Geometric Error Parameterization of a CMM via Calibrated Hole Plate Archived Utilizing DCC Formatting
Source abstract
Abstract
This study implemented the measurement results and administrative information obtained from the hole plate into the Digital Calibration Certificate (DCC). The DCC comprises three parts: Norms and Standards, Hierarchical Structure, and XML as Exchange Format. DCCs play a significant role in the field of metrology and statistics by ensuring data interoperability, correctness, and traceability during the conversion and transmission process. The hole plate is a length standard used for two-dimensional geometric error measurements. We evaluated the accuracy of the high-precision coordinate measuring machine (CMM) in measuring a hole plate and compared the measurement error results obtained from the hole plate with those of the laser interferometer, autocollimator, and angle square. The results show that the maximum difference in linear error is −0.30 μm, the maximum difference in angle error is −0.78″, and the maximum difference in squareness error is 4.54″. The XML is designed for machine-readability and is modeled and edited using the XMLSpy 2022 software, which is based on information published by PTB. The administrative management and measurement results tasks are presented in PDF format, which is designed for human-readability and ease of use. Overall, we implemented the measurement results and information obtained from the hole plate into the DCC.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Precision Mechanical Metrology Research Laboratory, Center for Measurement Standards, Industrial Technology Research Institute, 321, Sec. 2, Kuang Fu Rd., Hsinchu 30011, Taiwan
Funding
Industrial Technology Research Institute · Bureau of Standards Metrology and Inspection and the Industrial Technology Research Institute in the Republic of China
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Singh, R. (2006). Introduction to Basic Manufacturing Processes and Workshop Technology, New Age International.
2. Besterfield, D.H. (2004). Quality Control, Pearson Education.
3. Ensuring the validity of results by intermediate checks in the field of mass measurements
4. Evaluation of the performance of coordinate measuring machines in the industry, using calibrated artefacts10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.232 ↗
5. Hoang, X.L., Fay, A., Marks, P., and Weyrich, M. (2016, January 6–9). Systematization approach for the adaptation of manufacturing machines. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 21st International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Berlin, Germany.
6. Stalmachova, K., Chinoracky, R., and Strenitzerova, M. (2022). Changes in business models caused by digital transformation and the COVID-19 pandemic and possibilities of their measurement—Case study. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14010127 ↗
7. COVID-19 Pandemic: Shifting Digital Transformation to a High-Speed Gear10.1080/10580530.2020.1814461 ↗
8. Digital transformation of everyday life—How COVID-19 pandemic transformed the basic education of the young generation and why information management research should care?10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102183 ↗
9. The Digital Calibration Certificate
10. Brown, C., Elo, T., Hovhannisyan, K., Hutzschenreuter, D., Kuosmanen, P., Maennel, O., Mustapaa, T., Nikander, P., and Wiedenhoefer, T. (2020, January 3–5). Infrastructure for Digital Calibration Certificates. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT, Rome, Italy.10.1109/MetroInd4.0IoT48571.2020.9138220 ↗
11. Brief overview of the future of metrology10.1016/j.measen.2021.100306 ↗
12. Interoperability: Linking Design and Tolerancing with Metrology10.1016/j.procir.2016.04.106 ↗
13. Campbell, D., Brown, C., Brown, R., Herron, J., Admire, R., Horst, J., Leland, C., and Stahl, R. (2019). Why QIF Matters—A Roadmap for Digital Manufacturing. Model-Based Enterp. Summit, 58–63.
