y., and Marolt, M. (2018, January 17–18). Drone segmentation and tracking in grounded sensor scanned LiDAR datasets. Proceedings of the Zbornik Sedemindvajsete Mednarodne Elektrotehniške in Računalniške Conference, Portorož, Slovenija.
12. Decision tree method to analyze the performance of lane support systems10.3390/su13020846 ↗
13. Autonomous, onboard vision-based trash and litter detection in low altitude aerial images collected by an unmanned aerial vehicle10.3390/rs13050965 ↗
14. Area-efficient vision-based feature tracker for autonomous hovering of unmanned aerial vehicle10.3390/electronics9101591 ↗
15. Assessment of DSM based on radiometric transformation of UAV data10.3390/s21051649 ↗
16. Object detection in UAV images via global density fused convolution Network10.3390/rs12193140 ↗
17. AGB estimation in a tropical mountain forest (TMF) by means of RGB and multispectral images using an unmanned aerial vehicle(UAV)10.3390/rs11121413 ↗
18. Autonomous obstacle avoidance vehicle using LIDAR and embedded system10.22214/ijraset.2020.6005 ↗
19. Laser and LIDAR in a system for visibility distance estimation in fog conditions10.3390/s20216322 ↗
20. Charles, B. (2012, January 24–26). Vehicle speed estimation from two images for LIDAR second assessment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Application, Rome, Italy.
21. Takashi, O., Hiroshi, S., Yasuhiro, S., Kiyokazu, T., and Katsuhiro, M. (2011, January 5–9). Pedestrian detection and tracking using in-vehicle Lidar for automotive application. Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Baden-Baden, Germany.
22. Vehicle Detection Based on Laser Radar
23. Moving vehicle detection and drone velocity estimation with a moving drone10.5391/IJFIS.2020.20.1.43 ↗
24. Wu, J., Xu, H., Tian, Y., Pi, R., and Yue, R. (2020). Vehicle detection under adverse weather from roadside LiDAR data. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20123433 ↗
25. Cao, S., Yu, Y., Guan, H., Peng, D., and Yan, W. (2019). Affine-Function Transformation-Based Object Matching for Vehicle Detection from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11141708 ↗
26. Lee, K.H. (2020). Improvement in target range estimation and the range resolution using drone. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9071136 ↗