Heat Conduction Plate Layout Optimization Using Physics-Driven Convolutional Neural Networks
Source abstract
Abstract
Optimizing heat conduction layout is essential during engineering design, especially for sensible thermal products. However, when the optimization algorithm iteratively evaluates different loading cases, the traditional numerical simulation methods usually lead to a substantial computational cost. To effectively reduce the computational effort, data-driven approaches are used to train a surrogate model as a mapping between the prescribed external loads and various geometry. However, the existing model is trained by data-driven methods, which require intensive training samples from numerical simulations and do not effectively solve the problem. Choosing the steady heat conduction problems as examples, this paper proposes a physics-driven convolutional neural networks (PD-CNNs) method to infer the physical field solutions for randomly varied loading cases. After that, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is used to optimize the sizes, and the positions of the hole masks in the prescribed design domain and the average temperature value of the entire heat conduction field is minimized. The goal of reducing heat transfer is achieved. Compared with the existing data-driven approaches, the proposed PD-CNN optimization framework predicts field solutions that are highly consistent with conventional simulation results. However, the proposed method generates the solution space without pre-obtained training data. We obtained thermal intensity results for holes 1, hole 2, hole 3, and hole 4 with 0.3948, 0.007, 0.0044, and 0.3939, respectively, by optimization PD-CNN model.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Heat Transfer and Optimization · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Heat Transfer Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
Department of Information Engineering, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
TUM School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, 85748 Garching, Germany
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Bendsoe, M.P., and Sigmund, O. (2003). Topology Optimization: Theory, Methods, and Applications, Springer Science & Business Media.
2. Optimization of the heat source distribution for two-dimensional heat conduction using the bionic method10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.09.041 ↗
3. Hughes, T.J. (2012). The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis, Courier Corporation.
4. Application of the meshless generalized finite difference method to inverse heat source problems10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.12.084 ↗
5. The heat source layout optimization using deep learning surrogate modeling10.1007/s00158-020-02659-4 ↗
6. Machine learning-driven real-time topology optimization under moving morphable component-based framework10.1115/1.4041319 ↗
7. Machine learning for fluid mechanics10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 ↗
8. Supervised learning mixing characteristics of film cooling in a rocket combustor using convolutional neural networks10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.05.021 ↗
9. Generative adversarial networks with physical evaluators for spray simulation of pintle injector10.1063/5.0056549 ↗
10. Status, challenges, and potential for machine learning in understanding and applying heat transfer phenomena10.1115/1.4052510 ↗
11. Farimani, A.B., Gomes, J., and Pande, V.S. (2017). Deep learning the physics of transport phenomena. arXiv.
12. Tanaka, A., Tomiya, A., and Hashimoto, K. (2021). Deep Learning and Physics, Springer.10.1007/978-981-33-6108-9 ↗
13. Machine and deep learning applications in particle physics10.1142/S0217751X19300199 ↗
14. Machine learning and the physical sciences10.1103/RevModPhys.91.045002 ↗
15. Saponara, S., Elhanashi, A., and Gagliardi, A. (2020, January 14–17). Exploiting R-CNN for video smoke/fire sensing in antifire surveillance indoor and outdoor systems for smart cities. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing (SMARTCOMP), Bologna, Italy.10.1109/SMARTCOMP50058.2020.00083 ↗
16. Recreating fingerprint images by convolutional neural network autoencoder architecture10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3124746 ↗
17. Bekkerman, R., Bilenko, M., and Langford, J. (2011). Scaling Up Machine Learning: Parallel and Distributed Approaches, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139042918 ↗
18. Machine learning10.1146/annurev.cs.04.060190.002221 ↗
19. Data-driven multi-scale multi-physics models to derive process–structure-property relationships for additive manufacturing10.1007/s00466-018-1539-z ↗
20. Zhang, Z.J., and Duraisamy, K. (2015, January 22–26). Machine learning methods for data-driven turbulence modeling. Proceedings of the 22nd AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics the conference, Dallas, TX, USA.10.2514/6.2015-2460 ↗
21. Data-driven computational mechanics10.1016/j.cma.2016.02.001 ↗
22. Physics-based and data-driven surrogate models for pumping optimization of coastal aquifers
23. Data-driven physics for human soft tissue animation10.1145/3072959.3073685 ↗
24. Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data10.1017/S0022112010001217 ↗
25. Anzai, Y. (2012). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Elsevier.
26. Neural networks for topology optimization10.1515/rnam-2019-0018 ↗
27. Surrogate optimization of deep neural networks for groundwater predictions
28. Deep learning methods for Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of airfoil flows10.2514/1.J058291 ↗
29. Prediction of aerodynamic flow fields using convolutional neural networks10.1007/s00466-019-01740-0 ↗
30. Chen, J., Viquerat, J., and Hachem, E. (2019). U-net architectures for fast prediction of incompressible laminar flows. arXiv.
