OPF/PMMA Cage System as an Alternative Approach for the Treatment of Vertebral Corpectomy
Source abstract
Abstract
The spinal column is the most common site for bone metastasis. Vertebral metastases with instability have historically been treated with corpectomy of the affected vertebral body and adjacent intervertebral discs, and have more recently been treated with separation surgery. With demographics shifting towards an elderly population, a less-invasive surgical approach is necessary for the repair of vertebral defects. We modified a previously reported expandable hollow cage composed of an oligo[poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate] (OPF) containment system that could be delivered via a posterior-only approach. Then, the polymer of interest, poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement, was injected into the lumen of the cage after expansion to form an OPF/PMMA cage. We compared six different cage formulations to account for vertebral body and defect size, and performed a cage characterization via expansion kinetics and mechanical testing evaluations. Additionally, we investigated the feasibility of the OPF/PMMA cage in providing spine stability via kinematic analyses. The in-vitro placement of the implant using our OPF/PMMA cage system showed improvement and mechanical stability in a flexion motion. The results demonstrated that the formulation and technique presented in the current study have the potential to improve surgical outcomes in minimally invasive procedures on the spine.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques · Management of metastatic bone disease · Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA
Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
Funding
National Institutes of Health
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Surgical management of spinal metastases10.1634/theoncologist.9-2-188 ↗
2. The treatment of spinal metastases
3. Surgical management of metastatic spinal tumors10.1177/107327481201900206 ↗
4. Survival in patients operated on for pathologic fracture: Implications for end-of-life orthopedic care10.1200/JCO.2005.08.104 ↗
5. Biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. Laboratory investigation10.3171/SPI/2008/8/4/341 ↗
6. Comparison of allograft bone and titanium cages for vertebral body replacement in the thoracolumbar spine: A biomechanical study
7. A systematic review of the use of expandable cages in the cervical spine Comments10.1007/s10143-015-0649-8 ↗
8. Vertebral body replacement with an expandable cage for reconstruction after spinal tumor resection10.3171/foc.2003.15.5.8 ↗
9. Compressive strength of autologous and allogenous bone grafts for thoracolumbar and cervical spine fusion10.1097/00007632-199015100-00017 ↗
10. Use of Expandable Cages in Metastasis to the Spine10.29046/JHNJ.004.4.002 ↗
11. Prospective Comparison of Autograft vs. Allograft for Adult Posterolateral Lumbar Spine Fusion—Differences among Freeze-Dried, Frozen, and Mixed Grafts10.1097/00002517-199504000-00007 ↗
12. Anterior approaches to the thoracic spine in patients with cancer: Indications and results10.1016/S0003-4975(97)01034-5 ↗
13. Anterior versus posterior decompression for symptomatic spinal metastasis10.1017/S0317167100026871 ↗
14. Spinal metastasis in the elderly10.1007/s00586-003-0609-9 ↗
15. A New Vertebral Body Replacement Strategy Using Expandable Polymeric Cages10.1089/ten.tea.2016.0246 ↗
16. A dynamic method for in vitro multisegment spine testing10.1016/j.otsr.2010.01.006 ↗
17. Biomechanical evaluation of posterior lumbar dynamic stabilization: An in vitro comparison between Universal Clamp and Wallis systems10.1007/s00586-010-1641-1 ↗
18. Effect of Off-Axis Fluoroscopy Imaging on Two-Dimensional Kinematics in the Lumbar Spine: A Dynamic in vitro Validation Study10.1115/1.4032995 ↗
19. Titanium vs. polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody fusion: Meta-analysis and review of the literature10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.062 ↗
20. Bioresorbable polymers: Heading for a new generation of spinal cages10.1007/s00586-005-1003-6 ↗
21. In vitro cytotoxicity of unsaturated oligo [poly (ethylene glycol) fumarate] macromers and their cross-linked hydrogels10.1021/bm020121m ↗
22. Data describing the swelling behavior and cytocompatibility of biodegradable polyelectrolyte hydrogels incorporating poly (L-lysine) for applications in cartilage tissue engineering10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.077 ↗
23. Design of nanocomposite injectable hydrogels for minimally invasive surgery10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00114 ↗
24. Gaihre, B., Liu, X., Lee Miller, A., Yaszemski, M., and Lu, L. (2020). Poly (Caprolactone Fumarate) and Oligo [Poly (Ethylene Glycol) Fumarate]: Two Decades of Exploration in Biomedical Applications. Polym. Rev., 1–38.10.1080/15583724.2020.1758718 ↗
25. Complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery10.1097/00006123-200211002-00001 ↗