New Approaches for Supervision of Systems with Sliding Wear: Fundamental Problems and Experimental Results Using Different Approaches
Source abstract
Abstract
Reliability and availability of technically complex and safety-critical systems are of increasing importance. Besides the degree of wear, the quality of mechanical systems is significant for the system reliability. The focus of this contribution is the development and application of readily applicable and easily interpretable algorithms for industrial data obtained from technical systems during operation. The methods are within the focus of the production-oriented automation programs (Industrial Internet, Automation 4.0, China 2025). In this contribution as example a hydraulically driven machine in which parts slide over each other is chosen as sliding wear example. Monitoring is applied to distinguish normal and abnormal operation as well as to define end of useful lifetime. In this contribution four different methods will be introduced and experimentally compared without the availability of objective information about the wear state. The approaches differ with respect to the used measurements and data preparation. As measurements Acoustic Emission and the hydraulic pressure of the driving machine are used. For processing the accumulation of damage related values, a machine learning algorithm, and a sensitivity matrix are used. For comparison the experimental validation is based on identical data sets. Different operational states of the system denoted as actual system state are defined and classified. The comparison shows that the four introduced methods provide similar classification results although the underlying measurements are based on different physical principles. The newly introduced approaches allow online evaluation of the actual system state and can serve within improved maintenance strategies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chair of Dynamics and Control, University of Duisburg-Essen, Lotharstrasse 65, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. An introduction to structural health monitoring10.1007/978-3-7091-0399-9_1 ↗
2. Drill wear identification under varying cutting conditions using vibration and cutting force signals and data mining techniques10.1016/j.procs.2014.09.054 ↗
3. Intelligent condition monitoring of a gearbox using artificial neural network10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.08.005 ↗
4. Classification of wear level of mining tools with the use of fuzzy neural network10.1016/j.tust.2012.12.002 ↗
5. Tool wear condition monitoring using a sensor fusion model based on fuzzy inference system10.1016/j.ymssp.2008.02.010 ↗
6. Katalinic, B. (2013, January 20–27). Tool wear classification using decision treesin stone drilling applications: A preliminary study. Proceedings of the 24th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation, Zadar, Croatia.
7. Advanced monitoring of machining operations10.1016/j.cirp.2010.05.010 ↗
8. Support vector machine based data processing algorithm for wear degree classification of slurry pump systems10.1016/j.measurement.2010.02.014 ↗
9. Prognostics of slurry pumps based on a moving-average wear degradation index and a general sequential Monte Carlo method10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.10.010 ↗
10. Yang, F., Shah, S.L., and Xiao, D. (July, January 30). Correlation analysis of alarm data and alarm limit design for industrial processes. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA.
11. Remaining lifetime modeling using State-of-Health estimation10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.01.031 ↗
12. Tool condition monitoring using K-star algorithm10.1016/j.eswa.2013.11.005 ↗
13. Multisensor information integration for online wear condition monitoring of diesel engines10.1016/j.triboint.2014.09.020 ↗
14. Chang, F.K. (2013, January 10–12). Smart, tough, and successful: Three new innovative approaches for diagnosis and prognosis of technical systems. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA, USA.
15. Le Cam, V., Mevel, L., and Schoefs, F. (2014, January 8–11). Wear-oriented state-of-health calculation and classification using operating data. Proceedings of the 7th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Nantes, France.
16. Chang, F.K. (2015, January 1–3). Development of a state-related evaluation for diagnostic-oriented data filtering approach. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA, USA.
17. Stachowiak, G.W. (2014). Classification of wear mechanism/models. Wear: Materials, Mechanisms and Practice, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
18. Comparison between methods for measuring wear in brake friction materials10.1016/j.wear.2014.08.004 ↗
19. Condition monitoring and classification of rotating machinery using wavelets and hidden Markov models10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.01.009 ↗
20. Intelligent diagnosis and prognosis of tool wear using dominant feature identification10.1109/TII.2009.2023318 ↗
21. Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.12.007 ↗
22. Modeling of probability distribution functions for automatic threshold calculation in condition monitoring systems10.1016/j.measurement.2012.09.011 ↗
23. Naghoosi, E., Izadi, I., and Chen, T. (July, January 29). A study on the relation between alarm deadbands and optimal alarm limits. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA.
24. Bechhoefer, E., He, D., and Dempsey, P. (2011, January 25–29). Gear health threshold setting based on probability of false alarm. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society, Montreal, QC, Canada.10.36001/phmconf.2011.v3i1.2059 ↗
25. (1990). Standard Terminology for Nondestructive Examinations, American Society for Testing and Materials. E 1316-90.
26. Jin, Z., Gong, B., Jin, W., and Wen, B. (2008, January 21–22). Analysis of acoustic emission signals from stainless steel with different wavelet bases. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Knowledge Acquisition and Modeling, Wuhan, China.10.1109/KAMW.2008.4810635 ↗
27. Kalyanasundaram, P., Raj, B., and Jayakuma, T. (2005, January 2–4). Characterization of microstructures in metallic materials using static and dynamic acoustic signal processing techniques. Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Advances in Signal Processing for Non Destructive Evaluation of Materials, Québec City, QC, Canada.
28. Wear detection by means of wavelet-based Acoustic Emission analysis10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.02.012 ↗
29. Stachowiak, G.W., Batchelor, A.W., and Stachowiak, G.B. (2004). Experimental Methods in Tribology, Elsevier.
30. Neale, M.J., and Gee, M.G. (2001). Guide to Wear Problems and Testing for Industry, William Andrew Pub.10.1016/B978-081551471-8.50002-5 ↗
31. Chang, F.K., and Kopsaftopoulos, F. (2015, January 1–3). Improvement and comparison of wear-oriented state-of- health classification methods using optimization techniques. Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Stanford, CA, USA.
32. Abe, S. (2010). Support Vector Machines for Pattern Classification, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84996-098-4 ↗
33. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., and Stork, D.G. (2001). Pattern Classification, Wiley Interscience.
34. Murty, M.N., and Devi, V.S. (2011). Pattern Recognition, an Algorithmic Approach, Springer-Verlag London & Press Pvt. Ltd.10.1007/978-0-85729-495-1 ↗