A Deep Learning-Based Fragment Detection Approach for the Arena Fragmentation Test
Source abstract
Abstract
The arena fragmentation test (AFT) is one of the tests used to design an effective warhead. Conventionally, complex and expensive measuring equipment is used for testing a warhead and measuring important factors such as the size, velocity, and the spatial distribution of fragments where the fragments penetrate steel target plates. In this paper, instead of using specific sensors and equipment, we proposed the use of a deep learning-based object detection algorithm to detect fragments in the AFT. To this end, we acquired many high-speed videos and built an AFT image dataset with bounding boxes of warhead fragments. Our method fine-tuned an existing object detection network named the Faster R-convolutional neural network (CNN) on this dataset with modification of the network’s anchor boxes. We also employed a novel temporal filtering method, which was demonstrated as an effective non-fragment filtering scheme in our recent previous image processing-based fragment detection approach, to capture only the first penetrating fragments from all detected fragments. We showed that the performance of the proposed method was comparable to that of a sensor-based system under the same experimental conditions. We also demonstrated that the use of deep learning technologies in the task of AFT significantly enhanced the performance via a quantitative comparison between our proposed method and our recent previous image processing-based method. In other words, our proposed method outperformed the previous image processing-based method. The proposed method produced outstanding results in terms of finding the exact fragment positions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Korea
Department of Electrical Engineering, Hanbat National University, 125 Dongseo-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34158, Korea
The 5th Research and Development Institute, Agency for Defense Development, Daejeon 34186, Korea
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Zecevic, B., Terzic, J., Catovic, A., and Serdarević-Kadić, S. (2011, January 13–15). Characterization of distribution parameters of fragment mass and number for conventional projectiles. Proceedings of the 14th Seminar on New Trends in Research of Energetic Materials, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
2. Zecevic, B., Terzic, J., and Catovic, A. (2004, January 3–6). Influence of Warhead Design on Natural Fragmentation Performances. Proceedings of the 15th DAAAM International Symposium, Vienna, Austria.
3. Mott, N.F. (1947). Fragmentation of Shell Cases. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., 300–308.10.1098/rspa.1947.0042 ↗
4. Consideration of the Mass Distribution of Fragments by Natural Fragmentation in Combination with Preformed Fragments10.1002/prep.19760010106 ↗
5. Zecevic, B., Terzic, J., Catovic, A., and Serdarević-Kadić, S. (2006, January 19–21). Influencing Parameters on HE Projectiles With Natural Fragmentation. Proceedings of the 9th Seminar on New Trends in Research of Energetic Materials, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
6. Composite-Graph-Based Sparse Subspace Clustering for Machine Fault Diagnosis10.1109/TIM.2019.2923829 ↗
7. Improved Identification of Various Conditions of Induction Motor Bearing Faults10.1109/TIM.2019.2917981 ↗
8. A Novel Dynamic-Vision-Based Approach for Tactile Sensing Applications10.1109/TIM.2019.2919354 ↗
9. Sparse Force Mapping System Based on Compressive Sensing10.1109/TIM.2017.2658078 ↗
10. A Robust Pantograph–Catenary Interaction Condition Monitoring Method Based on Deep Convolutional Network10.1109/TIM.2019.2920721 ↗
11. Planar Motion Measurement of a Compliant Micro Stage: An Enhanced Microscopic Vision Approach10.1109/TIM.2019.2924066 ↗
12. Lee, K., Hwang, I., Kim, Y.-M., Lee, H., Kang, M., and Yu, J. (2020). Real-Time Weld Quality Prediction Using a Laser Vision Sensor in a Lap Fillet Joint during Gas Metal Arc Welding. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20061625 ↗
13. Kim, I.H., Bong, J.H., Park, J., and Park, S. (2017). Prediction of driver’s intention of lane change by augmenting sensor information using machine learning techniques. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17061350 ↗
14. Are all objects equal? Deep spatio-temporal importance prediction in driving videos10.1016/j.patcog.2016.08.029 ↗
15. Kang, B., and Lee, Y. (2020). High-Resolution Neural Network for Driver Visual Attention Prediction. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20072030 ↗
16. Berenguel-Baeta, B., Bermudez-Cameo, J., and Guerrero, J.J. (2020). OmniSCV: An Omnidirectional Synthetic Image Generator for Computer Vision. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20072066 ↗
17. Jomaa, R.M., Mathkour, H., Bazi, Y., and Islam, M.S. (2020). End-to-End Deep Learning Fusion of Fingerprint and Electrocardiogram Signals for Presentation Attack Detection. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20072085 ↗
18. Baillargeon, Y., and Lalanne, C. (2005). Methods to perform behind-armour debris analysis with x-ray films. DRDC Valcarier TM, Defence R&D Canada, Technical Memorandum.
19. Fragment velocity distribution of cylindrical rings under eccentric point initiation10.1002/prep.201400180 ↗
20. Optoelectronic System for Measuring Warhead Fragments Velocity10.1088/1742-6596/276/1/012136 ↗
21. Burke, J., Olson, E., and Shoemaker, G. (2016, January 10–12). Stereo Camera Optical Tracker. Proceedings of the ITEA Las Vegas Instrumentation Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
22. A New Image Processing-Based Fragment Detection Approach for Arena Fragmentation Test
23. Deep learning-based small object detection
24. Deep Learning based Object Detection and Distance Estimation using Mono Camera
25. Liu, W., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Szegedy, C., Reed, S., Fu, C.-Y., and Berg, A.C. (2016, January 11–14). SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.10.1007/978-3-319-46448-0_2 ↗
26. Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., and Farhadi, A. (2016, January 27–30). You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.91 ↗
27. Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2577031 ↗
28. Girshick, R. (2015, January 7–13). Fast R-CNN. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Santiago, Chile.10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 ↗
29. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., and Wojna, Z. (2016, January 27–30). Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.308 ↗
30. Lin, T.-Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., and Zitnick, C.L. (2014, January 6–12). Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Zurich, Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-319-10602-1_48 ↗