journal article·2021-08-10Open access

Case Study of Expected Loss Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Model Based on Maintenance Data

Seungsik Min, Hyeonae Jang

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 16

Abstract

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is one of the most widely employed pre-evaluation techniques to avoid risks during the product design and manufacturing phases. Risk priority number (RPN), a risk assessment indicator used in FMEA, is widely used in the field due to its simple calculation process, but its limitations as an absolute risk assessment indicator have been pointed out. There has also been criticism of the unstructured nature and lack of systematicity in the FMEA procedures. This work proposes an expected loss-FMEA (EL-FMEA) model that organizes FMEA procedures and structures quantitative risk assessment metrics. In the EL-FMEA model, collectible maintenance record data is defined and based on this, the failure rate of components and systems and downtime and uptime of the system are calculated. Moreover, based on these calculated values, the expected economic loss is computed considering the failure detection time. It also provides an alternative coefficient to evaluate whether or not a detection system is installed to improve the expected loss of failure. Finally, a case study was conducted based on the maintenance record data, and the application procedure of the EL-FMEA model was presented in detail, and the practicality of this model was verified through the results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Reliability and Maintenance Optimization · Risk and Safety Analysis · Technology Assessment and Management

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Natural Science, Korea Naval Academy, Changwon 51704, Korea

Department of Technology Management Engineering, Jeonju University, Jeonju 55069, Korea

Funding

Jeonju University · National Research Foundation of Korea

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. FMEA-CM based quantitative risk assessment for process industries—A case study of coal-to-methanol plant in China10.1016/j.psep.2020.10.052 ↗
2. Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010 ↗
3. A systematic approach for diagnosing service failure: Service-specific FMEA and grey relational analysis approach10.1016/j.mcm.2011.07.042 ↗
4. Application of FMEA to an automotive leaf spring manufacturing organization10.1108/17542731211226772 ↗
5. An extension to Fuzzy Developed Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.009 ↗
6. A risk evaluation and prioritization method for FMEA with prospect theory and Choquet integral10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.009 ↗
7. Deulgaonkar, V.R., Ingolikar, N., Borkar, A., Ghute, S., and Awate, N. (2021). Failure analysis of diesel engine piston in transport utility vehicles. Eng. Fail. Anal., 120.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.105008 ↗
8. Risk assessment by failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) using an interval number based logistic regression model10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104967 ↗
10. Jang, H., and Min, S. (2019). Time-Dependent Probabilistic Approach of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9224939 ↗
11. Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.018 ↗
12. A hybrid risk analysis method for a yacht fuel system safety10.1016/j.ssci.2015.05.010 ↗
13. Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.013 ↗
14. Fuzzy based risk prioritisation in an auto LPG dispensing station10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.011 ↗
15. Failure mode and effects analysis using extended matter-element model and AHP10.1016/j.cie.2019.106233 ↗
16. Using cost based FMEA to enhance reliability and serviceability10.1016/j.aei.2004.07.002 ↗
17. Failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy utility cost estimation10.1108/02656710710826216 ↗
18. Cost-oriented failure mode and effects analysis10.1108/02656710810873871 ↗
19. Probabilistic priority numbers for failure modes and effects analysis10.1108/02656711211216171 ↗
20. A Dempster-Shafer Theory-based approach to the Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) under epistemic uncertainty: Application to the propulsion system of a fishing vessel10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.018 ↗
21. New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method10.1016/j.ress.2017.06.014 ↗
22. Failure modes, mechanisms and effect analysis on temperature redundant sensor stage10.1016/j.ress.2018.08.013 ↗
23. General model for the risk priority number in failure mode and effects analysis10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.010 ↗
24. Improving risk evaluation in FMEA with a hybrid multiple criteria decision making method10.1108/IJQRM-10-2013-0169 ↗
25. An extended VIKOR method based on entropy measure for the failure modes risk assessment—A case study of the geothermal power plant (GPP)10.1016/j.ssci.2016.10.006 ↗
26. A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.018 ↗
27. HSE risk prioritization using robust DEA-FMEA approach with undesirable outputs: A study of automotive parts industry in Iran10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.015 ↗
28. Improving failure analysis efficiency by combining FTA and FMEA in a recursive manner10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.024 ↗
29. A manufacturing failure mode and effect analysis based on fuzzy and probabilistic risk analysis10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106689 ↗
30. System failure behavior and maintenance decision making using, RCA, FMEA and FM10.1108/13552511011030336 ↗
31. Fuzzy methodology applied to Probabilistic Safety Assessment for digital system in nuclear power plants10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.06.044 ↗
32. Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00179-5 ↗
33. Productivity Improvement of Transmission Electron Microscopes—A Case Study10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.217 ↗
34. An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: The priority-cost FMECA10.1016/j.ress.2008.09.009 ↗
35. ANP/RPN: A multi criteria evaluation of the Risk Priority Number10.1002/qre.1217 ↗
36. Risk Evaluation Based on the Hierarchical Time Delay Model in FMEA10.7469/JKSQM.2016.44.2.373 ↗
37. An expected loss model for FMEA under periodic monitoring of failure causes
38. A Case Study of Performing Process FMEA by using PFEM
39. Kondrateva, O.E., Romashov, M.K., and Loktionov, O.A. (2021, January 11–13). Analysis of the Applicability of Key Risk Assessment Methods for Solving Problems of Reducing Accidents at Energy Facilities. Proceedings of the 2021 3rd International Youth Conference on Radio Electronics, Electrical and Power Engineering (REEPE), Moscow, Russia.10.1109/REEPE51337.2021.9388031 ↗
40. Analyzing Safety of Collaborative Cyber-Physical Systems Considering Variability10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3021460 ↗
41. Cost-based fire risk assessment in natural gas industry by means of fuzzy FTA and ETA10.1016/j.jlp.2019.104025 ↗