Challenges for the Implantation of Symbiotic Nanostructured Medical Devices
Source abstract
Abstract
We discuss the perspectives of designing implantable medical devices that have the criterion of being symbiotic. Our starting point was whether the implanted device is intended to have any two-way (“duplex”) communication of energy or materials with the body. Such duplex communication extends the existing concepts of a biomaterial and biocompatibility to include the notion that it is important to consider the intended functional use of the implanted medical device. This demands a biomimetic approach to design functional symbiotic implantable medical devices that can be more efficient in mimicking what is happening at the molecular and cellular levels to create stable interfaces that allow for the unfettered exchanges of molecules between an implanted device and a body. Such a duplex level of communication is considered to be a necessary characteristic of symbiotic implanted medical devices that are designed to function for long periods of time inside the body to restore and assist the function of the body. We illustrate these perspectives with experience gained from implanting functional enzymatic biofuel cells.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG/SyNaBi (UMR 5525), 38000 Grenoble, France
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche · Investissements d'Avenir
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Zsigmondy, R.A. (1966). Properties of Colloids. Nobel Lectures, Chemistry 1922–1941, Elsevier.
2. Schmitt, O.H. (September, January 29). Some interesting and useful biomimetic transforms. Proceedings of the 3rd Inter Biophysics Congress, Boston, MA, USA.
3. There’s plenty of room at the bottom
4. Tackling the concept of symbiotic implantable medical devices with nanobiotechnologies10.1002/biot.201800102 ↗
5. Utilization of enzyme cascades for complete oxidation of lactate in an enzymatic biofuel cell10.1016/j.electacta.2011.01.050 ↗
6. Tackling the challenges of enzymatic (bio)fuel cells10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00115 ↗
7. Challenges for successful implantation of biofuel cells10.1016/j.bioelechem.2018.05.011 ↗
8. Polymers for the sustained release of proteins and other macromolecules10.1038/263797a0 ↗
9. Biocompatibility of polymeric delivery systems for macromolecules10.1002/jbm.820150212 ↗
10. Cell adhesion to polymeric materials: Implications with respect to biocompatibility10.1002/jbm.820090505 ↗
11. Radiation-grafted hydrogels for biomaterial applications as studied by the ESCA technique10.1002/app.1978.070220306 ↗
12. Biomaterials and biocompatibility
13. Biopolymers as biomaterials: Mechanical properties of gamma-benzyl-L-glutamate-L-leucine copolymers10.1002/jbm.820060405 ↗
14. The potential for poly-α-amino acids as biomaterials10.1002/jbm.820080320 ↗
15. Biocompatibility pathways: Biomaterials-induced sterile inflammation, mechanotransduction, and principles of biocompatibility control10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00607 ↗
16. Phase changes in biomaterials10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.08.030 ↗
17. Biomaterials: Been there, done that, and evolving into the future10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-120940 ↗
18. Proteomic analysis of silica hybrid sol-gel coatings: A potential tool for predicting the biocompatibility of implants in vivo10.1080/08927014.2017.1356289 ↗
19. Porous implants modulate healing and induce shifts in local macrophage polarization in the Foreign Body Reaction10.1007/s10439-013-0933-0 ↗
20. Stem cell therapies for treating diabetes: Progress and remaining challenges10.1016/j.stem.2018.05.016 ↗
21. Anti-biofouling sulfobetaine polymer thin films on silicon and silicon nanopore membranes10.1163/092050609X12578498982998 ↗
22. Biocompatibility of MPC: In vivo evaluation for clinical application10.1007/BF02479925 ↗
23. Cell-membrane-inspired silicone interfaces that mitigate proinflammatory macrophage activation and bacterial adhesion10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b02292 ↗
24. Biocompatibility assessment of porous chitosan-Nafion and chitosan-PTFE composites in vivo10.1002/jbm.a.34830 ↗
25. Bioelectrodes modified with chitosan for long-term energy supply from the body10.1039/C4EE03430A ↗
26. Remote wireless control of an enzymatic biofuel cell implanted in a rabbit for 2 months10.1016/j.electacta.2018.02.156 ↗
27. Chitosan improves stability of carbon nanotube biocathodes for glucose biofuel cells10.1039/C4CC04862H ↗
28. Cinquin, P., Gondran, C., Giroud, F., Mazabrard, S., Pellissier, A., Boucher, F., Alcaraz, J., Gorgy, K., Lenouvel, F., and Mathe, S. (2010). A glucose biofuel cell implanted in rats. PLoS ONE, 5.10.1371/journal.pone.0010476 ↗
29. Single glucose biofuel cells implanted in rats power electronic devices10.1038/srep01516 ↗
30. Design of biomimetic and bioactive cold plasma-modified nanostructured scaffolds for enhanced osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0235 ↗
31. In vitro assessment of three dimensional dense chitosan-based structures to be used as bioabsorbable implants10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.09.014 ↗
32. Alcaraz, J.P. (2016). Conception Guidée par la Physiologie de Biopiles Bioinspirées Implantables. [Ph.D. Thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes].
33. Top-down strategy of implantable biosensor using adaptable, porous hollow fibrous membrane10.1021/acssensors.9b00035 ↗
34. Biocompatibility of subcutaneously implanted marine macromolecules cross-linked bio-composite scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering applications10.1080/09205063.2017.1413759 ↗
35. Alkyl chitosan film-high strength, functional biomaterials10.1002/jbm.a.36163 ↗
36. A novel cross-linked poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) for vascular grafts10.1002/adfm.200701261 ↗
37. Evaluation of hemocompatibility and endothelialization of hybrid poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)/gelatin polymer films10.1002/jbm.b.32977 ↗
38. Penven, G. (2016). Encapsulation de Dispositifs Symbiotiques Implantables: Évaluation de la Biocompatibilité et des Performances. [Ph.D. Thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes].
39. Long-term in vivo performance and biocompatibility of poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogel macrocapsules for hybrid-type artificial pancreas10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00076-2 ↗
40. Shah, R., Stodulka, P., Skopalova, K., and Saha, P. (2019). Dual crosslinked collagen/chitosan film for potential biomedical applications. Polymers, 11.10.3390/polym11122094 ↗
41. Biomimetic modification of poly (vinyl alcohol): Encouraging endothelialization and preventing thrombosis with antiplatelet monotherapy10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.008 ↗
42. Dolega, M.E., Wagh, J., Gerbaud, S., Kermarrec, F., Alcaraz, J.P., Martin, D.K., Gidrol, X., and Picollet-d’hahan, N. (2014). Facile bench-top fabrication of enclosed circular microchannels provides 3D confined structure for growth of prostate epithelial cells. PLoS ONE, 9.10.1371/journal.pone.0099416 ↗
43. The modulation of attachment, growth and morphology of cancerous prostate cells by polyelectrolyte nanofilms10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.093 ↗
44. Long duration stabilization of porous silicon membranes in physiological media: Application for implantable reactors10.1016/j.msec.2019.110359 ↗