journal article·2022-11-14Open access

Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Compacted Clay–Sand Layers

Muawia Dafalla, Abdullah Shaker, Mosleh Al-Shamrani

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 22

Abstract

The ASTM D6951 suggests a test method using the dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) for the assessment of shallow pavement strength. This study is dedicated to evaluating a similar test method to be used for fine-grained clay–sand mixtures, which are commonly used to construct liners and fluid barriers. The liner layers include clay, which is water-sensitive. The shear strength of the liners depends mainly on the composition and proportions of the mixtures adopted. A series of tests were conducted in the laboratory for compacted clay–sand mixtures, including 5% and 10% bentonite material. The responses to advancing a dynamic probe into compacted material at three various moisture conditions—namely, the optimum, dry of optimum, and wet of optimum water contents—are investigated. The penetration profiles are compared for the two clay content levels selected and for three moisture state conditions. The clay–sand liners support vehicles and vibratory compactors during construction and when waste material is placed. The shear strengths of the mixtures are evaluated in the laboratory using direct shear tests. From the results obtained in this investigation, general guidelines and recommendations are presented to help with the efficient assessment of liners consisting of clay–sand mixtures. A cheap and quick approach to assess the density and shear strength of landfill liners or clay–sand layers can be achieved using a hand-held dynamic cone penetrometer. The state of moisture during compaction was found to influence the DCP results. The compaction of layers in a wet of optimum state is not expected to be an ideal alternative.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Bugshan Research Chair in Expansive Soils, Civil Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia

Funding

King Saud University

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. (2018). Standard Test Method for Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Shallow Pavement Applications (Standard No. ASTM D6951/D6951M-18). Available online: www.astm.org/d6951_d6951m-18.html.
2. Assessment of shear strength for liner cover layers at different environmental exposures
3. Assessment of crushed shales for use as compacted landfill liners10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.06.001 ↗
4. Geotechnical analysis of two Nigerian soils for use as clay liners liners10.1007/s10064-009-0189-y ↗
5. An assessment of permeability of clay liners: Two case histories. Geological society, London
6. Daniel, D.E. (1993). Geotechnical Practice for Waste Disposal, Chapman & Hall.10.1007/978-1-4615-3070-1 ↗
7. Dafalla, M.A. (2015). Efficiency of Sand Clay Liners in Controlling Subsurface Water Flow. Engineering Geology for Society and Territory, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-09054-2_101 ↗
8. British Standards Institution (BSI) (1990). British Standard Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes, British Standards Institution. BS 1377-2.
9. (2017). Geotechnical Investigation and Testing—Laboratory Testing of Soil—Part 6: Fall Cone Test (Standard No. ISO 17892-6:2017).
10. A new approach to determination of shear strength of clays by the fall-cone test
11. Spagnoli, G. (2006). Comparazione delle Prove Penetrometriche Dinamiche in Europa conCorrelazioni Geotecniche. [Master Thesis, Universitá degli Studi di Milano Bicocca]. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228348623_An_Empirical_Correlation_Between_Different_Dynamic_Penetrometers.
12. An Empirical Correlation Between Different Dynamic Penetrometers
13. Correlation between soil erodibility and light penetrometer blows: A case study in Sungai Langat, Malaysia10.1016/j.pce.2022.103262 ↗
14. DIN—Deutsches Institut für Normung (2002). Erkundung und Untersuchung des Baugrunds, DIN.
15. Expansion of cavities in infinite soil mass10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001740 ↗
17. Cavity expansion in cohesive frictional soils10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.349 ↗
18. Assessment of soil parameters from pressuremeter tests in unsaturated soils
19. Schnaid, F., Sills, G.C., and Consoli, N.C. (1996). Pressuremeter Tests in Unsaturated Soils. Advances in Site Investigation Practice, Thomas Telford.
20. An Analytical Study of the Cone Penetration Test in Clay10.1680/geot.1991.41.1.17 ↗
21. Analysis of steady cone penetration in clay10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:7(594) ↗
22. Cavity expansion analyses of crushable granular materials with state-dependent dilatancy10.1002/nag.1027 ↗
23. Dynamic analysis of a smooth penetrometer free-falling into uniform clay10.1680/geot.10.P.055 ↗
24. Collins, R., and Miller, G.A. (2014). Cone Penetration Testing in Unsaturated Soils at Two Instrumented Test Sites. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils, CRC Press. UNSAT Balkema Lisse.10.1201/b17034-217 ↗
25. Evaluating Degree Of Compaction Of Levees Using Cone Penetration Testing
26. (2000). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort (12 400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3)) (Standard No. ASTM D698).
27. (2011). Standard Test Method for Direct Shear Test of Soils Under Consolidated Drained Conditions (Standard No. ASTM D3080).
28. (2021). Standard Test Method for One Dimensional Swell or Collapse of Soils (Standard No. ASTM D4546).
29. (2011). Standard Test Methods for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils Using Incremental Loading (Standard No. ASTM D2435/D2435M-11).
30. The Compressibility and Swell of Mixtures for Sand-Clay Liners10.1155/2017/3181794 ↗
31. Shaker, A.A., Dafalla, M., Al-Mahbashi, A.M., and Al-Shamrani, M.A. (2022). Predicting Hydraulic Conductivity for Flexible Wall Conditions Using Rigid Wall Permeameter. Water, 14.10.3390/w14030286 ↗
32. Al-Mahbashi, A., Dafalla, M., Shaker, A., and Al-Shamrani, M. (2021). Sustainable and Stable Clay Sand Liners over Time. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13147840 ↗
33. Effects of confining pressure and effective stress on hydraulic conductivity of sand-clay mixtures10.1007/s12517-015-1925-1 ↗
34. Mollins, L.H. (1996). The Design of Bentonite—Sand Mixtures. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds].