Show source-provided references
2. Surgical treatment of basicervical intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with cephalomeduallary hip nails
10.1111/os.12038 ↗5. A different treatment modality fortrochanteric fractures of the femur in surgical high-risk patients: A clinical studyof 44 patients with 21-month follow-up
10.1007/s00402-003-0578-9 ↗8. Intramedullary versus extramedullary internal fixation for unstable intertrochanteric fracture, a meta-analysis
10.1016/j.aott.2018.02.009 ↗12. The effect of local bone mineral density on the rate of mechanical failure after surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: A prospective multicentre cohort study including 249 patients
10.1007/s00402-015-2211-0 ↗13. Locking plate fixation versus antegrade nailing of 3-and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in patients without osteoporosis. Comparative retrospective study of 63 cases
10.1016/j.otsr.2014.09.021 ↗14. Prospective randomized study comparing two cephalomedullary nails for elderly intertrochanteric fractures: Zimmer natural nail versus proximal femoral nail antirotation II
10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.011 ↗15. Treatment with helical blade Cephalomedullary nail for two-part Basicervical proximal femoral fracture in elderly patients: A retrospective observational study
10.1177/2151458517743327 ↗16. Helical blade versus sliding hip screw for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: A biomechanical evaluation
10.1016/j.injury.2006.06.008 ↗17. Fixation of subtrochanteric fractures: Does a technical optimization of the dynamic hip screw application improve the results?
10.1007/s11751-009-0058-z ↗19. Treatment of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur: Reduction on the traction table and fixation with dynamic condylar screw
10.1007/BF00441620 ↗20. A retrospective analysis of the InterTan nail and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation-Asia in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures in the elderly
10.1186/s13018-016-0344-7 ↗24. Biomechanical comparison between standard and inclined screw orientation in dynamic hip screw side-plate fixation: The lift-off phenomenon
25. Lee, E.S., Goh, T.S., Heo, J.Y., Kim, Y.J., Lee, S.E., Kim, Y.H., and Lee, C.S. (2019). Experimental Evaluation of Screw Pullout Force and Adjacent Bone Damage According to Pedicle Screw Design Parameters in Normal and Osteoporotic Bones. Appl. Sci., 9.
10.3390/app9030586 ↗32. Cracking development prediction in concrete gravity dams using concrete damaged plasticity model
34. Birtel, V., and Mark, P. (2006, January 23–25). Parameterised finite element modelling of RC beam shear failure. Proceedings of the 2006 ABAQUS Users’ Conference, Boston, MA, USA.
35. Bergmann, G., Bender, A., Dymke, J., Duda, G., and Damm, P. (2016). Standardized loads acting in hip implants. PLoS ONE, 15.
10.1371/journal.pone.0155612 ↗36. Schaeffer, E.K., and Mulpuri, K. (2019). Anatomy and Physiology of the Pediatric Hip. Pediatric Adolesc. Hip., 29–51.
10.1007/978-3-030-12003-0_2 ↗