journal article·2021-07-11Open access

Computation of Optimized Electrode Arrays for 3-D Electrical Resistivity Tomography Surveys

Kleanthis Simyrdanis, Nikos Papadopoulos, Dimitrios Oikonomou

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 14

Abstract

The present study explores the applicability and effectiveness of an optimization technique applied to electrical resistivity tomography data. The procedure is based on the Jacobian matrix, where the most sensitive measurements are selected from a comprehensive data set to enhance the least resolvable parameters of the reconstructed model. Two existing inversion programs in two and three dimensions are modified to incorporate this new approach. Both of them are selecting the optimum data from an initial comprehensive data set which is comprised of merged conventional arrays. With the two-dimensional (2-D) optimization approach, the most sensitive measurements are selected from a 2-D survey profile and then a clone of the resulting optimum profile reproduces a three-dimensional (3-D) optimum data set composed of equally spaced parallel lines. In a different approach, with the 3-D optimization technique, the optimum data are selected from a 3-D data set of equally spaced individual parallel lines. Both approaches are compared with Stummer’s optimization technique which is based on the resolution matrix. The Jacobian optimization approach has the advantage of selecting the optimum data set without the need for the solution of the inversion problem since the Jacobian matrix is calculated as part of the forward resistivity problem, thus being faster from previous published approached based on the calculation of the sensitivity matrix. Synthetic 3-D data based on the extension of previous published works for the 2-D optimization case and field data from two case studies in Greece are tested, thus verifying the validity of the present study, where fewer measurements from the initial data set (about 15–50%) are able to reconstruct a model similar with the one produced from the original comprehensive data set.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods · Geophysical Methods and Applications · Seismic Waves and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Laboratory of Geophysical-Satellite Remote Sensing and Archaeoenvironment (GeoSat ReSeArch Lab), Institute for Mediterranean Studies (IMS), Foundation for Research and Technology (FORTH), Nikiforou Foka 130, 74100 Rethymno, Greece

Funding

Operational Program. "Crete" 2014-2020 and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. Loke, M.H., Wilkinson, P.B., and Chambers, J.E. (2013, January 9–11). Computation of Optimized Arrays for 3-D electrical imaging surveys, Near Surface Geoscience. Proceedings of the 19th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Bochum, Germany.10.3997/2214-4609.20131407 ↗
2. Application of ERT and GPR for demarcating the saline water intrusion in coastal aquifers of Southern India
3. Geophysical and hydrological data assimilation to monitor water content dynamics in the rocky unsaturated zone10.1007/s10661-018-6671-x ↗
4. Application of Geotechnical and Geophysical Field Measurements in an Active Alpine Environment10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.11.018 ↗
5. Characterization and monitoring of subsurface contamination from Olive Oil Mills’ waste waters using Electrical Resistivity Tomography10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.348 ↗
6. 3D electrical imaging of known targets at a con-trolled environmental test site10.1007/s00254-001-0452-4 ↗
7. Resolution of 3-D Electrical Resistivity Images from Inversions of 2-D Orthogonal Lines10.2113/JEEG10.4.339 ↗
8. Efficient ERT measuring and inversion strategies for 3D imaging of buried antiquities10.3997/1873-0604.2007017 ↗
9. L- and CORNER-arrays for 3D electric resistivity tomography: An alternative for geophysical surveys in urban zones10.3997/1873-0604.2015015 ↗
10. Offset-Electrode Profile Acquisition Strategy for Electrical Resistivity Tomography10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.01.027 ↗
11. Archaeological investigation by electrical resistivity tomography: A preliminary study10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb01159.x ↗
12. On the completeness of data sets with multi-electrode systems for electrical resistivity survey10.1111/j.1365-2478.1993.tb00885.x ↗
13. A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00423.x ↗
14. An Algorithm for the Fast 3-D Resistivity Inversion of Surface Electrical Resistivity Data: Application on Imaging Buried Antiquities10.1111/j.1365-2478.2010.00936.x ↗
15. Experimental design: Electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information10.1190/1.1649381 ↗
16. Improved strategies for the automatic selection of optimized sets of ERT measurement configurations10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.03196.x ↗
17. Adaptive time-lapse optimized survey design for electrical resistivity tomography monitoring10.1093/gji/ggv329 ↗
18. Fast computation of optimized electrode arrays for 2D resistivity surveys10.1016/j.cageo.2010.03.016 ↗
19. Parallel computation of optimized arrays for 2-D electrical imaging surveys10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04796.x ↗
20. Optimized arrays for 2D resistivity surveys with combined surface and buried arrays10.3997/1873-0604.2015038 ↗
21. A method of fast, sequential experimental design for linearized geophysical inverse problems10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04156.x ↗
22. Constructive optimization of electrode locations for target-focused resistivity monitoring10.1190/geo2014-0214.1 ↗
23. Comparison of measuring strategies for the 3-D electrical resistivity imaging of tumuli10.1016/j.jappgeo.2013.11.003 ↗
24. Optimization of ERT surveys for monitoring transient hydrological events using perturbation sensitivity and genetic algorithms10.2136/vzj2004.1230 ↗
25. Athanasiou, E., Tsourlos, P., Papazachos, C., and Tsokas, G. (2009, January 7–9). Optimizing Electrical Resistivity Array Configurations by Using a Method Based on the Sensitivity Matrix. Proceedings of the Near Surface 2009—15th EAGE European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Dublin, Ireland.10.3997/2214-4609.20147025 ↗
26. Computation of optimized arrays for 3-D electrical imaging surveys10.1093/gji/ggu357 ↗
27. Optimized arrays for 2-D resistivity survey lines with a large number of electrodes10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.11.011 ↗
28. Optimized survey design for electrical resistivity tomography: Combined optimization of measurement configuration and electrode placement10.1093/gji/ggy128 ↗
29. Methods for Calculating Frechet Derivatives and Sensitivities for the Non-Linear Inverse Problem: A Comparative Study10.1111/j.1365-2478.1990.tb01859.x ↗
30. A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys10.1071/EG03182 ↗
31. Perren, L.J. (2005). Investigating the Performance of Electrical Resistivity Arrays. [Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Tech].
32. Simyrdanis, K., Tsourlos, P., Papadopoulos, N., and Kirkou, S. (2016, January 4–8). Monitoring of contaminant flow using time-lapse optimized 3-D electrical resistivity tomography in a supervised experimental test site. Proceedings of the Near Surface Geoscience 2016-22nd European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Barcelona, Spain.10.3997/2214-4609.201601959 ↗
33. An algorithm for the 3-D Inversion of Tomographic Resistivity and Induced Polarization data: Preliminary Results