Less is more: removing a single bond increases the toughness of elastic networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We investigate how the removal of a single bond affects the fracture behavior of triangular spring networks, whereby we systematically vary the position of the removed bond. Our simulations show that removing the bond has two contrasting effects on the fracture energy for initiation of crack propagation and on the fracture energy for failure of the entire network. A single missing bond can either lower or raise the initiation fracture energy, depending on its placement relative to the crack tip. In contrast, the failure fracture energy is always equal to or greater than that of a perfect network. For most initial placements of the missing bond, the crack path remains straight, and the increased failure fracture energy results from arrest at the point of maximum local fracture resistance. When the crack deviates from a straight path, we observe an even higher fracture energy, which we attribute primarily to crack bridging. This additional toughening mechanism becomes active only at low failure strains of the springs; at higher failure strains, the crack path tends to remain straight. Altogether, our results demonstrate that even a single bond removal can significantly enhance toughness, offering fundamental insights into the role of defects in polymer networks and informing the design of tough architected materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Alava MJ, Nukala PKVV, Zapperi S (2006) Statistical models of fracture. Advances in Physics 55(3–4):349–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/0001873030074151810.1080/00018730300741518 ↗
2. Arora A, Lin T-S, Olsen BD (2022) Coarse-grained simulations for fracture of polymer networks: stress versus topological inhomogeneities. Macromolecules 55(1):4–14. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.macromol.1c0168910.1021/acs.macromol.1c01689 ↗
3. Bitzek E, Koskinen P, Gähler F, Moseler M, Gumbsch P (2006) Structural relaxation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 97(17):170201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.17020110.1103/PhysRevLett.97.170201 ↗
4. Bower AF, Ortiz M (1991) A three-dimensional analysis of crack trapping and bridging by tough particles. J Mech Phys Solids 39(6):815–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(91)90026-K10.1016/0022-5096(91)90026-K ↗
5. Broedersz CP, Mao X, Lubensky TC, MacKintosh FC (2011) Criticality and isostaticity in fibre networks. Nature Phys 7(12):983–988. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys212710.1038/nphys2127 ↗
6. Charles Y, Hild F (2002) On crack arrest in ceramic / metal assemblies. Int J Fract 115(3):251–272. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101639991203110.1023/A:1016399912031 ↗
7. Curtin WA, Futamura K (1990) Microcrack toughening? Acta Metall Mater 38(11):2051–2058. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7151(90)90072-O10.1016/0956-7151(90)90072-O ↗
8. Curtin WA, Scher H (1990) Brittle fracture in disordered materials: a spring network model. J Mater Res 5(3):535–553. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1990.053510.1557/JMR.1990.0535 ↗
9. de Waal L, Chouzouris M, Dias MA (October 2024) Architecting mechanisms of damage in topological metamaterial10.2139/ssrn.5050204 ↗
10. Deng B, Wang S, Hartquist C, Zhao X (2023) Nonlocal intrinsic fracture energy of polymerlike networks. Phys Rev Lett 131(22):228102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.22810210.1103/PhysRevLett.131.228102 ↗
11. Dussi S, Tauber J, Gucht J (2020) Athermal fracture of elastic networks: how rigidity challenges the unavoidable size-induced brittleness. Phys Rev Lett 124(1):018002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.01800210.1103/PhysRevLett.124.018002 ↗
12. Evans AG, Cannon RM (1986) Toughening of brittle solids by martensitic transformations. Acta Metall.; (United States) 34:5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(86)90052-010.1016/0001-6160(86)90052-0 ↗
13. Evans AG, Faber KT (1981) Toughening of ceramics by circumferential microcracking. J Am Ceram Soc 64(7):394–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb09877.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1981.tb09877.x ↗
14. Faber KT, Evans AG (1983) Crack deflection processes–I. Theory. Acta Metallurgica 31(4):565–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(83)90046-910.1016/0001-6160(83)90046-9 ↗
15. Faber KT, Evans AG (1983) Crack deflection processes–ii. Experiment Acta Metallurgica 31(4):577–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(83)90047-010.1016/0001-6160(83)90047-0 ↗
16. Griffith AA, Taylor GI (1920) VI. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character 221(582–593):582–593. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1921.000610.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
17. Guénolé J, Nöhring WG, Vaid A, Houllé F, Xie Z, Prakash A, Bitzek E (2020) Assessment and optimization of the fast inertial relaxation engine (fire) for energy minimization in atomistic simulations and its implementation in lammps. Comput Mater Sci 175:109584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2020.10958410.1016/j.commatsci.2020.109584 ↗
18. Hartquist CM, Wang S, Deng B, Beech HK, Craig SL, Olsen BD, Rubinstein M, Zhao X (2024) Fracture of polymer-like networks with hybrid bond strengths. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, page 105931, ISSN 0022-5096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2024.10593110.1016/j.jmps.2024.105931 ↗
19. Hartquist C, Wang S, Cui Q, Matusik W, Deng B, Zhao X (2025) Scaling law for intrinsic fracture energy of diverse stretchable networks. Phys Rev X 15(1):011002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.15.01100210.1103/PhysRevX.15.011002 ↗
