journal article·2021-02-10Open access

Multi-Feature Fusion and Adaptive Kernel Combination for SAR Image Classification

Xiaoying Wu, Xianbin Wen, Haixia Xu, Liming Yuan, Changlun Guo

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 4

Abstract

Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image classification is an important task in remote sensing applications. However, it is challenging due to the speckle embedding in SAR imaging, which significantly degrades the classification performance. To address this issue, a new SAR image classification framework based on multi-feature fusion and adaptive kernel combination is proposed in this paper. Expressing pixel similarity by non-negative logarithmic likelihood difference, the generalized neighborhoods are newly defined. The adaptive kernel combination is designed on them to dynamically explore multi-feature information that is robust to speckle noise. Then, local consistency optimization is further applied to enhance label spatial smoothness during classification. By simultaneously utilizing adaptive kernel combination and local consistency optimization for the first time, the texture feature information, context information within features, generalized spatial information between features, and complementary information among features is fully integrated to ensure accurate and smooth classification. Compared with several state-of-the-art methods on synthetic and real SAR images, the proposed method demonstrates better performance in visual effects and classification quality, as the image edges and details are better preserved according to the experimental results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Advanced Image Fusion Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Computer Science and Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin 300384, China

School of Information Engineering, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang 453003, China

Key Laboratory of Computer Vision and System, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300384, China

Tianjin Key Laboratory of Intelligence Computing and Novel Software Technology, Tianjin 300384, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Major Project of Tianjin · Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin University · Research Project of Tianjin Municipal Education Commission · Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Oliver, C., and Quegan, S. (2004). Understanding Synthetic Aperture Radar Images, SciTech.
2. Development of a Gray-Level Co-Occurrence Matrix-Based Texture Orientation Estimation Method and Its Application in Sea Surface Wind Direction Retrieval From SAR Imagery10.1109/TGRS.2018.2812778 ↗
3. Gabor filter based change detection in SAR images by KI thresholding10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.11.040 ↗
4. Fractal Analysis and Texture Classification of High-Frequency Multiplicative Noise in SAR Sea-Ice Images Based on a Transform- Domain Image Decomposition Method10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2976815 ↗
5. SAR Image Segmentation Using Morphological Attribute Profiles10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-39-2014 ↗
6. Pixel-Based Classification of SAR Images Using Feature Attribute Profiles10.1109/LGRS.2018.2879880 ↗
7. Change Detection of Polarimetric SAR Images Based on the Integration of Improved Watershed and MRF Segmentation Approaches10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2874517 ↗
8. Building Detection in SAR Images Based on Bi-Dimensional Empirical Mode Decomposition Algorithm10.1109/LGRS.2019.2928965 ↗
9. SAR Image Classification by Exploiting Adaptive Contextual Information and Composite Kernels10.1109/LGRS.2018.2821711 ↗
10. Wang, X., Feng, J., Cao, Z., and Min, R. (2017, January 8–12). Polarimetric-spatial classification of PolSAR images based on composite kernel feature fusion. Proceedings of the IEEE Radar Conference 2017, Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/RADAR.2017.7944436 ↗
11. Fusion of multifeature low-rank representation for synthetic aperture radar target configuration recognition10.1109/LGRS.2018.2842068 ↗
12. SAR image classification via hierarchical sparse representation and multisize patch features10.1109/LGRS.2015.2493242 ↗
13. Zhang, W., Xiang, D., and Su, Y. (2020). Fast Multiscale Superpixel Segmentation for SAR Imagery. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 1–5.10.1109/LGRS.2020.3022478 ↗
14. Superpixel Boundary-Based Edge Description Algorithm for SAR Image Segmentation10.1109/JSTARS.2020.2987653 ↗
15. An Improved Superpixel-Level CFAR Detection Method for Ship Targets in High-Resolution SAR Images10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2764506 ↗
16. Target Recognition via Information Aggregation through Dempster–Shafer’s Evidence Theory10.1109/LGRS.2015.2390914 ↗
17. Multi-Feature Weighted Sparse Graph for SAR Image Analysis10.1109/TGRS.2019.2941288 ↗
18. Multi-scale deep feature learning network with bilateral filtering for SAR image classification10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.07.007 ↗
19. Extinction Profiles Fusion for Hyperspectral Images Classification10.1109/TGRS.2017.2768479 ↗
20. Cluster-Based Tensorial Semisupervised Discriminant Analysis for Feature Extraction of SAR Images10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2924676 ↗
21. Comparison and fusion of co-occurrence, Gabor and MRF texture features for classification of SAR sea-ice imagery10.1080/07055900.2001.9649675 ↗
22. Suppression of speckle in synthetic aperture radar images using wavelet10.1080/014311698216125 ↗
23. Performance Analysis Survey of Various SAR Image Despeckling Techniques
24. A Kernel Clustering Algorithm with Fuzzy Factor: Application to SAR Image Segmentation10.1109/LGRS.2013.2292820 ↗
25. A mathematical theory of communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x ↗
26. Chari, S.K., Gupta, A., Gupta, P., and Mohan, J. (2018, January 12). Threshold selection in image segmentation using parametric entropy measures. Proceedings of the 2017 Fourth International Conference on Image Information Processing (ICIIP), Shimla, India.10.1109/ICIIP.2017.8313724 ↗
27. Superpixel Segmentation of Polarimetric SAR Images Based on Integrated Distance Measure and Entropy Rate Method
28. Liu, M., Tuzel, O., Ramalingam, S., and Chellappa, R. (2011, January 20). Entropy rate superpixel segmentation. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2011, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995323 ↗
29. Yoshiyama, F., Uenohara, S., Nishijima, K., Hioka, Y., and Furuya, K. (2015, January 6). Log-likelihood method to select initial values of multichannel non-negative matrix factorization. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Taipei, Taiwan.10.1109/ICCE-TW.2015.7216813 ↗
30. Deep Metric Learning for Visual Understanding: An Overview of Recent Advances10.1109/MSP.2017.2732900 ↗
31. Parameter-free fast pixelwise non-local means denoising10.5201/ipol.2014.120 ↗
32. Principal component analysis10.1002/wics.101 ↗
33. Luis, G., Raydonal, O., and Alejandro, F. (2017). Unassisted Quantitative Evaluation of Despeckling Filters. Remote Sens., 9.10.3390/rs9040389 ↗
34. Qu, G., Yu, Q., and Wang, Y. (2013, January 27). An improved method for SAR image coastline detection based on despeckling and SVM. Proceedings of the IET International Radar Conference 2013, Xi’an, China.
35. A Spatial Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm with Kernel Metric Based on Immune Clone for SAR Image Segmentation