journal article·2020-05-15Open access

Finite Element Analysis of Traditional and New Fixation Techniques of the 3D-Printed Composite Interlocking Nail in Canine Femoral Shaft Fractures

Siwasit Pitjamit, Wasawat Nakkiew, Kriangkrai Thongkorn, Warinthorn Thanakulwattana, Kittiya Thunsiri

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 10

Abstract

Since the removal of a metallic interlocking nail system leaves a blank cavity inside a healed bone, bioactive and biodegradation materials have been used instead to induce bone formation and eliminate complications of the material removal procedure. The previous study presented the possibility of an interlocking nail fabrication from polylactic acid (PLA), polycaprolactone (PCL), and hydroxyapatite (HA) using 3D printing, namely fused filament fabrication (FFF), for canine diaphyseal fractures. Therefore, a finite element analysis (FEA) was used to predict the maximum principal stress of this 3D-printed composite interlocking nail to stabilize a canine femoral fracture, and the biomechanical performance was evaluated for the treatment of canine femoral shaft fractures using both traditional and new fixation techniques. Three-dimensional FEA models were created, and the composite interlocking nail was tested for implant strength and stability. Three types of canine femoral shaft fracture (proximal shaft fracture, middle shaft fracture, and distal shaft fracture) fixed by traditional and new fixation techniques, consisting of two, four, and six locking screws, were analyzed with a multilevel factorial design technique. The maximum principal stresses of the composite interlocking nail were compared with each fixation technique. According to the multilevel factorial design, gap type, fracture gap, and fixation techniques are factors that affect the maximum principal stress of the composite interlocking nail for two and four locking screws. For six locking screws, all factors, including gap type, fracture gap, nail length, and fixation techniques, significantly affect the maximum principal stress. The use of a 3D-printed composite interlocking nail system with new fixation techniques demonstrated lower maximum principal stresses than the interlocking nail system that used a traditional fixation technique. The results of this study could help orthopedic veterinary surgeons to understand the biomechanical performances of traditional and new fixation techniques. Furthermore, surgeons may use the numerical results of this analysis to choose a fixation technique based on a patient’s condition.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone fractures and treatments · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Orthopedic Infections and Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Ph.D.’s Degree Program in Industrial Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand

Center of Healthcare Engineering System, Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand

Department of Companion Animal and Wildlife Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand

Biomedical Engineering Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand

Funding

The Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University under the research assistant scholarship