20. Hossain MZ, Hsueh CJ, Bourdin B, Bhattacharya K (2014) Effective toughness of heterogeneous media. J Mech Phys Solids 71:15–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2014.06.00210.1016/j.jmps.2014.06.002 ↗
21. Hutchinson JW (1987) Crack tip shielding by micro-cracking in brittle solids. Acta Metallurgica 35(7):1605–1619. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(87)90108-810.1016/0001-6160(87)90108-8 ↗
22. Kendall K, Howard CA (1975) Control of cracks by interfaces in composites. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 341(1627):409–428. 10/bn3htd10.1098/rspa.1975.0001 ↗
23. Kermode JR, Albaret T, Sherman D, Bernstein N, Gumbsch P, Payne MC, Csányi G, De Vita A (2008) Low-speed fracture instabilities in a brittle crystal. Nature 455(7217):1224–1227. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0729710.1038/nature07297 ↗
24. Kreher W, Pompe W (1981) Increased fracture toughness of ceramics by energy-dissipative mechanisms. J Mater Sci 16(3):694–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0240278710.1007/BF02402787 ↗
25. Leguillon D, Piat R (2008) Fracture of porous materials - influence of the pore size. Eng Fract Mech 75(7):1840–1853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.00210.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.002 ↗
26. Leyou Zhang D, Rocklin Z, Sander LM, Mao X (2017) Fiber networks below the isostatic point: Fracture without stress concentration. Phys. Rev. Mater. 1(5):052602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.05260210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.052602 ↗
27. Lingua A, Sanner A, Hild F, Kammer DS (April 2025) Breaking better: Imperfections increase fracture resistance in architected lattices
28. Long R, Hui C-Y (2016) Fracture toughness of hydrogels: measurement and interpretation. Soft Matter 12(39):8069–8086. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SM01694D10.1039/C6SM01694D ↗
29. Ma X, Hajarolasvadi S, Albertini G, Kammer DS, Elbanna AE (2019) A hybrid finite element-spectral boundary integral approach: Applications to dynamic rupture modeling in unbounded domains. Num Anal Meth Geomechanics 43(1):317–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2865. (1096-9853)10.1002/nag.2865 ↗
30. Mirkhalaf M, Khayer Dastjerdi A, Barthelat F (2014) Overcoming the brittleness of glass through bio-inspiration and micro-architecture. Nat Commun 5(1):3166. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms416610.1038/ncomms4166 ↗
31. Najmul Abid J, Pro W, Barthelat F (2019) Fracture mechanics of nacre-like materials using discrete-element models: Effects of microstructure, interfaces and randomness. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 124:350–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.10.01210.1016/j.jmps.2018.10.012 ↗
32. Pastewka L, Sharp TA, Robbins MO (2012) Seamless elastic boundaries for atomistic calculations. Phys. Rev. B 86:075459. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.07545910.1103/PhysRevB.86.075459 ↗
33. Persson BNJ, Tosatti E (2001) The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic solids. J Chem Phys 115(12):5597. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.139830010.1063/1.1398300 ↗
34. Rivlin RS, Thomas AG (1953) Rupture of rubber. I. Characteristic energy for tearing. Journal of Polymer Science 10(3):291–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1953.12010030310.1002/pol.1953.120100303 ↗
35. Rose LRF (1986) Effective fracture toughness of microcracked materials. J Am Ceram Soc 69(3):212–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1986.tb07409.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1986.tb07409.x ↗
36. Shekhawat A, Zapperi S, Sethna JP (2013) From damage percolation to crack nucleation through finite size criticality. Phys Rev Lett 110(18):185505. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.18550510.1103/PhysRevLett.110.185505 ↗
37. Shum DKM, Hutchinson JW (1990) On toughening by microcracks. Mechanics of Materials 9(2):83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(90)90032-B10.1016/0167-6636(90)90032-B ↗
38. Sinclair JE (1975) The influence of the interatomic force law and of kinks on the propagation of brittle cracks. The Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics 31(3):647–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478643750822654410.1080/14786437508226544 ↗
39. Sugimura A, Asai M, Matsunaga T, Akagi Y, Sakai T, Noguchi H, Shibayama M (2013) Mechanical properties of a polymer network of Tetra-PEG gel. Polym J 45(3):300–306. https://doi.org/10.1038/pj.2012.14910.1038/pj.2012.149 ↗
40. Tankasala HC, Fleck NA (2020) The crack growth resistance of an elastoplastic lattice. International Journal of Solids and Structures 188–189:233–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.10.00710.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.10.007 ↗
41. Tauber J, van der Gucht J, Dussi S (2022) Stretchy and disordered: toward understanding fracture in soft network materials via mesoscopic computer simulations. J Chem Phys 156(16):160901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.008131610.1063/5.0081316 ↗
42. Thompson AP, Aktulga HM, Berger R, Bolintineanu DS, Brown WM, Crozier PS, in ’t Veld PJ, Kohlmeyer A, Moore SG, Nguyen TD, Shan R, Stevens MJ, Tranchida J, Trott C, Plimpton SJ (February 2022) LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Computer Physics Communications, 271: 108171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10817110.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
43. Thomson R, Hsieh C, Rana V (1971) Lattice Trapping of Fracture Cracks. Journal of Applied Physics 42(8):3154–3160. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166069910.1063/1.1660699 ↗
44. Urabe C, Takesue S (2010) Fracture toughness and maximum stress in a disordered lattice system. Phys Rev E 82(1):016106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.01610610.1103/PhysRevE.82.016106 ↗