Mixed-Degree Cubature H∞ Information Filter-Based Visual-Inertial Odometry
Source abstract
Abstract
Visual–inertial odometry is an effective system for mobile robot navigation. This article presents an egomotion estimation method for a dual-sensor system consisting of a camera and an inertial measurement unit (IMU) based on the cubature information filter and H∞ filter. The intensity of the image was used as the measurement directly. The measurements from the two sensors were fused with a hybrid information filter in a tightly coupled way. The hybrid filter used the third-degree spherical-radial cubature rule in the time-update phase and the fifth-degree spherical simplex-radial cubature rule in the measurement-update phase for numerical stability. The robust H∞ filter was combined into the measurement-update phase of the cubature information filter framework for robustness toward non-Gaussian noises in the intensity measurements. The algorithm was evaluated on a common public dataset and compared to other visual navigation systems in terms of absolute and relative accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization · Advanced Vision and Imaging · Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Visual odometry part i: The first 30 years and fundamentals10.1109/MRA.2011.943233 ↗
2. Review of visual odometry: Types, approaches, challenges, and applications10.1186/s40064-016-3573-7 ↗
3. Papoutsidakis, M., Kalovrektis, K., Drosos, C., and Stamoulis, G. (2017). Intelligent design and algorithms to control a stereoscopic camera on a robotic workspace. Int. J. Comput. Appl., 167.10.5120/ijca2017914495 ↗
4. Optical 3D laser measurement system for navigation of autonomous mobile robot10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.08.005 ↗
5. Optimization of 3D laser scanning speed by use of combined variable step10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.08.011 ↗
6. Lindner, L., Sergiyenko, O., Rivas-Lopez, M., Ivanov, M., Rodriguez-Quinonez, J.C., Hernandez-Balbuena, D., Flores-Fuentes, W., Tyrsa, V., Muerrieta-Rico, F.N., and Mercorelli, P. (2017, January 19–21). Machine vision system errors for unmanned aerial vehicle navigation. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics, Edinburgh, UK.10.1109/ISIE.2017.8001488 ↗
7. Visual odometry part ii: Matching, robustness, optimization, and applications10.1109/MRA.2012.2182810 ↗
8. Guang, X.X., Gao, Y.B., Leung, H., Liu, P., and Li, G.C. (2018). An autonomous vehicle navigation system based on inertial and visual sensors. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18092952 ↗
9. Mostafa, M., Zahran, S., Moussa, A., El-Sheimy, N., and Sesay, A. (2018). Radar and visual odometry integrated system aided navigation for UAVS in GNSS denied environment. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18092776 ↗
10. Vins-mono: A robust and versatile monocular visual-inertial state estimator10.1109/TRO.2018.2853729 ↗
11. Autonomous aerial navigation using monocular visual-inertial fusion10.1002/rob.21732 ↗
12. Aladem, M., and Rawashdeh, S.A. (2018). Lightweight visual odometry for autonomous mobile robots. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18092837 ↗
13. Bloesch, M., Omani, S., Hutter, M., and Siegwart, R. (October, January 28). Robust visual inertial odometry using a direct EKF-based approach. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Hamburg, Germany.10.1109/IROS.2015.7353389 ↗
14. Build your own visual-inertial drone a cost-effective and open-source autonomous drone10.1109/MRA.2017.2771326 ↗
15. Okamura, A., Menciassi, A., Ude, A., Burschka, D., Lee, D., Arrichiello, F., Liu, H., Moon, H., Neira, J., and Sycara, K. (2016, January 16–21). Direct visual-inertial odometry with stereo cameras. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Stockholm, Sweden.
16. Direct sparse odometry10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2658577 ↗
17. Cubature kalman filters10.1109/TAC.2009.2019800 ↗
18. High-degree cubature kalman filter10.1016/j.automatica.2012.11.014 ↗
19. Spherical simplex-radial cubature kalman filter10.1109/LSP.2013.2290381 ↗
20. Interpolatory cubature kalman filters10.1049/iet-cta.2014.0873 ↗
21. Robust measure of non-linearity-based cubature kalman filter10.1049/iet-smt.2017.0108 ↗
22. Multi-rate cubature kalman filter based data fusion method with residual compensation to adapt to sampling rate discrepancy in attitude measurement system10.1063/1.4997072 ↗
23. Robust huber-based cubature kalman filter for gps navigation processing10.1017/S0373463316000692 ↗
24. Pham, K.D., Cox, J.L., Howard, R.T., and Chen, G. (2013). Multiple sensor estimation using a high-degree cubature information filter. Sensors and Systems for Space Applications VI, Spie-Int Soc Optical Engineering.
25. Multiple sensor estimation using a new fifth-degree cubature information filter10.1177/0142331214523032 ↗
26. Two-stage high-degree cubature information filter10.3233/JIFS-169331 ↗
27. Jiang, H., and Cai, Y. (2018). Adaptive fifth-degree cubature information filter for multi-sensor bearings-only tracking. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18103241 ↗
28. Robust high-degree cubature information filter and its application to trajectory estimation for ballistic missile10.1177/0954410017713771 ↗
29. Mobile robot localization using robust extended h-infinity filtering
30. A cubature h-infinity filter and its square-root version10.1080/00207179.2013.856520 ↗
31. Cubature h-infinity information filter and its extensions10.1016/j.ejcon.2016.02.001 ↗
32. An efficient orientation filter for inertial and inertial/magnetic sensor arrays
33. A numerical-integration perspective on gaussian filters10.1109/TSP.2006.875389 ↗
34. Simon, D. (2006). Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity, and Nonlinear Approaches, Wiley.10.1002/0470045345 ↗
35. Performance evaluation of ukf-based nonlinear filtering10.1016/j.automatica.2005.10.004 ↗
36. Author’s reply to “comments on ‘performance evaluation of ukf-based nonlinear filtering’”10.1016/j.automatica.2006.10.002 ↗
37. Sturm, J., Engelhard, N., Endres, F., Burgard, W., and Cremers, D. (2012, January 7–12). A benchmark for the evaluation of RGB-D slam systems. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vilamoura, Portugal.10.1109/IROS.2012.6385773 ↗
38. 3-D mapping with an RGB-D camera10.1109/TRO.2013.2279412 ↗