Integration of Freeplay-Induced Limit Cycles Based On a State Space Iterating Scheme
Source abstract
Abstract
Time integration is commonly used to obtain accurate system responses, such as the limit cycle oscillations (LCOs) for an aeroelastic system with freeplay. However, the integrations that start with various initial conditions (I.C.s) are usually studied case by case, so only a few system states can possibly be focused on. This paper proposes a state space iterating (SSI) scheme to find LCO solutions using time integration by using another method. First, a large number of arbitrary I.C. cases are used for time integrations, but only a very short integration time is required for each I.C. case. Second, system behaviors are depicted visually through a method that combines a modified Poincaré map and Lorenz map, in which the LCO solutions are found as fixed points via visual inspections. To verify the SSI scheme’s ability to find LCOs, a typical plunge–pitch wing section is established numerically. Time integrations with both the classic scheme and the proposed SSI scheme are carried out. The LCO results of the SSI scheme are well-aligned with those from the classic scheme. The SSI scheme visualizes the patterns of system responses using arbitrary I.C. cases and analyzes the LCO stability, which provides more mathematical insights into an aeroelastic system with freeplay.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Grigorios, D. (2017). Introduction to Nonlinear Aeroelasticitiy, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2. Modeling and identification of freeplay nonlinearity10.1016/j.jsv.2011.12.021 ↗
3. Edouard, V., Grigorios, D., and Gustavo, D.B.R. (2017). Two-domain and three-domain limit cycles in a typical aeroelastic system with freeplay in pitch. J. Fluids Struct., 89–107.10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.11.019 ↗
4. Dynamic analysis of an aeroelastic airfoil with freeplay nonlinearity by precise integration method based on Pade approximation10.1007/s11071-017-3577-z ↗
5. Zhong, W.X., and Williams, F.W. (1994). A precise time step integration method. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., 427–430.10.1243/PIME_PROC_1994_208_148_02 ↗
6. Wang, M.F., and Au, F.T.K. (2009). On the precise integration methods based on Padé approximations. Comput. Struct., 380–390.10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.11.004 ↗
7. On the numerical computation of Poincaré maps
8. Padmanabhan Madhusudan, A., Dowell, E.H., and Pasiliao Crystal, L. (2018). Computational study of aeroelastic limit cycles due to localized structural nonlinearities. J. Aircraft, 1–11.10.2514/1.C034645 ↗
9. Flutter and limit-cycle oscillations for a wing-store model with freeplay10.2514/1.12650 ↗
10. Tang, D.M., and Dowell Earl, H. (1992). Flutter and stall response of a helicopter blade with structural nonlinearity. J. Aircraft, 25–45.10.2514/3.46268 ↗
11. Computational/Experimental aeroelastic study for a horizontal-tail model with free play10.2514/1.J051781 ↗
12. Simulation of aeroelastic limit-cycle oscillations of aircraft wings with stores10.2514/1.J052843 ↗
13. Shooting-based complete bifurcation prediction for aeroelastic systems with freeplay10.2514/1.C031139 ↗
14. Dimitriadis, G. (2011, January 4–7). Complete Bifurcation Behaviour of Aeroelastic Systems with Freeplay. Proceedings of the 52nd AIAA/ASCE/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Denver, CO, USA.10.2514/6.2011-2142 ↗
15. Mémoire sur les courbes définies par une équation différentielle (I)
16. Lawrence, P. (1990). Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Springer. [2nd ed.].
17. Monfared, Z., Afsharnezhad, Z., and Esfahani, J.A. (2017). Flutter, limit cycle oscillation, bifurcation and stability regions of an airfoil with discontinuous freeplay nonlinearity. Nonlinear Dynam., 1965–1986.10.1007/s11071-017-3773-x ↗
18. Postinstability behavior of a two-dimensional airfoil with a structural nonlinearity10.2514/3.46664 ↗
19. Representation and analysis of control surface freeplay nonlinearity10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2012.02.003 ↗
20. Wei, H., Yang, Z., and Gu, Y. (2017). The nonlinear aeroelastic characteristics of a folding wing with cubic stiffness. J. Sound Vib., 22–39.10.1016/j.jsv.2017.04.002 ↗
21. Deterministic nonperiodic flow10.1175/1520-0469(1963)020<0130:DNF>2.0.CO;2 ↗
22. Strogatz Steven, H. (2018). Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos, CRC Press. [2nd ed.].10.1201/9780429492563 ↗
23. The Lorenz attractor exists
24. Tucker, W. (2002). A rigorous ODE solver and Smale’s 14th problem. Found. Comput. Math., 53–117.10.1007/s002080010018 ↗
25. The Lorenz attractor exists10.1038/35023206 ↗
26. Waht’s new on Lorenz strange attractors10.1007/BF03025276 ↗
27. Theodorsen, T. (1935). General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter: Technical Report 496, NACA.
28. Airplane Math Modeling and Active Aeroelastic Control Design
29. Design for active flutter suppression and gust alleviation using state-space aeroelastic modeling10.2514/3.57379 ↗
30. Tiffany, S.H., and Mordechay, K. (1989). Aeroservoelastic modeling and applications using minimum-state approximations of the unsteady aerodynamics, NASA Technical Memorandum.10.2514/6.1989-1188 ↗
31. Edwards, J.W., Ashley, H., and Breakwell, J.V. (1979). Unsteady aerodynmic modeling for arbitrary motions. AIAA J., 365–374.10.2514/3.7348 ↗