Establishment of a New Biomechanical Measurement Method for Surface Deformation of Bone by Force Application via Dental Implants—A Pilot Study
Source abstract
Abstract
Purpose: To date, the qualitative and quantitative recording of biomechanical processes in dental implants represents one of the greatest challenges in modern dentistry. Modern, dynamic, 3D optical measurement techniques allow highly constant and highly accurate measurement of biomechanical processes and can be superior to conventional methods. This work serves to establish a new measurement method. Materials and Methods: A comparative analysis was undertaken for two different measurement systems, two conventional strain gauges versus the 3D optical two-camera measurement system ARAMIS (GOM GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany), as they detected surface changes on an artificial bone block under masticatory force application. Two implants (Straumann Standard Implants Regular Neck, Straumann GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) were placed in the bone block, and three different three-unit bridges were fabricated. Increasing masticatory forces, from 0 to 200 N, were applied to the bone block via each of these bridges and the inserted implants. Fifteen repetitions of the test were performed using a universal testing machine. The computer unit of the ARAMIS system was used to simultaneously integrate the surface changes recorded by the strain gauges and the ARAMIS system. The areas on the bone block examined by the dynamic 3D optical measurement method corresponded exactly to the locations and extent of the strain gauges. A statistical comparative analysis was carried out separately for the strain gauges and the corresponding optical measuring surface at the defined force magnitudes. The equivalence test and the intraclass correlation served as statistical means. Results: In the case of the intraclass correlation, a clear concordance of both measurement methods could be shown for all examined cases. For the equivalence test, no significance could be shown in individual cases. Conclusion: The accuracy of the modern, dynamic, 3D optical measurement method is comparable to that of conventional strain gauges. On this basis, versatile new research approaches in the field of biomechanics of dental implants can be pursued by establishing this method.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Prosthodontics, Erlangen University Hospital, Glueckstrasse 11, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
Institute of Manufacturing Technology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstrasse 13, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstrasse 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. The influence of the location of load transfer on strains around implants supporting four unit cement-retained fixed prostheses: In vitro evaluation of axial versus off-set loading10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00867.x ↗
2. Wolff’s Law and bone’s structural adaptations to mechanical usage: An overview for clinicians
3. Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: A working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone10.1034/j.1600-0501.1999.100601.x ↗
4. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s Law for clinicians
5. Microstrain around dental implants supporting fixed partial prostheses under axial and non-axial loading conditions, in vitro strain gauge analysis10.1097/SCS.0b013e31829ac83d ↗
6. Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implant-abutment joints: A strain gauge comparative analysis10.1590/S1678-77572010000300005 ↗
7. Peri-implant biomechanical responses to standard. short-wide. and mini implants supporting single crowns under axial and off-axial loading (an in vitro study)10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00102 ↗
8. Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: A literature review10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.018 ↗
9. The role of prosthetic abutment material on the stress distribution in a maxillary single implant-supported fixed prosthesis10.1016/j.msec.2016.04.004 ↗
10. Stress evaluation of implant-abutment connections under different loading conditions: A 3D finite element study10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00205 ↗
11. Infinite to finite: An overview of finite element analysis10.4103/0970-9290.70813 ↗
12. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature10.1067/mpr.2001.115251 ↗
13. Application of Finite Element Model in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_296_18 ↗
14. Use of stress analysis methods to evaluate the biomechanics of oral rehabilitation with implants10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00066 ↗
15. A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: Reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model10.1186/s40729-015-0011-5 ↗
16. Nonlinear finite element analyses: Advances and challenges in dental applications10.1016/j.jdent.2008.03.010 ↗
17. The effects of post and core material combination on the surface strain of the 4-unit zirconia fixed partial denture margins10.4012/dmj.2016-343 ↗
18. Influence of fixation mode and superstructure span upon strain development of implant fixed partial dentures10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00236.x ↗
19. Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants in the edentulous posterior mandible10.1186/s40729-016-0050-6 ↗
20. Extracting accurate strain measurements in bone mechanics: A critical review of current methods10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.006 ↗
21. A photoelastic and strain gauge analysis of angled abutments for an implant system
22. Three-dimensional force measurements on oral implants: A methodological study10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00581.x ↗
23. Comparative strain gauge analysis of external and internal hexagon. Morse taper. and influence of straight and offset implant configuration10.1097/ID.0b013e318211fce8 ↗
24. A strain gauge analysis comparing 4-unit veneered zirconium dioxide implant-borne fixed dental prosthesis on engaging and non-engaging abutments before and after torque application10.1002/cre2.97 ↗
25. Strain development in 3-unit implant-supported CAD/CAM restorations
26. Strain development of screw-retained implant-supported fixed restorations: Procera implant bridge versus conventionally cast restorations
27. A strain gauge analysis comparing external and internal implant-abutment connections10.1097/ID.0000000000000063 ↗
28. Implant-to-bone force transmission: A pilot study for in vivo strain gauge measurement technique10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.10.014 ↗
29. The implanted electrical resistance strain gauge: In vitro studies on data integrity10.3109/03091909109009972 ↗
30. Thermal Expansion and Magnetostriction Measurements at Cryogenic Temperature Using the Strain Gauge Method10.3389/fchem.2018.00072 ↗
31. Nonlinearity and hysteresis of resonant strain gauges10.1109/84.661394 ↗
32. Using digital image correlation to determine bone surface strains during loading and after adaptation of the mouse tibia10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.10.042 ↗
33. Peterka, J., and Buranský, I. (2011). Using Aramis for Measurement of Deformation of Thin-Walled Parts during Milling, Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology. Research Papers.10.2478/v10186-010-0005-3 ↗
34. Compressive strains and displacement in a partially dentate lower jaw rehabilitated with two different treatment modalities
35. Three-dimensional surface geometries of the rabbit soleus muscle during contraction: Input for biomechanical modelling and its validation10.1007/s10237-013-0476-1 ↗
36. Influence of attachment and bone loss on the mobility of incisors and canine teeth10.3109/00016357.2012.711488 ↗
37. Correlations between photogrammetric measurements of tooth mobility and the Periotest method10.3109/00016357.2011.575080 ↗
38. Local deformation fields and marginal integrity of sculptable bulk-fill. low-shrinkage and conventional composites10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.011 ↗
39. Effect of metal conditioner on bonding of porcelain to cobalt-chromium alloy10.4047/jap.2016.8.1.1 ↗
40. PEEK polymer’s properties and its use in prosthodontics. A review
41. Dental Ceramics for Restoration and Metal Veneering10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.005 ↗
42. Experimental mechanical strain measurement of tissues10.7717/peerj.6545 ↗
43. Whole Field Strain Measurement on Complex Surfaces by Digital Speckle Pattern Interferometry
44. Straight and offset implant placement under axial and nonaxial loads in implant-supported prostheses: Strain gauge analysis10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00871.x ↗
45. A strain gauge and photoelastic analysis of in vivo strain and in vitro stress distribution in human dental supporting structures10.1016/S0003-9969(00)00031-5 ↗
46. Applications of digital image correlation to biological tissues10.1117/1.1753270 ↗
47. Elastic modulus in the selection of interbody implants10.21037/jss.2017.05.01 ↗
48. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses10.1016/0022-3913(83)90361-X ↗
49. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 ↗