journal article·2021-10-07Open access

Assessing Movement Quality in Youth Footballers: The Relationship between Hip and Lower Limb Movement Screen and Functional Movement Screen

Pawel Linek, Paul E. Muckelt, Damian Sikora, Nadine Booysen, Maria Stokes

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 19

Abstract

The Hip and Lower Limb Movement Screen (HLLMS) was developed to detect altered movement patterns and asymmetry specifically related to hip, pelvic, and lower limb movement control, as the other tools, such as the Functional Movement Screen (FMS), lacked focus on the hip and pelvic area. Both screening tools contain symmetrical and asymmetrical motor tasks which are based on observation of different aspects of each task performance. One motor task is in both screening tools. Therefore, they have some common features. The present study aimed to assess the relationship between the HLLMS and FMS performance in youth football players. The study included 41 elite male football (soccer) players (age: 15.6 ± 0.50 years), and the HLLMS and FMS scores were analyzed by assessing Spearman’s rank correlation. The FMS total score and the FMSMOVE were moderately correlated with the HLLMS total score (R = −0.54; −0.53, respectively). The FMS rotatory stability task was moderately correlated with the HLLMS small knee bend with the trunk rotation task (R = −0.50). The FMS deep squat task was moderately correlated with the HLLMS deep squat task (R = −0.46). The FMS hurdle step was weakly correlated with two of the HLLMS tasks: standing hip flexion (R = −0.37) and hip abduction with external rotation (R = −0.34). There were no other relationships found (p > 0.05). Out of the seven FMS tasks, only one asymmetrical (trunk rotary stability) and one symmetrical (deep squat) task were moderately related to the newly developed HLLMS tool contributing moderate relationship between the FMS total score and the HLLMS total score. Other FMS tasks were weakly or unrelated with the HLLMS. These findings indicate that these two screening tools mainly assess different aspects of movement quality in healthy youth football players.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sports injuries and prevention · Shoulder Injury and Treatment · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, Musculoskeletal Elastography and Ultrasonography Laboratory, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, 40-065 Katowice, Poland

School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK

Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis Research Versus Arthritis, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK

PROF-MED Rehabilitation Center Damian Sikora, 41-300 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland

Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Hip functions influence on knee dysfunction: A proximal link to a distal problem10.1123/jsr.18.1.33 ↗
2. Biomechanical measures of neuromuscular control and valgus loading of the knee predict anterior cruciate ligament injury risk in female athletes: A prospective study10.1177/0363546504269591 ↗
3. The influence of abnormal hip mechanics on knee injury: A biomechanical perspective10.2519/jospt.2010.3337 ↗
4. Use of clinical movement screening tests to predict injury in sport10.5312/wjo.v7.i4.202 ↗
5. Booysen, N., Wilson, D.A., Lewis, C.L., Warner, M.B., Gimpel, M., Mottram, S., Comerford, M., and Stokes, M. (2019). Assessing movement quality using the hip and lower limb movement screen: Development, reliability and potential applications. J. Musculoskelet. Res., 22.10.1142/S0218957719500088 ↗
6. Pre-participation screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function—Part 2
7. Pre-participation screening: The use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function—Part 1
8. Reliability, validity, and injury predictive value of the functional movement screen: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1177/0363546516641937 ↗
9. The interrater and intrarater reliability of the functional movement screen: A systematic review with meta-analysis10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.12.002 ↗
10. Do Functional Movement Screen (FMS) composite scores predict subsequent injury? A systematic review with meta-analysis10.1136/bjsports-2016-096938 ↗
11. Predicting sport and occupational lower extremity injury risk through movement quality screening: A systematic review10.1136/bjsports-2016-096760 ↗
12. Differences in kinematics and electromyographic activity between men and women during the single-legged squat10.1177/03635465030310032101 ↗
13. The influence of squat kinematics and cam morphology on acetabular stress10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.018 ↗
14. Increased hip stresses resulting from a cam deformity and decreased femoral neck-shaft angle during level walking10.1007/s11999-016-5038-2 ↗
15. Long-term effects of sport: Preventing and managing OA in the athlete10.1038/nrrheum.2012.119 ↗
16. Epidemiology of Hip and Groin Injuries in Collegiate Athletes in the United States10.1177/2325967118771676 ↗
17. Hip adductor muscle strength is reduced preceding and during the onset of groin pain in elite junior Australian football players10.1016/j.jsams.2009.03.007 ↗
18. Osteitis pubis and assessment of bone marrow edema at the pubic symphysis with MRI in an elite junior male soccer squad10.1097/00042752-200603000-00006 ↗
19. Outcomes associated with early post-traumatic osteoarthritis and other negative health consequences 3–10 years following knee joint injury in youth sport10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.021 ↗
20. The relationship between self-reported and on field lower extremity functional assessment tools used for assessing functional status in hip dysfunction athletes
21. Functional movement screen and Y balance tests in adolescent footballers with hip/groin symptoms10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.07.002 ↗
22. Accuracy of movement quality screening to document effects of neuromuscular control retraining exercises in a young ex-footballer with hip and groin symptoms: A proof of concept case study10.1016/j.mehy.2018.08.027 ↗
23. Characterising movement patterns in elite male professional golfers using an observational hip and lower limb movement screen10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.606 ↗
24. Movement patterns during a small knee bend test in academy footballers with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)
25. Factor structure of the functional movement screen in marine officer candidates10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182a6dd83 ↗
26. Maturational effect on functional movement Screen™ score in adolescent soccer players10.1016/j.jsams.2015.12.001 ↗
27. Correlation coefficients10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 ↗
28. Functional Movement Screen™—Normative values in healthy distance runners10.1055/s-0034-1382055 ↗
29. ASB clinical biomechanics award winner 2006: Prospective study of the biomechanical factors associated with iliotibial band syndrome10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.07.001 ↗
30. The influence of altered lower-extremity kinematics on patellofemoral joint dysfunction: A theoretical perspective10.2519/jospt.2003.33.11.639 ↗
31. The effect of cam FAI on hip and pelvic motion during maximum squat10.1007/s11999-008-0620-x ↗
32. Trunk and lower limb biomechanics during stair climbing in people with and without symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.01.015 ↗
33. Trunk, pelvis and hip biomechanics in individuals with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: Strategies for step ascent10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.01.005 ↗
34. Lower limb biomechanics in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1136/bjsports-2017-097839 ↗
35. Kinematic differences during single-leg step-down between individuals with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and individuals without hip pain10.2519/jospt.2018.7794 ↗
36. Runners with patellofemoral pain have altered biomechanics which targeted interventions can modify: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.11.018 ↗
37. A systematic review of the discriminating biomechanical parameters during the single leg squat10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.01.007 ↗
38. Diagnosis and treatment of movement system impairment syndromes10.1016/j.bjpt.2017.08.001 ↗
39. Relationship between the movements of the lumbar spine and hip10.1016/S0167-9457(02)00117-3 ↗
40. Functional movement screen (fms™) score does not predict injury in English Premier League youth academy football players10.1080/24733938.2017.1283436 ↗
41. Validity of functional screening tests to predict lost-time lower quarter injury in a cohort of female collegiate athletes10.26603/ijspt20170948 ↗
42. The role of the Trendelenburg Test in the examination of gait10.1179/174328809X452836 ↗
43. Hip biomechanics during a single-leg squat: 5 key differences between people with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and those without hip pain10.2519/jospt.2019.8356 ↗
44. Dynamic balance performance and noncontact lower extremity injury in college football players10.1177/1941738113498703 ↗
45. Relationship between the kinematics of the trunk and lower extremity and performance on the Y-balance test10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.05.004 ↗
46. Functional performance deficits in adolescent athletes with a history of lateral ankle sprain(s)10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.07.010 ↗
47. Associations between functional and isolated performance measures in college women’s soccer players10.1123/jsr.2016-0016 ↗
48. Sensor-based mobile functional movement screening10.1007/978-3-642-37893-5_25 ↗
49. Grading the functional movement screen10.1519/JSC.0000000000000654 ↗
50. Wu, W.-L., Lee, M.-H., Hsu, H.-T., Ho, W.-H., and Liang, J.-M. (2020). Development of an automatic functional movement screening system with inertial measurement unit sensors. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11010096 ↗