Influence of Multiple Openings on Reinforced Concrete Outrigger Walls in a Tall Building
Source abstract
Abstract
Outrigger systems have been used to control the lateral displacement of tall buildings. Reinforced concrete (R.C.) outrigger walls with openings can be used to replace conventional steel outrigger trusses. In this paper, a structural model for an R.C. outrigger wall with multiple openings was proposed, and the effects of the multiple openings on the stiffness and strength of the outrigger walls were evaluated. The equivalent bending stiffness of the outrigger wall was derived to predict the lateral displacement at the top of tall buildings and internal shear force developed in the wall. The openings for the passageway in the wall were designed by the strut-and-tie model. The stiffness and strength of the outrigger wall with multiple openings was analyzed by the nonlinear finite element analysis. Taking into consideration the degradation in stiffness and strength, the ratio of the opening area to the outrigger wall area is recommended to be less than 20%. The degradation of stiffness due to openings does not affect the structural performance of the outrigger system when the outrigger has already large stiffness as the case of reinforced concrete outrigger walls.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Architecture, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea
Funding
Konkuk University
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Outrigger system design considerations
2. Structural developments in tall buildings: Current trends and future prospects10.3763/asre.2007.5027 ↗
3. Optimum belt truss location for high-rise structures
4. Drift reduction factors for belt high-rise structures10.62913/engj.v12i3.247 ↗
5. Smith, B.S., and Nwaka, I.O. (1980). The behaviour of multi-outrigger braced tall buildings. ACI SP-63, 515–541.
6. Parameter study of outrigger-braced tall building structures10.1061/JSDEAG.0005798 ↗
7. Analysis of high-rise braced frames with outriggers10.1002/tal.226 ↗
8. Structural performance of multi-outrigger-braced tall buildings10.1002/tal.219 ↗
9. Multi-objective optimization of dual-purpose outriggers in tall buildings to reduce lateral displacement and differential axial shortening10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.098 ↗
10. Multi-dimensional hybrid design and construction of skyscraper cluster-innovative engineering of Raffles City10.21022/IJHRB.2017.6.3.261 ↗
11. The evolution of outrigger system in tall buildings10.21022/IJHRB.2016.5.1.21 ↗
12. Structural idealization for deep beams with web openings10.1680/macr.1977.29.99.81 ↗
13. Consistent strut-and-tie modeling of deep beams with web openings10.1680/macr.2003.55.1.65 ↗
14. Interactive mechanical model for shear strength of deep beams10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:10(1534) ↗
15. Smith, B.S., and Coull, A. (1991). Tall Building Structures: Analysis and Design, John Wiley & Sons.
16. ACI Committee 318 (2014). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (318R-14), American Concrete Institute.
17. (2019, September 10). Available online: http://manual.midasuser.com/EN_Common/Gen/855/whnjs.htm.
18. Towards a consistent design of structural concrete10.15554/pcij.05011987.74.150 ↗
19. Design and detailing of structural concrete using strut-and-tie models
20. Abaqus (2019, September 10). Available online: http://130.149.89.49:2080/v2016/books/usb/default.htm,.
21. Application of damage-plasticity models in finite element analysis of punching shear10.1016/j.compstruc.2015.01.008 ↗
22. Tao, Y., and Chen, J.F. (2015). Concrete damage plasticity model for modeling FRP-to-concrete bond behavior. J. Compos. Const., 19.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000482 ↗
23. Nonlinear finite-element analysis for the behavior prediction and strut efficiency factor of GFRP-reinforced concrete deep beams10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.045 ↗
24. Finite element analysis of punching shear of concrete slabs using damaged plasticity model in ABAQUS10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.04.016 ↗
25. Ombres, L., and Verre, S. (2019). Flexural strengthening of RC beams with steel-reinforced grout: Experimental and numerical investigation. J. Compos. Const., 23.10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000960 ↗
26. Survey and seismic vulnerability assessment of the Baptistery of San Giovanni in Tumba (Italy)10.1016/j.culher.2017.01.010 ↗
27. Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892) ↗
28. Stress-strain relationship for plain concrete in compression
29. Wahalathantri, B.L., Thambiratnam, D.P., Chan, T.H.T., and Fawzia, S. (2011, January 28). A material model for flexural crack simulation in reinforced concrete elements using Abaqus. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Engineering, Designing and Developing the Built Environment for Sustainable Wellbeing, Brisbane, Australia.
30. Finite element analysis to determine shear behavior of prestressed concrete deep beams10.7734/COSEIK.2019.32.3.165 ↗
31. Optimum design of outriggers in a tall building by alternating nonlinear programming10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.043 ↗