journal article·2021-04-12Open access

Reliability and Agreement of Three Devices for Measuring Implant Stability Quotient in the Animal Ex Vivo Model

Monica Blazquez-Hinarejos, Constanza Saka-Herrán, Victor Diez-Alonso, Raul Ayuso-Montero, Eugenio Velasco-Ortega, Jose Lopez-Lopez

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 8

Abstract

Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is the most extended method for measuring implant stability. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) is the measure obtained by different RFA devices; however, inter- and intra-rater reliability and agreement of these instruments remain unknown. Thirty implants were placed in three different pig mandibles. ISQ was measured parallel and perpendicular (lingual) to the peg axis with Osstell® Beacon, Penguin® and MegaISQ® by two different investigators and furthermore, one performed a test-retest. Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the agreement. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.20 to 0.65 for the Osstell® Beacon; 0.57 to 0.86 for the Penguin®; and −0.01 to 0.60 for the MegaISQ®. The highest ISQ values were obtained using Penguin® (66.3) in a parallel measurement; the lowest, using the MegaISQ® (60.1) in a parallel measurement. The highest correlation values with the other devices were obtained by MegaISQ® in a parallel measurement. Osstell® Beacon and MegaISQ® showed lower reliability than Penguin®. Osstell® had good agreement for measuring ISQ both in parallel and perpendicular, and MegaISQ® had the best agreement for measuring ISQ in parallel.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Dentistry), University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain

Department of Odontostomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Dentistry), University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain

Oral Health and Masticatory System Group, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain

Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Seville, 41009 Seville, Spain

Department of Odontostomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Dentistry), Barcelona University Dental Hospital, University of Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain

Funding

Biohorizons-Camlog Ibérica

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Stability and marginal bone level measurements ofunsplinted implants used for mandibular overdentures: A 1-year randomized prospective clinical study comparingearly and conventional loading protocols10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01261.x ↗
2. Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) in relation to jaw bone characteristics during early healing10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01336.x ↗
3. Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01679.x ↗
4. Micromotion of dental implants: Basic mechanical considerations10.1155/2013/265412 ↗
5. Relationship between torque and resonance frequency measurements, performed by resonance frequency analysis, in micromobility of dental implants: An in vitro study10.1097/ID.0000000000000318 ↗
6. Modal analysis for implant stability assessment: Sensitivity of this methodology for different implant designs10.1016/j.dental.2018.05.016 ↗
7. Methods used to assess implant stability: Current status
8. Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01365.x ↗
9. The reliability of anycheck device related to healing abutment diameter10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.83 ↗
10. The functional loading of implants increases their stability: A retrospective clinical study10.1111/cid.12702 ↗
11. Biomechanical evaluation of oversized drilling technique on primary implant stability measured by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis
12. Reliability of the Osstell implant stability quotient and Penguin resonance frequency analysis to evaluate implant stability10.1097/ID.0000000000000766 ↗
13. In vitro comparison of resonance frequency analysis devices to evaluate implant stability of narrow diameter implants at varying drilling speeds in dense artificial bone blocks10.1111/cid.12842 ↗
14. Initial stability measurements of implants using a new magnetic resonance frequency analyzer with titanium transducers: An ex vivo study10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00126 ↗
15. Norton, M.R. (2018). Resonance Frequency Analysis: Agreement and correlation of implant stability quotients between three commercially available instruments. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant.10.11607/jomi.6964 ↗
16. Comparison of implant stability measurements between a resonance frequency analysis device and a modified damping capacity analysis device: An in vitro study10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.56 ↗
17. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 ↗
18. Resonance frequency analysis: Comparing two clinical instruments10.1111/cid.12598 ↗
19. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: I. Instrument positioning, bone structure, implant length10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01878.x ↗
20. Does the Manual Insertion Torque of Smartpegs Affect the Outcome of Implant Stability Quotients (ISQ) During Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA)?10.1186/s40729-019-0195-1 ↗