An in-depth investigation of critical stretch based failure criterion in ordinary state-based peridynamics
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study presents an in-depth investigation of the critical stretch based failure criterion in ordinary state-based peridynamics for both static and dynamic conditions. Seven different cases are investigated to determine the effect of the failure parameter on peridynamic forces between material points and dilatation. Based on crack opening displacement (COD) results from both peridynamics and finite element analysis, it was found that one of the seven cases provides the best agreement between the two approaches. This particular case is further investigated by considering the influence of the discretisation and the horizon sizes on COD and crack propagation speeds. Moreover, PD predictions of COD for PMMA material is analysed with the theory of dynamic fracture mechanics and compared with the fracture experiments. It is shown that the peridynamic model can correctly model, simulate and predict the behaviour of the crack under different loading conditions. Furthermore, the presented PD models capture accurate fracture phenomena, specifically the crack path, branching angles and crack propagation speeds, which are in good agreement with experimental results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. Abraham F, Brodbeck R, Rafey A, Rudge WE (1994) Instability of fracture—a computer-simulation investigation. Phys Rev Lett 73:272–27510.1103/PhysRevLett.73.272 ↗
2. Agwai A, Guven I, Madenci E (2011) Predicting crack propagation with peridynamics: a comparative study. Int J Fract 171:65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-011-9628-410.1007/s10704-011-9628-4 ↗
3. Aliabadi M, Rooke D (1991) Numerical fracture mechanics. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin10.1007/978-94-011-3360-9 ↗
4. Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B, Elkhodary K (2013) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, Hoboken
5. Bobaru F, Hu W (2012) The meaning, selection, and use of the peridynamic horizon and its relation to crack branching in brittle materials. Int J Fract 176:215–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-012-9725-z10.1007/s10704-012-9725-z ↗
6. Bobaru F, Zhang G (2015) Why do cracks branch? A peridynamic investigation of dynamic brittle fracture. Int J Fract 196:59–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-015-0056-810.1007/s10704-015-0056-8 ↗
7. Bobaru F, Yang M, Alves LF et al (2009) Convergence, adaptive refinement, and scaling in 1D peridynamics. Int J Numer Methods Eng 77:852–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme10.1002/nme ↗
8. Bowden FP, Brunton JH, Field JE, Heyes AD (1967) Controlled fracture of brittle solids and interruption of electrical current. Nature 216:38–4210.1038/216038a0 ↗
9. Chandar KR, Knauss WG (1982) Dynamic crack-tip stresses under stress wave loading -A comparison of theory and experiment. Int J Fract 20:209–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0114033610.1007/BF01140336 ↗
10. Charalambides PG, McMeeking RM (1987) Finite element method simulation of crack propagation in a brittle microcracking solid. Mech Mater 6:71–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6636(87)90023-810.1016/0167-6636(87)90023-8 ↗
11. Cotterell B (1965) On brittle fracture paths. Int J Fract Mech 1:96–10310.1007/BF00186747 ↗
12. Döll W (1975) Investigations of the crack branching energy. Int J Fract 11:184–18610.1007/BF00034729 ↗
13. Fineberg J, Gross SP, Marder M, Swinney HL (1992) Instability in the propagation of fast cracks. Am Phys Soc 45:5146–5154. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.284.5418.1233d10.1126/science.284.5418.1233d ↗
14. Fineberg L, Sharon E, Cohen G (2003) Crack front waves in dynamic fracture. Int J Fract 121:55–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102395421118810.1023/A:1023954211188 ↗
15. Freund LB (1998) Dynamic Fracture Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
16. Fries TP, Belytschko T (2010) The extended/generalized finite element method: an overview of the method and its applications. Int J Numer Methods Eng 84:253–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme10.1002/nme ↗
17. Geniaut S, Galenne E (2012) A simple method for crack growth in mixed mode with X-FEM. Int J Solids Struct 49:2094–2106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.04.01510.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.04.015 ↗
18. Ha YD, Bobaru F (2010) Studies of dynamic crack propagation and crack branching with peridynamics. Int J Fract 162:229–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-010-9442-410.1007/s10704-010-9442-4 ↗
19. Ha YD, Bobaru F (2011) Characteristics of dynamic brittle fracture captured with peridynamics. Eng Fract Mech 78:1156–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.11.02010.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.11.020 ↗
20. Huang D, Lu G, Qiao P (2015) An improved peridynamic approach for quasi-static elastic deformation and brittle fracture analysis. Int J Mech Sci 94–95:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.02.01810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.02.018 ↗
21. Hull D (1970) Effect of crazes on the propagation of cracks in polystyrene. J Mater Sci 5:357–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0239779010.1007/BF02397790 ↗
22. Irwin G (1957) Analysis of stress and strains near the end of a crack extension force. J Appl Mech 24:361–36410.1115/1.4011547 ↗
23. Kalthoff JF (1987) Shadow optical method of caustics. In: Kobayashi AS (ed) Handbook on experimental mechanics. Prentice-Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 430–500
24. Kilic B, Madenci E (2010) An adaptive dynamic relaxation method for quasi-static simulations using the peridynamic theory. Theor Appl Fract Mech 53:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2010.08.00110.1016/j.tafmec.2010.08.001 ↗
25. Madenci E, Oterkus E (2014) Peridynamic theory and its applications. Springer Science + Business Media, New York10.1007/978-1-4614-8465-3 ↗
