Egyptian Shabtis Identification by Means of Deep Neural Networks and Semantic Integration with Europeana
Source abstract
Abstract
Ancient Egyptians had a complex religion, which was active for longer than the time that has passed since Cleopatra until our days. One amazing belief was to be buried with funerary statuettes to help the deceased carry out his/her tasks in the underworld. These funerary statuettes, mainly known as shabtis, were produced in different materials and were usually inscribed in hieroglyphs with formulas including the name of the deceased. Shabtis are important archaeological objects which can help to identify the owners, their jobs, ranks or their families. They are also used for tomb dating because, depending on different elements: color, formula, tools, wig, hand positions, etc., it is possible to associate them to a concrete type or period of time. Shabtis are spread all over the world, in excavations, museums or private collections, and many of them have not been studied and identified because this process requires a deep study and reading of the hieroglyphs. Our system is able to solve this problem using two different YOLO v3 networks for detecting the figure itself and the hieroglyphic names, which provide identification and cataloguing. Until now, there has been no other work on the detection and identification of shabtis. In addition, a semantic approach has been followed, creating an ontology to connect our system with the semantic metadata aggregator, Europeana, linking our results with known shabtis in different museums. A complete dataset has been created, a comparison with previous technologies for similar problems has been provided, such as SIFT in the ancient coin classification, and the results of identification and cataloguing are shown. These results are over similar problems and have led us to create a web application that shows our system and is available on line.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Currency Recognition and Detection · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Digital Media Forensic Detection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
ITAP-DISA, Department of Systems Engineering and Automation, School of Industrial Engineering, University of Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain
Funding
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades · Junta de Castilla y León
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Note on a tomb found at Tell er Roba
2. Schneider, H.D. (1977). Shabtis: An Introduction to the History of Ancient Egyptian Funerary Statuettes with a Catalogue of the Collection of Shabtis in the National Museum of Antiquities at Leiden: Collections of the National Museum of Antiquities at Leiden, Rijksmuseum van Oudheden.
3. Stewart, H.M. (1995). Egyptian Shabtis, Osprey Publishing.
4. Petrie, S.W.M.F. (1974). Shabtis: Illustrated by the Egyptian Collection in University College, London, Aris & Phillips.
5. Janes, G., and Bangbala, T. (2002). Shabtis, A Private View: Ancient Egyptian Funerary Statuettes in European Private Collections, Cybèle.
6. Aubert, J.F., and Aubert, L. (1974). Statuettes égyptiennes: Chaouabtis, Ouchebtis, Librairie d’Amérique et d’Orient.
7. de Araújo, L.M. (2003). Estatuetas Funerárias Egípcias da XXI Dinastia, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
8. Newberry, P.E. (1930). Funerary Statuettes and Model Sarcophagi, Institut français d’archéologie orientale, Service des Antiquités de l’Égypte. Catalogue général des Antiquités Égyptiennes du Musée du Caire.
9. Bovot, J.L. (2003). Les Serviteurs Funéraires Royaux et Princiers de L’ancienne Egypte, Réunion des Musées Nationaux.
10. Brodbeck, A., and Schlogl, H. (1990). Agyptische Totenfiguren aus Offentlichen und Privaten Sammlungen der Schweiz, Universitätsverlag Freiburg Schweiz, Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht Göttingen. OBO SA.
11. Janes, G. (2010). The Shabti Collections: West Park Museum, Macclesfield, Olicar House Publications.
12. Janes, G., and Gallery, W.M.A. (2011). The Shabti Collections. 2. Warrington Museum & Art Gallery, Olicar House Publications.
13. Janes, G., and Moore, A. (2011). The Shabti Collections: Rochdale Arts & Heritage Service, Olicar House Publications.
14. Janes, G., and Cavanagh, K. (2012). The Shabti Collections: Stockport Museums, Olicar House Publications.
15. Manchester University Museum, and Janes, G. (2012). The Shabti Collections: A Selection from Manchester Museum, Olicar House Publications.
16. World Museum Liverpool, and Janes, G. (2016). The Shabti Collections: A Selection from World Museum, Liverpool, Olicar House Publications.
