Selection of Co-Belonging Ceramic Fragments from Archaeological Excavations and Their Location in Vase Bodies from Thermoremanent Magnetization
Source abstract
Abstract
Selection of co-belonging fragments from the numerous ceramic findings of an archaeological excavation based exclusively on the experience and patience of the conservators remains a difficult process of questionable effectiveness. While the screening of the fragments is a central prerequisite and the most important stage of the process of vase reconstruction, established methods based on scientific criteria and guaranteed efficiency for the detection of co-belonging ceramic fragments suggested in the bibliography do not exist. On the contrary, for methods dealing with the assembly of vases from co-belonging fragments, which is a secondary process that can be done more easily and effectively in an empirical way, there exist numerous studies based on fragment morphology. However, even these are also not implemented because of the time requirements, sheer volume and complexity of the proposed methods, in order for them to be applicable in practice. The proposed methods in this paper are based on thermoremanent magnetization (A/m), which is calculated from the weak magnetic field measurements by a fluxgate-sensor/magnet apparatus forming a three-dimensional orthogonal system. Experimental measurements from fragments of six vases show that the magnetization magnitude of co-belonging fragments display similar values, despite the magnetic anisotropy of the ceramic material, since these belong to vases made of the same clay and fired under the same conditions. This is the criterion for finding ceramic fragments of the same vase from archaeological excavations. The thermoremanent magnetism directionality of fragments, which is aligned along the geomagnetic field at the same place and time during the vase firing process, as it is configured by their rotational symmetry, defines the position of the fragments on the body of the six vases. The shape of the original vase can be reconstructed when only a few non adjacent fragments are available. The proposed measurement apparatus can be used for the construction of a useable portable magnetometer specialized for ceramic surface measurements to achieve the above objectives.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction · Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis · Archaeological Research and Protection
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mineral Resources Engineering, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, Greece
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Technical University of Crete, 73100 Chania, Greece
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. (2019, June 22). Archaeomagnetic Applications for the Rescue of Cultural Heritage-AARCH, 2002–2006. Available online: http://dourbes.meteo.be/aarch.net/onlytxt/no.frame.html.
2. Magnetization of Shards as an Assistance to the Reconstruction of Pottery Vessels10.1179/sic.1975.20.3.013 ↗
3. Castañeda, A.G., Brown, B., Rusinkiewicz, S., Funkhouser, T., and Weyrich, T. (2011, January 18–21). Global consistency in the automatic assembly of fragmented artefacts. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Virtual Reality Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST, Prato, Italy.
4. Computerized morphological classification of ceramics10.1016/j.jas.2011.05.023 ↗
5. Cooper, D.B., Willis, A., Andrews, S., Baker, J., Cao, Y., Han, D., Kang, K., Leymarie, F.F., and Orriols, X. (2001, January 28–30). Assembling virtual pots from 3D measurements of their fragments. Proceedings of the Conference on Virtual Reality Archeology and Cultural Heritage, Athens, Greece.10.1145/584993.585032 ↗
6. Willis, A., Orriols, X., and Cooper, D.B. (2003, January 16–22). Accurately estimating sherd 3D surface geometry with application to pot reconstruction. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, Madison, WI, USA.10.1109/CVPRW.2003.10014 ↗
7. Willis, A.R., and Cooper, D.B. (July, January 27). Bayesian assembly of 3d axially symmetric shapes from fragments. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Diego, CA, USA.
8. Maiza, C., and Gaildrat, V. (2019, August 29). Automatic Classification of Archaeological Potsherds. Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3c95/82c3e562b44e7d61dc0fd3487ea3dc977ff3.pdf?_ga=2.206671379.1607405463.1564404747-123545983.1564404747.
9. Belenguer, C.S., and Vidal, E.V. (2012, January 2–5). Archaeological Fragment Characterization and 3D Reconstruction based on Projective GPU Depth Maps. Proceedings of the IEEE 18th International Conference on VSMM, Milan, Italy.10.1109/VSMM.2012.6365935 ↗
10. Cohen, F., Zhang, Z., and Jeppson, P. (2010, January 13–18). Virtual reconstruction of archaeological vessels using convex hulls of surface markings. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPRW.2010.5543528 ↗
11. Melero, F.J., Torres, J.C., and León, A. (2003, January 5–7). On the interactive 3D reconstruction of iberian vessels. Proceedings of the 4th International conference on Virtual Reality Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritage, Brighton, UK.
12. A flexible approach to reassembling thin artifacts of unknown geometry10.1016/j.culher.2012.02.017 ↗
13. Papaioannou, G., Karabassi, E.A., and Theoharis, T. (2000, January 3–5). Automatic Reconstruction of Archaeological Finds-A Graphics Approach. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference Computer Graphics and Artificial Intelligence, Limoges, France.
14. Reconstruction of three-dimensional objects through matching of their parts10.1109/34.982888 ↗
15. Automatic reconstruction of broken 3-D surfaces objects10.1016/S0097-8493(99)00075-8 ↗
16. Mara, H., Kampel, M., and Sablatnig, R. (2002, January 10–11). Preprocessing of 3D-Data for Classification of Archaeological Fragments in an Automated System. Proceedings of the 26th Workshop of the Austrian Association for Pattern Recognition, Vision with Non-Traditional Sensors, (ÖAGM/AAPR), Graz, Austria.