31. Application of deep learning-based multi-fidelity surrogate model to robust aerodynamic design optimization10.1016/j.ast.2019.07.002 ↗
32. Deep learning-based surrogate modeling and optimization for microalgal biofuel production and photobioreactor design10.1002/aic.16473 ↗
33. Eismann, S., Bartzsch, S., and Ermon, S. (2017). Shape optimization in laminar flow with a label-guided variational autoencoder. arXiv.
34. Efficient aerodynamic shape optimization with deep-learning-based geometric filtering10.2514/1.J059254 ↗
35. Numerical investigation of minimum drag profiles in laminar flow using deep learning surrogates10.1017/jfm.2021.398 ↗
36. Optimization of the semi-sphere vortex generator for film cooling using the generative adversarial networks10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.122026 ↗
37. Ma, H., Zhang, Y., Thuerey, N., Hu, X., and Haidn, O.J. (2021). Physics-driven learning of the steady Navier-Stokes equations using deep convolutional neural networks. arXiv.10.4208/cicp.OA-2021-0146 ↗
38. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., and Karniadakis, G.E. (2017). Physics informed deep learning (part i): Data-driven solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations. arXiv.
39. Physics-constrained deep learning for high-dimensional surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification without labeled data10.1016/j.jcp.2019.05.024 ↗
40. Modeling the dynamics of PDE systems with physics-constrained deep auto-regressive networks10.1016/j.jcp.2019.109056 ↗
41. Ma, H., Hu, X., Zhang, Y., Thuerey, N., and Haidn, O.J. (2020). A Combined Data-driven and Physics-driven Method for Steady Heat Conduction Prediction using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. arXiv.
42. DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equations10.1137/19M1274067 ↗
43. Surrogate modeling for fluid flows based on physics-constrained deep learning without simulation data10.1016/j.cma.2019.112732 ↗
44. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., and Brox, T. (2015, January 5–9). U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
45. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library
46. Convolutional neural networks: An overview and application in radiology10.1007/s13244-018-0639-9 ↗
47. Ruder, S. (2016). An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. arXiv.
48. Kingma, D.P., and Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv.
49. MaxwellNet: Physics-driven deep neural network training based on Maxwell’s equations10.1063/5.0071616 ↗
50. Sharma, R., Farimani, A.B., Gomes, J., Eastman, P., and Pande, V. (2018). Weakly-supervised deep learning of heat transport via physics informed loss. arXiv.
51. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. (December, January 27). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the ICNN’95-International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, WA, Australia.
52. Yang, X.S., and Deb, S. (2009, January 9–11). Cuckoo search via Lévy flights. Proceedings of the 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC), Coimbatore, India.10.1109/NABIC.2009.5393690 ↗
53. An optimizing method based on autonomous animats: Fish-swarm algorithm
54. A novel particle swarm optimization based on prey-predator relationship10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.008 ↗
55. Review of handbook of nature-inspired and innovative computing by Albert Y. Zomaya10.1145/2078162.2078167 ↗
56. Kennedy, J. (2006). Swarm intelligence. Handbook of Nature-Inspired and Innovative Computing, Springer.10.1007/0-387-27705-6_6 ↗
57. and Shi, Y. (2001, January 27–30). Particle swarm optimization: Developments, applications, and resources. Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE Cat. No. 01TH8546), Seoul, Korea.
58. A 99-line topology optimization code written in Matlab10.1007/s001580050176 ↗
59. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2 ↗
60. An engineer’s approach to optimal material distribution and shape finding10.1016/0045-7825(93)90182-W ↗
61. Huang, X., and Xie, M. (2010). Evolutionary Topology Optimization of Continuum Structures: Methods and Applications, John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470689486 ↗
62. Mueller, L., and Verstraete, T. (2019). Adjoint-based multi-point and multi-objective optimization of a turbocharger radial turbine. Int. J. Turbomach. Propuls. Power, 4.10.3390/ijtpp4020010 ↗
63. Milani, A., Santucci, V., and Leung, C. (2009, January 15–18). Optimizing web content presentation: A online PSO approach. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Milan, Italy.10.1109/WI-IAT.2009.222 ↗
64. Niasar, N.S., Shanbezade, J., Perdam, M., and Mohajeri, M. (2009, January 17–20). Discrete fuzzy particle swarm optimization for solving traveling salesman problem. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Information and Financial Engineering, Singapore.10.1109/ICIFE.2009.37 ↗