17. Zambanini, S., and Kampel, M. (2012, January 5–9). Coarse-to-fine correspondence search for classifying ancient coins. Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Daejeon, Korea.10.1007/978-3-642-37484-5_3 ↗
18. Aslan, S., Vascon, S., and Pelillo, M. (2018, January 22–24). Ancient coin classification using graph transduction games. Proceedings of the 2018 Metrology for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (MetroArchaeo), Cassino FR, Italy.10.1109/MetroArchaeo43810.2018.13605 ↗
19. Two sides of the same coin: Improved ancient coin classification using Graph Transduction Games10.1016/j.patrec.2019.12.007 ↗
20. Ancient coin classification using reverse motif recognition: Image-based classification of roman republican coins10.1109/MSP.2015.2409331 ↗
21. Mirza-Mohammadi, M., Escalera, S., and Radeva, P. (2009, January 2–4). Contextual-guided bag-of-visual-words model for multi-class object categorization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, Münster, Germany.10.1007/978-3-642-03767-2_91 ↗
22. Anwar, H., Anwar, S., Zambanini, S., and Porikli, F. (2019). CoinNet: Deep Ancient Roman Republican Coin Classification via Feature Fusion and Attention. arXiv.
23. Llamas, J., M Lerones, P., Medina, R., Zalama, E., and Gómez-García-Bermejo, J. (2017). Classification of architectural heritage images using deep learning techniques. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7100992 ↗
24. Automatic classification of archaeological pottery sherds
25. Computational machine learning representation for the flexoelectricity effect in truncated pyramid structures
26. A novel deep learning based method for the computational material design of flexoelectric nanostructures with topology optimization10.1016/j.finel.2019.07.001 ↗
27. Lowe, D.G. (1999, January 20–27). Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Kerkyra, Greece.10.1109/ICCV.1999.790410 ↗
28. Speeded-up robust features (SURF)10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014 ↗
29. Rublee, E., Rabaud, V., Konolige, K., and Bradski, G. (2011, January 6–13). ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision, Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126544 ↗
30. Redmon, J., and Farhadi, A. (2018). YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement. arXiv.
31. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., and Farhadi, A. (2016, January 27–30). You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.91 ↗
32. Redmon, J., and Farhadi, A. (2016). YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Stronger. arXiv.10.1109/CVPR.2017.690 ↗
33. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y ↗
34. Europeana linked open data (data.europeana.eu)10.3233/SW-120092 ↗
35. Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081 ↗
36. A Translational Approach to Portable Ontologies10.1006/knac.1993.1008 ↗
37. World Wide Web Consortium (2012). OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
38. Baader, F. (2003). The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications, Cambridge University Press.
39. Lassila, O., and Swick, R.R. (1999). Resource Description Framework (RDF) Model and Syntax Specification, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
40. Gardiner, A.H. (1969). Egyptian Grammar. Being an Intr. to the Study of Hieroglyphs, Oxford University Press.
41. Human detection using a mobile platform and novel features derived from a visual saliency mechanism10.1016/j.imavis.2009.06.006 ↗
42. VOCUS FTS (2005). A Visual Attention System for Object Detection and Goal Directed Search. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Bonn].
43. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis10.1109/34.730558 ↗
44. Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., and Rabinovich, A. (2015, January 7–12). Going deeper with convolutions. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594 ↗
45. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z. (2016, January 27–30). Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308 ↗
46. Knublauch, H., Horridge, M., Musen, M.A., Rector, A.L., Stevens, R., Drummond, N., Lord, P.W., Noy, N.F., Seidenberg, J., and Wang, H. (2005). The Protege OWL Experience, OWLED.
47. Apache Jena Server (2020, September 11). Apache. Available online: https://jena.apache.org/.
48. SPARQL 1.1 federated query
49. Noble, F.K. (2016, January 28–30). Comparison of OpenCV’s feature detectors and feature matchers. Proceedings of the 2016 23rd International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP), Nanjing, China.10.1109/M2VIP.2016.7827292 ↗
50. Docker: Lightweight linux containers for consistent development and deployment