Machine Learning in Discriminating Active Volcanoes of the Hellenic Volcanic Arc
Source abstract
Abstract
Identifying the provenance of volcanic rocks can be essential for improving geological maps in the field of geology and providing a tool for the geochemical fingerprinting of ancient artifacts like millstones and anchors in the field of geoarchaeology. This study examines a new approach to this problem by using machine learning algorithms (MLAs). In order to discriminate the four active volcanic regions of the Hellenic Volcanic Arc (HVA) in Southern Greece, MLAs were trained with geochemical data of major elements, acquired from the GEOROC database, of the volcanic rocks of the Hellenic Volcanic Arc (HVA). Ten MLAs were trained with six variations of the same dataset of volcanic rock samples originating from the HVA. The experiments revealed that the Extreme Gradient Boost model achieved the best performance, reaching 93.07% accuracy. The model developed in the framework of this research was used to implement a cloud-based application which is publicly accessible at This application can be used to predict the provenance of a volcanic rock sample, within the area of the HVA, based on its geochemical composition, easily obtained by using the X-ray fluorescence (XRF) technique.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping · Geological and Geochemical Analysis · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
HUMAIN-Lab, Department of Computer Science, International Hellenic University, 65404 Kavala, Greece
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. A West-East Traverse along the Magmatism of the South Aegean Volcanic Arc in the Light of Volcanological, Chemical and Isotope Data
2. Tertiary to Quaternary Evolution of Volcanism in the Aegean Region10.1144/GSL.SP.1984.017.01.55 ↗
3. The South Aegean Active Volcanic Arc: Relationships between Magmatism and Tectonics
4. Geochemistry of eocene calc-alkaline volcanic rocks from the Kastamonu area, Northern Turkey10.1007/BF00384745 ↗
5. Tectonic Setting of Basic Volcanic Rocks Determined Using Trace Element Analyses10.1016/0012-821X(73)90129-5 ↗
6. Plate Tectonics and Geochemical Composition of Sandstone10.1086/628815 ↗
7. A Reevaluation of Tectonic Discrimination Diagrams and a New Probabilistic Approach Using Large Geochemical Databases: Moving beyond Binary and Ternary Plots
8. Vermeesch, P. (2006). Tectonic Discrimination Diagrams Revisited. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems, 7.10.1029/2005GC001092 ↗
9. New Discrimination Diagrams for Basalts Based on Big Data Research10.1080/20964471.2019.1576262 ↗
10. Max Planck Institute for Chemistry (2021, June 29). Geochemical Rock Database. Available online: http://georoc.mpch-mainz.gwdg.de/georoc/.
11. Lehnert, K., and Robinson, S. (2021, June 29). EarthChem. Available online: https://www.earthchem.org/petdb.
12. Trace Element Indiscrimination Diagrams10.1016/j.lithos.2015.06.022 ↗
13. Intelligent Determination and Data Mining for Tectonic Settings of Basalts Based on Big Data Methods
14. Emerging Trends in Machine Learning for Signal Processing10.1155/2017/6521367 ↗
15. Tectonic Discrimination of Basalts with Classification Trees10.1016/j.gca.2005.12.016 ↗
16. Solving Petrological Problems through Machine Learning: The Study Case of Tectonic Discrimination Using Geochemical and Isotopic Data10.1007/s00410-016-1292-2 ↗
17. Geochemical Discrimination and Characteristics of Magmatic Tectonic Settings: A Machine-Learning-Based Approach10.1029/2017GC007401 ↗
18. Tectonic Discrimination of Olivine in Basalt Using Data Mining Techniques Based on Major Elements: A Comparative Study from Multiple Perspectives10.1080/20964471.2019.1572452 ↗
19. Ren, Q., Li, M., Han, S., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Q., and Shi, J. (2019). Basalt Tectonic Discrimination Using Combined Machine Learning Approach. Minerals, 9.10.3390/min9060376 ↗
20. Itano, K., Ueki, K., Iizuka, T., and Kuwatani, T. (2020). Geochemical Discrimination of Monazite Source Rock Based on Machine Learning Techniques and Multinomial Logistic Regression Analysis. Geosciences, 10.10.3390/geosciences10020063 ↗
21. Combining Machine Learning Techniques, Microanalyses and Large Geochemical Datasets for Tephrochronological Studies in Complex Volcanic Areas: New Age Constraints for the Pleistocene Magmatism of Central Italy10.1016/j.quageo.2016.12.003 ↗
22. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects10.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗
23. Mitchell, T.M. (1997). Machine Learning, McGraw-Hill Education. [1st ed.].
24. An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting10.1080/00220670209598786 ↗
25. Using Discriminant Analysis for Multi-Class Classification: An Experimental Investigation10.1007/s10115-006-0013-y ↗
26. Nearest Neighbor Pattern Classification10.1109/TIT.1967.1053964 ↗
27. John, G.H., and Langley, P. (2013). Estimating Continuous Distributions in Bayesian Classifiers. arXiv.
28. Support-Vector Networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
29. Collobert, R., and Bengio, S. (2004, January 20). Links between Perceptrons, MLPs and SVMs. Proceedings of the Twenty-First international conference on Machine learning-ICML ’04, Banff, AB, Canada.10.1145/1015330.1015415 ↗
30. Minsky, M., and Papert, S. (1969). Perceptrons, M.I.T. Press.
31. Extreme Learning Machine and Its Applications10.1007/s00521-013-1522-8 ↗
32. Extreme Learning Machine: Theory and Applications10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.126 ↗
33. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., and Stone, C.J. (2017). Classification And Regression Trees, Routledge. [1st ed.].10.1201/9781315139470 ↗
34. Bagging Predictors10.1007/BF00058655 ↗
35. Random Forests10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
36. Random Decision Forests10.1109/ICDAR.1995.598994 ↗
37. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
38. Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine10.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
39. Yan, X., and Su, X.G. (2009). Linear Regression Analysis: Theory and Computing, World Scientific Publishing Company.10.1142/6986 ↗
40. Mckinney, W. (2010, January 9–15). Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, Austin, TX, USA.10.25080/Majora-92bf1922-00a ↗
41. The NumPy Array: A Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation10.1109/MCSE.2011.37 ↗
42. Thorpe, R.S. (1982). The Mineralogy and Petrology of Tertiary-Recent Orogenic Volcanic Rocks: With a Special Reference to the Andesitic-Basaltic Compositional Range. Andesites: Orogenic Andesites and Related Rocks, Wiley.
43. A Chemical Classification of Volcanic Rocks Based on the Total Alkali-Silica Diagram10.1093/petrology/27.3.745 ↗
44. Van Rossum, G., and Drake, F.L. (1995). Python Reference Manual, Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica.
45. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., and Louppe, G. (2018). Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python. arXiv.
46. Glossary of Terms10.1023/A:1017181826899 ↗
47. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique
48. Ouzounis, A. (2021, September 06). Geology in Greece. Available online: http://geology.gr/.