Show source-provided references
1. Hard and soft tissue changes following alveolar ridge preservation: A systematic review
10.1111/clr.12911 ↗4. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
10.1111/jcpe.13057 ↗6. Immediate and conventional single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: 1-year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01687.x ↗7. Predictors of inter-proximal and midfacial recession following single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: A multivariate analysis
10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01921.x ↗8. Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single-tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: A cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetic scores
10.1902/jop.2009.080435 ↗9. Osteology Consensus Group 2011. Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets
10. Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: Comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial
10.1902/jop.2013.120711 ↗11. Alveolar Ridge Preservation after Tooth Extraction Using Different Bone Graft Materials and Autologous Platelet Concentrates: A Systematic Review
10.5037/jomr.2019.10102 ↗12. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration
14. Alveolar ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss: A histologic study in humans
15. Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: A clinical and histomorphometric study
10.1902/jop.2008.070628 ↗16. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: A randomized, controlled clinical trial
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01918.x ↗17. Comparison of an allograft in an experimental putty carrier and a bovine-derived xenograft used in ridge preservation: A clinical and histologic study in humans
18. HA/TCP compounding of a porous CaP biomaterial improves bone formation and scaffold degradation.A long termhistological study
10.1002/jbm.b.30199 ↗19. Ridge Preservation Using Composite Alloplastic Materials: A Randomized Control Clinical and Histological Study in Humans
10.1111/cid.12415 ↗20. Minimally Invasive Alveolar Ridge Preservation Utilizing an In Situ Hardening β-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Substitute: A Multicenter Case Series
10.1155/2016/5406736 ↗21. Ridge preservation using an in situ hardening biphasic calcium phosphate (β-TCP/HA) bone graft substitute-a clinical, radiological, and histological study
10.1186/s40729-017-0086-2 ↗23. A Human Clinical, Histological, Histomorphometrical, and Radiographical Study on Biphasic HA-Beta-TCP 30/70 in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
10.1111/cid.12145 ↗24. Effect of Substrate Topography and Chemistry on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Markers: A Transcriptome Study
10.15283/ijsc18102 ↗25. Cells responding to surface structure of calcium phosphate ceramics for bone regeneration
10.1002/term.2236 ↗27. Impact of biomaterial microtopography on bone regeneration: Comparison of three hydroxyapatites
10.1111/clr.12986 ↗28. A prospective, randomized controlled preclinical trial to evaluate different formulations of biphasic calcium phosphate in combination with a hydroxyapatite collagen membrane to reconstruct deficient alveolar ridges
10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00185 ↗30. Histomorphometric comparison of a biphasic bone ceramic to anorganic bovine bone for sinus augmentation: 6- to 8-month postsurgical assessment of vital bone formation. A pilot study