Impact of Slope Orientation on Inlet Spacing: Gutter Flow Analyses
Source abstract
Abstract
A roadway’s capacity to drain itself is of utmost importance for the safety and comfort of its users. Standing water and any amount of channelized flow on roadways create nuisances to the users, and the extent of encroachment into the lanes and the water-film thickness over the lanes are crucial for motorists with relatively high speed. Guidelines cover a wide range of subjects from size and type of inlets, which capture the channelized flow for conveyance into enclosed drains, to the decision for slope orientation, but the guidelines seem to lack in checking the depth of channelized flow. HEC-22 (the urban drainage design manual of US Department of Transportation) endorses limiting the flow depths to curb height (as if the concern is no longer the roadway users) and fixes the criterion for the inlet spacing (restricted to 90 to 150 m) to maximum allowable flow spreads. This study analyzed the maximum allowable inlet spacing via setting three criteria: fixed maximums to flow depth, spread for the channel flow, and to over-lane water-film thickness. The impact of slope orientation on inlet spacing is tested along with some other factors for roadways of two types (local and highway). The results were graphed for various uniform slope orientations under a wide range of rainfall intensities for the determined inlet spacing values. This was performed by combining a kinematic wave equation solution to dismiss the conditions that lead to hydroplaning depths when using the Rational Method and Manning’s equation to obtain water depths and inlet spacings for an inlet of full capture capacity. It is found that the allowable spacing values do not constitute any major restrictions in highway setting (3 m shoulder) in terms of recommended spacing. In the local setting, however, with a maximum spread of 1.8 m, maximum allowable inlet spacing becomes a limitation in many orientations, and slope optimization under such conditions becomes crucial at times when providing the same spacing for two orientations.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes · Hydraulic flow and structures · Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas 58140, Turkey
Hydraulics and Water Resources Lab, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, Istanbul 80626, Turkey
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO (2018). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, American Association of State Highway and Transport Officials. [7th ed.].
2. Further Improvement in a Criterion for Human Stability in Floodwaters10.1111/jfr3.12486 ↗
3. Experimental Study of the Stability of Pedestrians Exposed to Urban Pluvial Flooding10.1007/s11069-016-2242-z ↗
4. Using Web-based Observations to Identify Thresholds of a Person’s Stability in a Flow10.1002/2016WR019182 ↗
5. Review and Analysis of Vehicle Stability Models during Floods and Proposal for Future Improvements10.1111/jfr3.12551 ↗
6. Stability Criteria for Flooded Vehicles: A State-of-the-art Review
7. A New Experiments-Based Methodology to Define the Stability Threshold for any Vehicle Exposed to Flooding10.1080/1573062X.2017.1301501 ↗
8. Analysis and Modeling of Flooding in Urban Drainage Systems10.1016/S0022-1694(04)00374-9 ↗
9. Criterion of Vehicle Instability in Floodwaters: Past, Present and Future10.1080/15715124.2019.1566240 ↗
10. Walsh, I.D. (2011). Chapter 31 Highway Design Principles and Practice: An Introduction. ICE Manual of Highway Design and Management, Thomas Telford Ltd.10.1680/mohd.41110 ↗
11. Michalek, A., Husic, A., Roundy, J., and Hansen, A.T. (2021). Assessment of Climatic and Anthropogenic Controls on Bridge Deck Drainage and Sediment Removal. Water, 13.10.3390/w13243556 ↗
12. Brown, S., Schall, J., Morris, J., Doherty, C., Stein, S., and Warner, J. (2009). Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 22, 3rd Edition: Urban Drainage Design Manual. National Highway Institute, Federal Highway Administration.
13. Gallaway, B., Ivey, D., Hayes, G., Ledbetter, W., Olson, R., Woods, D., and Schiller, R. (1979). Pavement and Geometric Design Criteria for Minimizing Hydroplaning, Federal Highway Administration.
14. Ross, N., and Russam, K. (1968). The Depth of Rain Water on Road Surfaces, Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne.
15. Wolff, A. (2013). Simulation of Pavement Surface Runoff using the Depth-Averaged Shallow Water Equations, University of Stuttgart.
