On Image Classification in Video Analysis of Omnidirectional Apis Mellifera Traffic: Random Reinforced Forests vs. Shallow Convolutional Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Omnidirectional honeybee traffic is the number of bees moving in arbitrary directions in close proximity to the landing pad of a beehive over a period of time. Automated video analysis of such traffic is critical for continuous colony health assessment. In our previous research, we proposed a two-tier algorithm to measure omnidirectional bee traffic in videos. Our algorithm combines motion detection with image classification: in tier 1, motion detection functions as class-agnostic object location to generate regions with possible objects; in tier 2, each region from tier 1 is classified by a class-specific classifier. In this article, we present an empirical and theoretical comparison of random reinforced forests and shallow convolutional networks as tier 2 classifiers. A random reinforced forest is a random forest trained on a dataset with reinforcement learning. We present several methods of training random reinforced forests and compare their performance with shallow convolutional networks on seven image datasets. We develop a theoretical framework to assess the complexity of image classification by a image classifier. We formulate and prove three theorems on finding optimal random reinforced forests. Our conclusion is that, despite their limitations, random reinforced forests are a reasonable alternative to convolutional networks when memory footprints and classification and energy efficiencies are important factors. We outline several ways in which the performance of random reinforced forests may be improved.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Insect and Pesticide Research · Plant and animal studies · Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Computer Science, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84321, USA
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. (2021, August 09). Langstroth Beehive. Available online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langstroth_hive.
2. Kulyukin, V., and Mukherjee, S. (2019). On video analysis of omnidirectional bee traffic: Counting bee motions with motion detection and image classification. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9183743 ↗
3. Zivkovic, Z. (2004, January 26). Improved adaptive gaussian mixture model for background subtraction. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Cambridge, UK.10.1109/ICPR.2004.1333992 ↗
4. KaewTraKulPong, P., and Bowden, R. (2002). An Improved adaptive background mixture model for real-time tracking with shadow detection. Video Based Surveillance Systems, Springer. [1st ed.].10.1007/978-1-4615-0913-4_11 ↗
5. Efficient adaptive density estimation per image pixel for the task of background subtraction10.1016/j.patrec.2005.11.005 ↗
6. Cristianini, N., and Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000). An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511801389 ↗
7. Random forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
8. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks10.1145/3065386 ↗
9. Sutton, R., and Barto, A. (1998). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, MIT Press. [1st ed.].10.1109/TNN.1998.712192 ↗
10. McDonnell, M.D., and Vladusich, T. (2015, January 12–16). Enhanced image classification with a fast-learining shallow convolutional neural network. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Killarney, Ireland.10.1109/IJCNN.2015.7280796 ↗
11. Estivill-Castro, V., Lattin, D., Suraweera, F., and Vithanage, V. (2003, January 14–17). Tracking bees—A 3d, outdoor small object environment. Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing, Barcelona, Spain.
12. Weinberg, S. (1972). Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, Wiley.
13. A new approach for the simultaneous tracking of multiple honeybees for analysis of hive behavior10.1007/s13592-011-0060-6 ↗
14. An imaging system for monitoring the in-and-out activity of honey bees10.1016/j.compag.2012.08.006 ↗
15. Use of the hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures10.1145/361237.361242 ↗
16. Ghadiri, A. (2013). Implementation of an Automated Image Processing System for Observing the Activities of Honey Bees. [Master’s Thesis, Appalachian State University].
17. Pollen bearing honey bee detection in hive entrance video recorded by remote embedded system for pollination monitoring10.5194/isprs-annals-III-7-51-2016 ↗
18. Rodriguez, I.F., Megret, R., Egnor, R., Branson, K., Agosto, J.L., Giray, T., and Acuna, E. (2018, January 20). Multiple insect and animal tracking in video using part affinity fields. Proceedings of the Workshop Visual Observation and Analysis of Vertebrate and Insect Behavior (VAIB) at International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), Beijin, China.
19. Kulyukin, V. (2021). Audio, image, video, and weather datasets for continuous electronic beehive monitoring. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11104632 ↗
20. Thompson, N.C., Greenewald, K., Lee, K., and Manso, G.F. (2020). The computational limits of deep learning. arXiv.
21. (2021, April 14). Scikit-Learn Library. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/.
22. Nielsen, M.A. (2015). Neural Networks and Deep Learning, Determination Press.