26. Madenci E, Oterkus S (2016) Ordinary state-based peridynamics for plastic deformation according to von Mises yield criteria with isotropic hardening. J Mech Phys Solids. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2015.09.01610.1016/j.jmps.2015.09.016 ↗
27. Mariani S, Perego U (2003) Extended finite element method for quasi-brittle fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58:103–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.76110.1002/nme.761 ↗
28. Menouillard T, Belytschko T (2010) Dynamic fracture with meshfree enriched XFEM. Acta Mech 213:53–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00707-009-0275-z10.1007/s00707-009-0275-z ↗
29. Nicak T, Mutz A, Keim E, Meier G (2015) Application of XFEM to model crack initiation and propagation during a PTS event. Am Soc Mech Eng Press Vessel Pip Div PVP 6A–2015:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP20154518010.1115/PVP201545180 ↗
30. Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three-dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44:1267–1282. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::AID-NME486>3.0.CO;2-710.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990330)44:9<1267::AID-NME486>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
31. Park H, Chen W (2011) Experimental investigation on dynamic crack propagation through interface in glass. Conf Proc Soc Exp Mech Ser 1:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8228-5_1610.1007/978-1-4419-8228-5_16 ↗
32. Ramulu M, Kobayashi AS (1985) Mechanics of crack curving and branching—a dynamic fracture analysis. Int J Fract 27:187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0001796710.1007/BF00017967 ↗
33. Ravi-Chandar K, Knauss WG (1984a) An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: II. Microstructural aspects. Int J Fract 26:65–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0115231310.1007/BF01152313 ↗
34. Ravi-Chandar K, Knauss WG (1984b) An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: I. Crack initiation and arrest. Int J Fract 25:247–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0096346010.1007/BF00963460 ↗
35. Ravi-Chandar K, Knauss WG (1984c) An experimental investigation into dynamic fracture: IV. On the interaction of stress waves with propagating cracks. Int J Fract 26:189–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0114062710.1007/BF01140627 ↗
36. Ren X, Guan X (2017) Three dimensional crack propagation through mesh-based explicit representation for arbitrarily shaped cracks using the extended finite element method. Eng Fract Mech 177:218–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.04.00710.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.04.007 ↗
37. Sharon E, Gross SP, Fineberg J (1995) Local crack branching as a mechanism for instability in dynamic fracture. Phys Rev Lett 74:5096–5099. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.509610.1103/PhysRevLett.74.5096 ↗
38. Sharon E, Gross SP, Fineberg J (1996) Energy dissipation in dynamic fracture. Phys Rev Lett 76:2117–2120. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.211710.1103/PhysRevLett.76.2117 ↗
39. Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids 48:175–20910.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-0 ↗
40. Silling SA, Askari E (2005) A meshfree method based on the peridynamic model of solid mechanics. Comput Struct 83:1526–1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.02610.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.026 ↗
41. Silling SA, Bobaru F (2005) Peridynamic modeling of membranes and fibers. Int J Non Linear Mech 40:395–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2004.08.00410.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2004.08.004 ↗
42. Silling SA, Epton M, Weckner O, Xu J, Askari E (2007) Peridynamic states and constitutive modeling. J Elast 88:151–18410.1007/s10659-007-9125-1 ↗
43. Silling SA, Weckner O, Askari E, Bobaru F (2010) Crack nucleation in a peridynamic solid. Int J Fract 162:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-010-9447-z10.1007/s10704-010-9447-z ↗
44. Sundaram BM, Tippur HV (2018) Dynamic fracture of soda-lime glass: a full-field optical investigation of crack initiation, propagation and branching. J Mech Phys Solids 120:132–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2018.04.01010.1016/j.jmps.2018.04.010 ↗
45. Suzuki S, Nozaki Y, Kimura H (1997) High-speed holographic microscopy for fast-propagating cracks in transparent materials. Appl Opt 36:7224–7233. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.36.00722410.1364/ao.36.007224 ↗
46. Suzuki S, Sakaue K (2004) Measurement of crack opening displacement and energy release rate of rapidly bifurcating cracks by high-speed holographic microscopy. In: Abstr ATEM Int Conf Adv Technol Exp Mech Asian Conf Exp Mech 47. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmeatem.2003.2310.1299/jsmeatem.2003.23 ↗
47. Yoffe EH (1951) LXXV. The moving griffith crack. London Edinburgh Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 42(330):739–75010.1080/14786445108561302 ↗
48. Zhang H, Qiao P (2018a) A state-based peridynamic model for quantitative fracture analysis. Int J Fract 211:217–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-018-0285-810.1007/s10704-018-0285-8 ↗
49. Zhang H, Qiao P (2018b) A coupled peridynamic strength and fracture criterion for open-hole failure analysis of plates under tensile load. Eng Fract Mech 204:103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.09.03710.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.09.037 ↗
50. Zhang Y, Qiao P (2019) A new bond failure criterion for ordinary state-based peridynamic mode II fracture analysis. Int J Fract 215:105–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-018-00341-x10.1007/s10704-018-00341-x ↗
51. Zhou F, Molinari JF, Shioya T (2005) A rate-dependent cohesive model for simulating dynamic crack propagation in brittle materials. Eng Fract Mech 72:1383–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.10.01110.1016/j.engfracmech.2004.10.011 ↗
52. Zi G, Belytschko T (2003) New crack-tip elements for XFEM and applications to cohesive cracks. Int J Numer Methods Eng 57:2221–2240. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.84910.1002/nme.849 ↗