17. Mara, H., and Sablatnig, R. (2006, January 14–16). Orientation of Fragments of Rotationally Symmetrical 3D-Shapes for Archaeological Documentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Third International Symposium on 3D Data Processing, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.10.1109/3DPVT.2006.105 ↗
18. Measuring the information content of fracture lines10.1007/s11263-005-3226-8 ↗
19. Hlaváčková-Schindler, K., Kampel, M., and Sablatnig, R. (2001, January 28–30). Fitting of a closed planar curve representing a profile of an archaeological fragment. Proceedings of the Conference on Virtual reality, archeology and cultural heritage, Glyfada, Greece.10.1145/584993.585034 ↗
20. Kashihara, K. (2012, January 14–17). Three-dimensional Reconstruction of Artifacts Based on a Hybrid. Genetic Algorithm. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Seoul, Korea.10.1109/ICSMC.2012.6377842 ↗
21. Son, K., Almeida, E.B., and Cooper, D.B. (2013, January 23–28). Axially Symmetric 3D Pots Configuration System Using Axis of Symmetry and Break Curve. Proceedings of the IEEE 26th Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Portland, OR, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2013.40 ↗
22. Kampel, M., and Sablatnig, R. (2003, January 16–22). Profile-based Pottery Reconstruction. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, Madison WI, USA.10.1109/CVPRW.2003.10007 ↗
23. Kampel, M., and Sablatnig, R. (2004, January 26–26). On 3D mosaicing of rotationally symmetric ceramic fragments. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Cambridge, UK.10.1109/ICPR.2004.1334157 ↗
24. An Automated Pottery Archival and Reconstruction System10.1002/vis.310 ↗
25. Kampel, M., Sablatnig, R., and Mara, H. (2005, January 13). Robust 3d Reconstruction of Archaeological Pottery Based on Concentric Circular Rills. Proceedings of the 6th International Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services, Monterux, Switzerland.
26. Zhou, M., Geng, G., Wu, Z., and Shui, W. (2009, January 22–26). A Virtual Restoration System for Broken Pottery. Proceedings of the CAA Conference 37th Computer applications and quantitative methods in archaeology, Williamsburg, VA, USA.
27. Smith, P., Bespalov, D., Shokoufandeh, A., and Jeppson, P. (2010, January 22–26). Classification of archaeological ceramic fragments using texture and color descriptors. Proceedings of the IEEE, Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPRW.2010.5543523 ↗
28. Reassembling fractured objects by geometric matching10.1145/1141911.1141925 ↗
29. Halíř, R. An Automatic Estimation of the Axis of Rotation of Fragments of Archaeological Pottery: A Multi-Step Model-Based Approach. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Interactive Digital Media.
30. Sablatnig, R., and Menard, C. (1997, January 5–9). 3D Reconstruction of archaeological pottery using profile primitives. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Synthetic-Natural Hybrid Coding and Three-Dimensional Imaging, Rhodes, Greece.
31. Andrews, S., and Laidlaw, D.H. (2002, January 27–30). Toward a Framework for Assembling Broken Pottery Vessels. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Alberta, Canada.
32. Cao, Y., and Mumford, D. (2002, January 25–28). Geometric structure estimation of axially symmetric pots from small fragments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing, Pattern Recognition and Applications, Creta, Greece.
33. Lu, Y., Gardner, H., Jin, H., Liu, N., Hawkins, R., and Farrington, I. (2007, January 3–5). Interactive Reconstruction of Archaeological Fragments in a Collaborative Environment. Proceedings of the IEEE 9th Biennial Conference of the Australian Pattern Recognition Society on Digital Image Computing Techniques and Applications, Glenelg, Australia.10.1109/DICTA.2007.4426771 ↗
34. Collinson, D.W. (1983). Methods in Rock Magnetism and Palaeomagnetism: Techniques and Instrumentation, London, Chapman and Hall.10.1007/978-94-015-3979-1 ↗
35. Experimental Methods in Rock Magnetism and Paleomagmetism
36. A complete result magnetometer for measuring the remanent magnetization of rocks10.1111/j.1365-246X.1971.tb02188.x ↗
37. (2019, April 22). Available online: http://bartington.jp/Literaturepdf/Datasheets/Mag-03%20DS0013.pdf.
38. Armen, G.B. Phase Sensitive Detection: The lock-in Amplifier, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennesse Knoxville. Available online: http://server1.phys.utk.edu/labs/modphys/Lock-In%20Amplifier%20Experiment.pdf.
39. (2019, April 22). Available online: https://www.thinksrs.com/downloads/pdfs/manuals/SR830m.pdf.
40. Purcell, E. (2004). Electricity Magnetism, University publications of the National Technical University of Athens. [2nd ed.].
41. (2019, April 22). Available online: https://www.math.ubc.ca/~anstee/math104/104newtonmethod.pdf.