16. Modelling and Simulation of Pavement Drainage10.1080/10298436.2017.1347437 ↗
17. Hydrological Considerations in Designing Roadways: Avoiding Hydroplaning10.18400/tekderg.989134 ↗
18. Spaliviero, F., May, R., and Escarameia, M. (2000). Spacing of Road Gullies Hydraulic Performance of BS EN 124 Gully Gratings and Kerb Inlets, HR.
19. Effect of Maximum Flood Width on Road Drainage Inlet Spacing10.2166/wst.1997.0673 ↗
20. Gómez, M., Sánchez, H., Malgrat, P., Castillo, F., Sunyer, D., and Nanía, L. (2002). Inlet Spacing Considering the Risk Associated to Runoff. Application to Streets and Critical Points of the City of Barcelona. Glob. Solut. Urban Drain., 1–13.10.1061/40644(2002)276 ↗
21. What is Nuisance Flooding? Defining and Monitoring an Emerging Challenge10.1029/2018WR022828 ↗
22. Kinematic Wave Method for Determination of Road Drainage Inlet Spacing10.1016/0309-1708(94)90009-4 ↗
23. Formulas for Time of Travel in Channel with Upstream Inflow10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2001)6:5(416) ↗
24. Hydraulic Efficiency of Grate and Curb Inlets for Urban Storm Drainage10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000552 ↗
25. Hydraulic Efficiency of Continuous Transverse Grates for Paved Areas10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2009)135:2(225) ↗
26. Design of Grate Inlets with a Clogging Factor10.1016/S1093-0191(00)00013-7 ↗
27. Hammonds, M.A., and Holley, E. (1995). Hydraulic Characteristics of Flush Depressed Curb Inlets and Bridge Deck Drains, Federal Highway Administration Technical Report FHWA/TX-96/1409-1 Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin.
28. Hodges, B.R., Barrett, M.E., Ashraf, M., Engineer, H., and Schalla, F.E. (2018). Interception Capacity of Conventional Depressed Curb Inlets and Inlets with Channel Extension, Center for Transportation Research at the University of Texas at Austin.
29. Muhammad, A.M. (2018). Interception Capacity of Curb Opening Inlets, University of Texas at Austin.
30. Methodology to Estimate the Hydraulic Efficiency of Nontested Continuous Transverse Grates10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000625 ↗
31. Schalla, F.E. (2016). Effects of Flush Slab Supports on the Hydraulic Performance of Curb Inlets and an Analysis of Design Equations. Effects of Flush Slab Supports on the Hydraulic Performance of Curb Inlets and an Analysis of Design Equations, University of Texas at Austin.
32. Izzard, C.F. (1946, January 5–8). Hydraulics of runoff from developed surfaces. Proceedings of the Highway Research Board Proceedings, Washington, DC, USA.
33. The Relation between the Rainfall and the Discharge of Sewers in Populous Districts10.1061/TACEAT.0000694 ↗
34. On the Flow of Water in Open Channels, Supplement
35. Kinematic Wave Model of Urban Pavement Rainfall-Runoff Subject to Traffic Loadings10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2003)129:7(629) ↗
36. Aranda, J., Beneyto, Á.C., Sánchez-Juny, M., and Bladé, E. (2021). Efficient Design of Road Drainage Systems. Water, 13.10.3390/w13121661 ↗
37. Westlake, M. (2011). Chapter 33 Geometric Design. ICE Manual of Highway Design and Management, Thomas Telford Ltd.
38. Izzard, C.F. (1950). Tentative Results on Capacity of Curb opening Inlets, Research Board.
39. Discharge Capacity for Curb-Opening Inlets10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1992)118:7(1048) ↗
40. Limitations of Traditional Capacity Equations for Long Curb Inlets10.3141/2638-11 ↗
41. A Field and Laboratory Investigation of Kerb Side Inlet Pits using Four Media Types10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.021 ↗
42. Shevade, L.J., and Montalto, F.A. (2021). Forensic Investigation of Four Monitored Green Infrastructure Inlets. Water, 13.10.3390/w13131787 ↗
43. Russo, B., Valentín, M.G., and Tellez-Álvarez, J. (2021). The Relevance of Grated Inlets within Surface Drainage Systems in the Field of Urban Flood Resilience. A Review of several Experimental and Numerical Simulation Approaches. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13137189 ↗