journal article·2020-11-26Open access

Identifying the Risk Factors in the Context-of-Use of Electric Kick Scooters Based on a Latent Dirichlet Allocation

Kyung-Jun Lee, Chan Hyeok Yun, Ilsun Rhiu, Myung Hwan Yun

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 23

Abstract

Accidents related to electric kick scooters, which are widespread globally, are increasing rapidly. However, most of the research on them concentrates on reporting accident status and injury patterns. Therefore, while it is necessary to analyze safety issues from the user’s perspective, interviewing or conducting a survey with those involved in an accident may not return enough data due to respondents’ memory loss. Therefore, this study aims to identify the risk factors in the context-of-use for electric kick scooters based on a topic modeling method. We collected data on risk episodes involving electric kick scooters experienced by users in their daily lives and applied text mining to analyze text responses describing the risk episodes systematically. A total of 423 risk episodes are collected from 21 electric kick scooter users in South Korea over two months from an online survey. The text responses describing risk episodes were classified into nine topics based on a latent Dirichlet allocation. From the result, four risk factors can be identified by analyzing the derived topics and the cause of the risk according to the context. Moreover, we suggested design improvement directions. This study can be helpful for designing safer electric kick scooters considering safety.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Safety Warnings and Signage · Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility · Environmental Engineering and Cultural Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial Engineering & Institute for Industrial System Innovation, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea

Division of Future Convergence (HCI Science Major), Dongduk Women’s University, Seoul 02748, Korea

Funding

Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Motorized scooter injuries in the era of scooter-shares: A review of the national electronic surveillance system10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.049 ↗
2. Irfan, U. (2018). Electric Scooters’ Sudden Invasion of American Cities, Explained, Vox.
3. New peril on our roads: A retrospective study of electric scooter-related injuries10.11622/smedj.2019083 ↗
4. The electric scooter: A surging new mode of transportation that comes with risk to riders10.1080/15389588.2019.1709176 ↗
5. Samsung Traffic Safety Research Institute (2019). Expert of Traffic Accident Prevention Series, Samsung Traffic Safety Research Institute.
6. The new recreational transportation on the street: Personal mobility, is it safe?10.20408/jti.2018.040 ↗
7. Injuries associated with standing electric scooter use10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7381 ↗
8. Noguchi, S., and Jeong, S. (2013, January 20–23). Evaluation of rapid rider weight shifting behavior for a stand-riding-type self-balancing personal mobility vehicle: Pilot study. Proceedings of the 2013 13th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS 2013), Gwangju, Korea.10.1109/ICCAS.2013.6704119 ↗
9. Yokota, S., Chugo, D., Hashimoto, H., and Kawabata, K. (2014, January 25–29). The personal mobility interface including human twisting motion. Proceedings of the 2014 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Edinburgh, UK.10.1109/ROMAN.2014.6926221 ↗
10. Using naturalistic data to assess e-cyclist behavior10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.003 ↗
11. Comparative analysis of risky behaviors of electric bicycles at signalized intersections10.1080/15389588.2014.952724 ↗
12. UL (2017). UL 2272 and the Safety of Personal e-Mobility Devices, Underwriters Laboratories (UL).
13. Text mining for information systems researchers: An annotated topic modeling tutorial
14. An ontology-based text-mining method to cluster proposals for research project selection10.1109/TSMCA.2011.2172205 ↗
15. Text mining and visualization tools–impressions of emerging capabilities10.1016/j.wpi.2008.01.007 ↗
16. Mining affective experience for a kansei design study on a recliner10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.014 ↗
17. Exploring user experience of smartphones in social media: A mixed-method analysis10.1080/10447318.2018.1471572 ↗
18. Text classification method based on self-training and LDA topic models10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.020 ↗
19. Wang, S.-H., Ding, Y., Zhao, W., Huang, Y.-H., Perkins, R., Zou, W., and Chen, J.J. (2016). Text mining for identifying topics in the literatures about adolescent substance use and depression. BMC Public Health, 16.10.1186/s12889-016-2932-1 ↗
20. Usability: A critical analysis and a taxonomy
21. Bevan, N., Carter, J., Earthy, J., Geis, T., and Harker, S. (2016). New ISO Standards for usability, usability reports and usability measures. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-39510-4_25 ↗
22. Seol, M.-S. (2005). Perception of Safety and Usability of Powered Hand Tools. [Master’s Thesis, West Virginia University].
23. Wegge, K.P., and Zimmermann, D. (2007, January 22–27). Accessibility, usability, safety, ergonomics: Concepts, models, and differences. Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction, Beijing, China.10.1007/978-3-540-73279-2_33 ↗
24. ISO (2006). ISO 20282-1:2006 Ease of operation of everyday products. Part 1: Design Requirements for Context of Use and User Characteristics, ISO.
25. ISO (2018). ISO 9241-11:2018 Ergonomics of human-system interaction. Part 210: Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems, ISO.
26. Stories of experience and narrative inquiry10.2307/1176100 ↗
27. Giovannoli, R. (2020, November 26). The Narrative Method of Inquiry, Second Candidacy Essay. Available online: http://www.sonic.net/~rgiovan/essay.2.PDF.
28. Mitchell, M.C., and Egudo, M. (2003). A Review of Narrative Methodology.10.1037/e426492005-001 ↗
29. Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., and Martens, J.-B. (2009, January 4–9). User experience over time: An initial framework. Proceedings of the 2009 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Boston, MA, USA.10.1145/1518701.1518814 ↗
30. Ayuso-Mateos, J.L., Miret, M., Caballero, F.F., Olaya, B., Haro, J.M., Kowal, P., and Chatterji, S. (2013). Multi-country evaluation of affective experience: Validation of an abbreviated version of the day reconstruction method in seven countries. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0061534 ↗
31. UX Curve: A method for evaluating long-term user experience10.1016/j.intcom.2011.06.005 ↗
32. Defining user value: A case study of a smartphone10.1016/j.ergon.2013.04.005 ↗
33. Latent dirichlet allocation
34. Tsolmon, B., and Lee, K.-S. (2014, January 6–11). An event extraction model based on timeline and user analysis in latent dirichlet allocation. Proceedings of the 2014 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, Queensland, Australia.10.1145/2600428.2609541 ↗
35. Röder, M., Both, A., and Hinneburg, A. (2015, January 2–6). Exploring the space of topic coherence measures. Proceedings of the 2015 Eighth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Shanghai, China.10.1145/2684822.2685324 ↗
36. Santosh, D.T., Vardhan, B.V., and Ramesh, D. (2016, January 27–28). Extracting product features from reviews using Feature Ontology Tree applied on LDA topic clusters. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing (IACC), Bhimavaram, India.10.1109/IACC.2016.39 ↗
37. Chuang, J., Ramage, D., Manning, C., and Heer, J. (2012, January 5–10). Interpretation and trust: Designing model-driven visualizations for text analysis. Proceedings of the 2012 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Austin, TX, USA.10.1145/2207676.2207738 ↗
38. Sievert, C., and Shirley, K. (2014, January 27). LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Interactive Language Learning, Visualization, and Interfaces, Baltimore, MD, USA.10.3115/v1/W14-3110 ↗