14. Quality information framework–integrating metrology processes10.3182/20120523-3-RO-2023.00113 ↗
15. Mustapää, T., Nummiluikki, J., and Viitala, R. (2022). Digitalization of Calibration Data Management in Pharmaceutical Industry Using a Multitenant Platform. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12157531 ↗
16. Marques, M., Sousa, J.A., and Ribeiro, L. (2019, January 24–26). Calibration 4.0–Information system for usage of digital calibration certificates. Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Metrology (CIM2019), Paris, France.10.1051/metrology/201901002 ↗
17. PDF/A-3 solution for digital calibration certificates10.1016/j.measen.2021.100282 ↗
18. Impact of Industry 4.0/ICTs, Lean Six Sigma and quality management systems on organisational performance10.1108/TQM-10-2019-0251 ↗
19. Analyzing Industry 4.0 Implementation Barriers in Indian SMEs10.1142/S2424862221500020 ↗
20. Communication and Validation of Metrological Smart Data in IoT-Networks
21. The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises10.1016/j.bushor.2015.03.008 ↗
22. Towards a new generation of digital calibration certificate: Analysis and survey10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109611 ↗
23. Petrillo, A., Cioffi, R., and Felice, F.D. (2018). Digital Transformation in Smart Manufacturing, IntechOpen.10.5772/intechopen.69336 ↗
24. Mustapää, T., Nikander, P., Hutzschenreuter, D., and Viitala, R. (2020). Metrological challenges in collaborative sensing: Applicability of digital calibration certificates. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20174730 ↗
25. Challenges in sensors technology for industry 4.0 for futuristic metrological applications10.1007/s12647-021-00453-1 ↗
26. The fundamental architecture of the DCC10.1016/j.measen.2021.100354 ↗
27. A demonstrator for measurement workflows using digital calibration certificates (DCCs)10.1016/j.measen.2021.100208 ↗
28. A visual tool for generating digital calibration certificates (DCCs) in Excel10.1016/j.measen.2021.100175 ↗
29. (2012). Test Code for Machine Tools—Part 1: Geometric Accuracy of Machines Operating under No-Load or Quasi-Static Conditions (Standard No. ISO 230-1:2012).
30. (2015). Test Code for Machine Tools—Part 7: Geometric Accuracy of Axes of Rotation (Standard No. ISO 230-7: 2015).
31. A reference object based method to determine the parametric error components of coordinate measuring machines and machine tools10.1016/0263-2241(91)90022-I ↗
32. A hole-plate artifact design for the volumetric error calibration of CMM10.1007/s001700170151 ↗
33. Sładek, J.A. (2016). Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering, Springer.
34. Final report on APMP regional key comparison APMP. L-K6: Calibration of ball plate and hole plate10.1088/0026-1394/51/1A/04003 ↗
35. Comparative evaluation of estimation of hole plate measurement uncertainty via Monte Carlo simulation10.1016/j.precisioneng.2019.02.007 ↗
36. Kim, Y.H., Han, S.-S., Choi, Y.J., and Woo, C.-W. (2020). Linear Accuracy of Full-Arch Digital Models Using Four Different Scanning Methods: An In Vitro Study Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10082741 ↗
37. Kritikos, M., Maure, L.C., Céspedes, A.A.L., Sobrino, D.R.D., and Hrušecký, R. (2020). A Random Factorial Design of Experiments Study on the Influence of Key Factors and Their Interactions on the Measurement Uncertainty: A Case Study Using the ZEISS CenterMax. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10010037 ↗
38. Riska, K. (2022). Digital Calibration Certificate as Part of an Ecosystem. [Master’s Thesis, Novia University of Applied Sciences].
39. (2023, March 07). Schema Documentation for dcc.xsd. Available online: https://www.ptb.de/dcc/v3.2.0/autogenerated-docs/Doku%20Oxygen%203.2.0.html.
40. (2017). Identification of Units of Measurements for Computer-Based Processing (Standard No. IEC TS 62720).
41. Gapinski, B., Grzelka, M., and Rucki, M. (2006, January 17−22). The accuracy analysis of the roundness measurement with coordinate measuring machines. Proceedings of the XVIII Imeko World Congress, Metrology for a Suistainable Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
42. Fitting circles and spheres to coordinate measuring machine data10.1023/A:1007996916604 ↗
43. (2014). Test Code for Machine Tools—Part 2: Determination of Accuracy and Repeatability of Positioning Numerically Controlled Axes (Standard No. ISO 230-2: 2014).
44. Lee, H.-W., Chen, J.-R., Pan, S.-P., Liou, H.-C., and Hsu, P.E. (2016). Relationship between ISO 230-2/-6 Test Results and Positioning Accuracy of Machine Tools Using Lasertracer. Appl. Sci., 6.10.3390/app6040105 ↗
45. (2002). Test Code for Machine Tools—Part 6: Determination of Positioning Accuracy on Body and Face Diagonals (Diagonal Displacement Tests) (Standard No. ISO 230-6).
46. (2009). Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Acceptance and Reverification Tests for Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM)—Part 2: CMMs Used for Measuring Linear Dimensions (Standard No. ISO 10360-2).
47. (2008). Uncertainty of Measurement–Part 3: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (Standard No. ISO/IEC Guide 98-3: 2008).