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. Structural properties of interlocking nails, canine femora, and femur-interlocking nail constructs10.1111/j.1532-950X.1996.tb01432.x ↗
2. An in vitro biomechanical study of bone plate and interlocking nail in a canine diaphyseal femoral fracture model10.1053/jvet.2001.25863 ↗
3. Internal fracture fixation10.1053/j.ctsap.2004.09.002 ↗
4. Interlocking nails and minimally invasive osteosynthesis10.1016/j.cvsm.2019.09.003 ↗
5. Interlocking nails and minimally invasive osteosynthesis10.1016/j.cvsm.2012.07.004 ↗
6. Current concepts review-corrosion of metal orthopaedic implants10.2106/00004623-199802000-00015 ↗
7. Zhang, P., Wang, X., Lin, Z., Lin, H., Zhang, Z., Li, W., Yang, X., and Cui, J. (2017). Ti-based biomedical material modified with TiOx/TiNx duplex bioactivity film via Micro-Arc oxidation and nitrogen ion implantation. Nanomaterials, 7.10.3390/nano7100343 ↗
8. Intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures with self-reinforced polylactide implants10.1111/j.1748-5827.1993.tb02707.x ↗
9. Tissue reaction on PLLA versus stainless steel interlocking nails for fracture fixation: An animal study10.1016/0142-9612(95)98270-O ↗
10. Van der Elst, M., Dijkema, A., Klein, C., Patka, P., and Haarman, H.T.M. (1992). Biodegradable PLA Versus Stainless Steel Intramedullary Devices for Fracture Fixation. A Comperative Histological Study. Degradation Phenomena on Polymeric Biomaterials, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-77563-5_14 ↗
11. Bone tissue response to biodegradable polymers used for intra medullary fracture fixation: A long-term in vivo study in sheep femora10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00117-3 ↗
12. Biodegradable synthetic polymers for tissue engineering10.22203/eCM.v005a01 ↗
13. Characteristics of biodegradable implants
14. Preparation and characterization of PLA/PCL/HA composite scaffolds using indirect 3D printing for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.msec.2019.109960 ↗
15. Three-dimensional printed PCL-based implantable prototypes of medical devices for controlled drug delivery10.1016/j.xphs.2015.12.012 ↗
16. 3D printing assisted finite element analysis for optimising the manufacturing parameters of a lumbar fusion cage10.1016/j.matdes.2018.107540 ↗
17. Pitjamit, S., Thunsiri, K., Nakkiew, W., Wongwichai, T., Pothacharoen, P., and Wattanutchariya, W. (2020). The possibility of interlocking nail fabrication from FFF 3D printing PLA/PCL/HA composites coated by local silk fibroin for canine bone fracture treatment. Materials, 13.10.3390/ma13071564 ↗
18. 3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications10.1016/j.msec.2014.11.024 ↗
19. Tensile properties, tension–tension fatigue and biological response of polyetheretherketone–hydroxyapatite composites for load-bearing orthopedic implants10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00028-0 ↗
20. Internal fixation: Intramedullary pins, cerclage wires, and interlocking nails10.1016/S0195-5616(99)50104-6 ↗
21. In vitro biomechanical comparison of a plate-rod combination–construct and an interlocking nail–construct for experimentally induced gap fractures in canine tibiae10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1536 ↗
22. A case study of subsequential intramedullary nails failure10.1016/j.engfailanal.2008.06.015 ↗
23. A biomechanical investigation of the effects of static fixation and dynamization after interlocking femoral nailing: A finite element study10.1097/TA.0b013e3182244027 ↗
24. Three-dimensional finite element analysis and comparison of a new intramedullary fixation with interlocking intramedullary nail10.1007/s12013-014-0254-4 ↗
25. Biomechanical analyses of static and dynamic fixation techniques of retrograde interlocking femoral nailing using nonlinear finite element methods10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.11.002 ↗
26. Stress and strain distribution in the intact canine femur: Finite element analysis10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00002-X ↗
27. Bureau, M.N., Legoux, J.-G., and Denault, J. (2009). Implantable Biomimetic Prosthetic Bone. (US20090177282A1), Google Patents.
28. A porous polymeric–hydroxyapatite scaffold used for femur fractures treatment: Fabrication, analysis, and simulation10.1007/s00590-019-02530-3 ↗
29. (2020, April 04). Innovative Animal Products. Available online: http://www.innovativeanimal.com/pdf/June%202009%20FINAL.pdf.
30. A finite element model to simulate femoral fractures in calves: Testing different polymers for intramedullary interlocking nails10.1111/j.1532-950X.2012.01032.x ↗
31. (2020, May 06). Effects Plots for Analyze Factorial Design. Available online: https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/18/help-and-how-to/modeling-statistics/doe/how-to/factorial/analyze-factorial-design/interpret-the-results/all-statistics-and-graphs/effects-plots/.
32. Finite element analysis of a femoral retrograde intramedullary nail subject to gait loading10.1016/j.medengphy.2003.10.006 ↗
33. A biomechanical comparison of unlocked or locked reamed intramedullary nails in the treatment of mid-third simple transverse femoral shaft fractures
34. Biomechanical analysis of the mechanism of interlocking nail failure10.1007/BF00571522 ↗
35. Mechanical failure in intramedullary interlocking nails10.1177/230949900601400206 ↗
36. Implementation of boundary conditions in modeling the femur is critical for the evaluation of distal intramedullary nailing10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.08.007 ↗
37. Influence of intramedullary nail diameter and locking mode on the stability of tibial shaft fracture fixation10.1007/s00402-008-0700-0 ↗
38. Fixation stability of comminuted humeral shaft fractures: Locked intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation10.1097/00005373-200210000-00019 ↗
39. Validated finite element models of the proximal femur using two-dimensional projected geometry and bone density10.1016/j.cmpb.2010.11.008 ↗
40. Nonunion: General principles and experimental data10.1097/00003086-200402000-00003 ↗
41. Retrograde dynamic locked nailing for femoral supracondylar nonunions after plating10.1097/TA.0b013e3181492f2a ↗
42. Effect of dynamization in open interlocking nailing of femoral fractures. A prospective randomized comparative study of 50 cases with a 2-year follow-up
43. Healing of 56 segmental femoral shaft fractures after locked nailing: Poor results of dynamization10.3109/17453679708999022 ↗
44. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00040-9 ↗
45. Treatment for nonunion of the shaft of the humerus: Comparison of plates and Seidel interlocking nails
46. Fatigue fracture of the interlocking nail in the treatment of fractures of the distal part of the femoral shaft10.2106/00004623-198769090-00012 ↗
47. Treatment of femoral shaft fractures with a titanium intramedullary nail10.1097/00003086-200208000-00025 ↗
48. Physical, thermal, and mechanical properties of polymers
49. (2020, May 06). Factors Affecting the Tensile Strength of Materials. Available online: https://medium.com/@prestogroup/factors-affecting-the-tensile-strength-of-materials-bf1548f4e6bd.
50. (2020, May 06). Molar Volume and Density of Polymers. Available online: https://polymerdatabase.com/polymer%20physics/MolarVolume.html?fbclid=IwAR0VYGbdm5Av9G9hBttTGz0BM0_-yE9JGUkREG88ALIeAtbVp7b_PXRyfn4.
51. Design of biodegradable blends based on PLA and PCL: From morphological, thermal and mechanical studies to shape memory behavior10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.03.037 ↗
52. (2020, May 05). Orthopedic Follow-Up Evaluations: Identifying Complications. Available online: https://todaysveterinarypractice.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2016/06/T1409C09.pdf.
53. DeCamp, C.E. (2015). Brinker, Piermattei and Flo’s Handbook of Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair, Elsevier Health Sciences. [5th ed.].
54. Preparation of Poly (L-lactic acid)/Hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds by fused deposit modeling 3D printing10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.092 ↗
55. Patralekh, M.K., and Lal, H. (2020). 3D printing in orthopedic trauma. Precision Medicine for Investigators, Practitioners and Providers, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-819178-1.00047-2 ↗
56. Allen, B., Moore, C., Seyler, T., and Gall, K. (2020). Modulating antibiotic release from reservoirs in 3D-printed orthopedic devices to treat periprosthetic joint infection. J. Orthop. Res.10.1002/jor.24640 ↗
57. Ahirwar, H., Zhou, Y., Mahapatra, C., Ramakrishna, S., Kumar, P., and Nanda, H.S. (2020). Materials for orthopedic bioimplants: Modulating degradation and surface modification using integrated nanomaterials. Coatings, 10.10.3390/coatings10030264 ↗