journal article·2021-05-10Open access

Locally Optimal Subsampling Strategies for Full Matrix Capture Measurements in Pipe Inspection

Fabian Krieg, Jan Kirchhof, Eduardo Pérez, Thomas Schwender, Florian Römer, Ahmad Osman

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 9

Abstract

In ultrasonic non-destructive testing, array and matrix transducers are being employed for applications that require in-field steerability or which benefit from a higher number of insonification angles. Having many transmit channels, on the other hand, increases the measurement time and renders the use of array transducers unfeasible for many applications. In the literature, methods for reducing the number of required channels compared to the full matrix capture scheme have been proposed. Conventionally, these are based on choosing the aperture that is as wide as possible. In this publication, we investigate a scenario from the field of pipe inspection, where cracks have to be detected in specific areas near the weld. Consequently, the width of the aperture has to be chosen according to the region of interest at hand. On the basis of ray-tracing simulations which incorporate a model of the transducer directivity and beam spread at the interface, we derive application specific measures of the energy distribution over the array configuration for given regions of interest. These are used to determine feasible subsampling schemes. For the given scenario, the validity/quality of the derived subsampling schemes are compared on the basis of reconstructions using the conventional total focusing method as well as sparsity driven-reconstructions using the Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm. The results can be used to effectively improve the measurement time for the given application without notable loss in defect detectability.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Fraunhofer Institute for Nondestructive Testing IZFP, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany

HTW Saar, 66117 Saarbrücken, Germany

Technische Universität Ilmenau, 98693 Ilmenau, Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft · Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Post-processing of the full matrix of ultrasonic transmit–receive array data for non-destructive evaluation10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.002 ↗
2. Ultrasonic imaging algorithms with limited transmission cycles for rapid nondestructive evaluation10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1269 ↗
3. Weston, M. (2012). Advanced Ultrasonic Digital Imaging and Signal Processing for Applications in the Field of Non-Destructive Testing. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester].
4. Efficient data capture and post-processing for real-time imaging using an ultrasonic array10.1063/1.3362500 ↗
5. Hu, H., Du, J., Ye, C., and Li, X. (2018). Ultrasonic Phased Array Sparse-TFM Imaging Based on Sparse Array Optimization and New Edge-Directed Interpolation. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18061830 ↗
6. Zhang, H., Liu, Y., Fan, G., Zhang, H., Zhu, W., and Zhu, Q. (2019). Sparse-TFM Imaging of Lamb Waves for the Near-Distance Defects in Plate-Like Structures. Metals, 9.10.3390/met9050503 ↗
7. Optimal Design of Sparse Array for Ultrasonic Total Focusing Method by Binary Particle Swarm Optimization10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3001947 ↗
8. Pérez, E., Kirchhof, J., Semper, S., Krieg, F., and Römer, F. (2019, January 6–9). Total focusing method with subsampling in space and frequency domain for ultrasound NDT. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Glasgow, UK.10.1109/ULTSYM.2019.8926040 ↗
9. Gershon, Y., Buchris, Y., and Cohen, I. (2020, January 4–8). Greedy sparse array design for optimal localization under spatially prioritized source distribution. Proceedings of the ICASSP 2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ICASSP40776.2020.9053917 ↗
10. Another Look at the Fast Iterative Shrinkage/Thresholding Algorithm (FISTA)10.1137/16M108940X ↗
11. A Model for Multiview Ultrasonic Array Inspection of Small Two-Dimensional Defects10.1109/TUFFC.2019.2909988 ↗
12. Defect detection using ultrasonic arrays: The multi-mode total focusing method10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.10.001 ↗
13. Synthetic aperture imaging using sources with finite aperture: Deconvolution of the spatial impulse response10.1121/1.1575746 ↗
14. Krieg, F., Kirchhof, J., Römer, F., Pandey, R., Ihlow, A., del Galdo, G., and Osman, A. (2018, January 22–25). Progressive online 3-D SAFT processing by matrix structure exploitation. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Kobe, Japan.10.1109/ULTSYM.2018.8579696 ↗
15. Advanced Reflector Characterization with Ultrasonic Phased Arrays in NDE Applications10.1109/TUFFC.2007.424 ↗
16. Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique (SART): A Superior Implementation of the Art Algorithm10.1177/016173468400600107 ↗
17. Wagner, C., and Semper, S. (2017). Fast Linear Transformations in Python. arXiv.
18. Carcreff, E., Laroche, N., Braconnier, D., Duclos, A., and Bourguignon, S. (2017, January 6–9). Improvement of the total focusing method using an inverse problem approach. Proceedings of the IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS) 2017, Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/ULTSYM.2017.8092258 ↗
19. Plane Wave Imaging for ultrasonic non-destructive testing: Generalization to multimodal imaging10.1016/j.ultras.2015.08.008 ↗
20. An iterative ray tracing model for ultrasonic nondestructive testing10.1016/0963-8695(92)90002-X ↗
21. Phased Array Imaging of Complex-Geometry Composite Components10.1109/TUFFC.2017.2726819 ↗
22. Algorithm for computer control of a digital plotter10.1147/sj.41.0025 ↗
23. (2021, March 18). EXTENDE, “CIVA.”. Available online: http://www.extende.com.