42. Tarling, D.H. (1983). Paleomagnetism, Springer. [1st ed.].10.1007/978-94-009-5955-2 ↗
43. Chikazumi, S. (2009). Physics of Ferromagnetism, Oxford science publications. [2nd ed.].
44. McElhinny, M.W., and McFadden, P.L. (1998). The Magnetic Field of the Earth: Paleomagnetism, the Core, and the Deep Mantle, Academic Press. [3rd ed.].
45. Eighmy, J.L., and Sternberg, R.S. (1990). Archaeomagnetic Dating, Arizona Press University. [3rd ed.].
46. Archaeomagnetism, methodology and applications: Implementation and practice of the archaeomagnetic method in France and Bulgaria10.1179/eja.1999.2.3.365 ↗
47. Curie, P. (1895). Propriétés magnétiques des corps à diverses temperatures, Gauthier-Villars et fils. Available online: https://archive.org/details/propritsmagntiq00curigoog/page/n7.
48. Morrish, A.H. (2001). The Physical Principles of Magnetism, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, IEEE Press. [3rd ed.].10.1109/9780470546581 ↗
49. Modified Mineral. Phases During Clay Ceramic Firing10.1346/CCMN.2015.0630506 ↗
50. From the kilns to the fair: Producing building materials at Faragola and Canusium (northern Apulia, Italy)10.1007/s12520-015-0249-0 ↗
51. Geosources for ceramic production: The clays from the Neogene–Quaternary Albegna Basin (southern Tuscany)10.1016/j.clay.2014.01.012 ↗
52. Cullity, B.D., and Graham, C.D. (2008). Introduction to Magnetic Materials, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, John Willey & sons Puplication. [2nd ed.].10.1002/9780470386323 ↗
53. Ahrens, T.J. (1995). Magnetic Properties of Rocks and Minerals. Rock Physics & Phase Relations A Handbook of Physical Constants.10.1029/RF003 ↗
54. Dearing, J. (1994). Environmental Magnetic Susceptibility, Chi Publishing. [2nd ed.]. Available online: https://gmw.com/magnetic_properties/pdf/Om0409%20J_Dearing_Handbook_iss7.pdf.
55. Cornell, R.M., and Schwertmann, U. (2003). The Iron Oxides, WILEY-VCH, Verlag, GmbH & Co. [2nd ed.].10.1002/3527602097 ↗
56. High-Temperature Phase Development in Illitic Clays
57. Mineralogy and Genesis of the Wealdian Sediments in the Southern Cordillera Iberica (Spain)10.1346/CCMN.1975.0230409 ↗
58. Mineralogical applications of the analytical SEM in archaeology10.1180/minmag.1987.051.359.03 ↗
59. Trends in the formation of crystalline and amorphous phases during the firing of claybricks
60. Firing process of natural clays. Some microtextures and related phase compositions10.1016/S0040-6031(98)00458-4 ↗
61. Carbonate and silicate phase reactions during ceramic firing10.1127/0935-1221/2001/0013-0621 ↗
62. Firing transformations of mixtures of clays containing illite, kaolinite and calcium carbonate used by Ornamental Tile Industries10.1016/0169-1317(90)90031-J ↗
63. Olin, J.S., Franklin, A., and Smithsonian, D. (1982). Phase Analysis and its Significance for Technology and Origin. Archaeological Ceramics, Smithsonian Institution Press.
64. TEM study of mineral transformations in fired carbonated clays: Relevance to brickmaking10.1180/0009855043930138 ↗
65. Zhu, Z., Jiang, T., Li, G., Guo, Y., and Yang, Y. (2019, August 29). Thermodynamics of Reactions Among Al2O3, CaO,SiO2 and Fe2O3 during Roasting Processes. Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/books/thermodynamics-interaction-studies-solids-liquids-and-gases/thermodynamics-of-reactions-among-al2o3-cao-sio2-and-fe2o3-during-roasting-processes.
66. (2019, April 22). Available online: http://earthref.org/MAGIC/books/Tauxe/Essentials/WebBook3ch6.html#x8-530006.
67. Christine, R. (2005). Archaeological Ceramics of the NW Peloponnese: Petrographic, Mineralogical, Geochemical and Archaeometric Approach, Department of Geology, University of Patras. Available online: www.geology.upatras.gr/images/pdf/pro/petrografia/Rathossi_CV.pdf.
68. Effect of reducing atmosphere on minerals and iron oxides developed in fired clays: The role of Ca10.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb10561.x ↗
69. Influence of microstructure on firing colour of clays10.1016/S0169-1317(09)90007-2 ↗
70. The colours of Ca-rich ceramic pastes: Origin and characterization10.1016/S0169-1317(98)00024-6 ↗
71. Shortland, A.J., Freestone, I.C., and Rehren, T. (2009). The Emergence of Ceramic Technology and Its Evolution aw Revealed with the Use of Scientific Techniques, Oxbow Books. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228776265_The_Emergence_of_Ceramic_Technology_and_its_Evolution_as_Revealed_with_the_use_of_Scientific_Techniques.
72. Fine particle magnetic mineralogy of archaeological ceramics10.1088/1742-6596/17/1/020 ↗