journal article·2021-10-24Open access

Revising of the Near Ground Helicopter Hover: The Effect of Ground Boundary Layer Development

Theologos Andronikos, George Papadakis, Vasilis Riziotis, Spyros Voutsinas

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 21

Abstract

The interaction of a helicopter rotor with the ground in hover flight is addressed numerically using a hybrid Eulerian–Lagrangian CFD model. When a helicopter takes off or lands, its wake interferes with the ground. This interaction, depending on the height-to-rotor diameter ratio, causes the altering of the rotor loading and performance as compared to the unconstrained case and gives rise to the development of a complex outwash flow field in the surrounding of the helicopter. The present study aims to characterize the interactional phenomena occurring in the early stages of the rotor wake development and in particular the interference of the starting vortex with the ground boundary layer and the effect of this interaction in the motion of the vortex in the rotor outwash flow. The hybrid CFD method employed combines a standard URANS compressible finite volume solver, the use of which is restricted to confined grids around solid bodies, and a Lagrangian approximation of the entire flow field in which conservation equations are solved in their material form, disctretized using particle representation of the flow quantities. The two methods are strongly coupled to each other through an appropriate iterative scheme. The main advantage of the proposed methodology is that it can conveniently handle complex configurations with several bodies that move independently from one another, with affordable computational cost. In this paper, thrust coefficient predictions of the hybrid model are compared to predictions of a free wake code and to experimental data indicating that consistent prediction of the rotor load requires the inclusion of the ground boundary layer in the analysis. Moreover, detailed comparisons of the rotor wake evolution predicted by the hybrid model are presented.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Fluid Mechanics, School of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), Ir. Politechniou 9, 15780 Zografou, Greece

Department of Naval and Marine Hydrodynamics, School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), Ir. Politechniou 9, 15780 Zografou, Greece

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Key, D. (1999, January 14–16). Analysis of army helicopter pilot error mishap data and the implications for handling qualities. Proceedings of the 25th European Rotorcraft Forum, Rome, Italy.
2. Rotor Aerodynamics in Ground Effect At Low Advance Ratios10.4050/JAHS.29.48 ↗
3. Boer, J., Hermans, C., and Pengel, K. (2001). Helicopter Ground Vortex: Comparison of Numerical Predictions with Wind Tunnel Measurement, National Aerospace Laboratory NLR.
4. Ganesh, B., and Komerath, N. (2005, January 10–13). Unsteady Aerodynamics of Rotorcraft in Ground Effect. Proceedings of the Fluid Dynamics Meeting, Reno, NV, USA.10.2514/6.2005-1407 ↗
5. The flow around a model helicopter main rotor in ground effect10.1007/s00348-011-1212-1 ↗
6. Numerical Simulations and Measurements of the Helicopter Wake in Ground Effect10.2514/1.C033665 ↗
7. Sugiura, M., Tanabe, Y., Sugawara, H., Barakos, G., Matayoshi, N., and Ishii, H. (2017, January 12–15). Validation of Cfd Codes for the Helicopter Wake in Ground Effect. Proceedings of the European Rotorcraft Forum, Milan, Italy.
8. Cavallo, S., Ducci, G., Barakos, G., and Gibertini, G. (2018, January 18–21). CFD Analysis of Helicopter Wakes in Ground effect. Proceedings of the European Rotorcraft Forum, Delft, The Netherlands.
9. Numerical-experimental correlation of hovering rotor aerodynamics in ground effect10.1016/j.ast.2020.106079 ↗
10. Visingardi, A., De Gregorio, F., Schwarz, T., Schmid, M., Bakker, R., Voutsinas, S., Gallas, Q., Boisard, R., Gibertini, G., and Zagaglia, D. (2017, January 12–15). Forces on obstacles in rotor wake—A GARTEUR action group. Proceedings of the 43rd European Rotorcraft Forum, Milan, Italy.
11. Experimental investigation on the aerodynamic interaction between a helicopter and ground obstacles10.1177/0954410014550501 ↗
12. Rotor-obstacle aerodynamic interaction in hovering flight: An experimental survey
13. Validation of a cost effective method for the rotor-obstacle interaction10.1016/j.ast.2021.106698 ↗
14. Vortex methods in aeronautics: How to make things work10.1080/10618560600566059 ↗
15. Schmid, M. (2017, January 12–15). Simulation of helicopter aerodynamics in the vicinity of an obstacle using a free wake panel method. Proceedings of the 43rd European Rotorcraft Forum, CEAS, Milan, Italy.
16. Papadakis, G. (2014). Development of a Hybrid Compressible Vortex Particle Method and Application to External Problems Including Helicopter Flows. [Doctoral Dissertation, National Technical University of Athens].
17. A strongly coupled Eulerian Lagrangian method verified in 2D external compressible flows10.1016/j.compfluid.2019.104325 ↗
18. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5 ↗
19. Venkatakrishnan, V. (1993, January 11–14). On the Accuracy of Limiters and Convergence to Steady State Solutions. Proceedings of the On the Accuracy of Limiters and Convergence to Steady State Solutions, Reno, NV, USA.10.2514/6.1993-880 ↗
20. Spalart, P., and Allmaras, S. (1994). One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows. Rech. Aerosp., 5–21.
21. Menter, F. (1993, January 6–9). Zonal Two Equation k-omega Turbulence Models for Aerodynamic Flows. Proceedings of the 23rd Fluid Dynamics, Plasmadynamics, and Lasers Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.10.2514/6.1993-2906 ↗
22. An analysis of numerical errors in large-eddy simulations of turbulence10.1006/jcph.1996.0088 ↗
23. Development of a fluid structure interaction tool based on an actuator line model10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052072 ↗
24. A coupled Navier–Stokes/Vortex–Panel solver for the numerical analysis of wind turbines10.1016/j.compfluid.2006.01.006 ↗
25. Large eddy simulations of the flow past wind turbines: Actuator line and disk modeling10.1002/we.1747 ↗
26. Jha, P., and Schmitz, S. (2018). Actuator curve embedding—An advanced actuator line model. J. Fluid Mech., 834.10.1017/jfm.2017.793 ↗
27. Numerical simulations of wake characteristics of a wind turbine in uniform inflow10.1002/we.345 ↗
28. Higher order accurate vortex methods with explicit velocity kernels10.1016/0021-9991(85)90176-7 ↗
29. Cottet, G.H., and Koumoutsakos, P. (2000). Vortex Methods: Theory and Practice, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511526442 ↗
30. Aeroelastic stability of idling wind turbines10.5194/wes-2-415-2017 ↗