Dynamic Viewpoint Selection for Sweet Pepper Maturity Classification Using Online Economic Decisions
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a rule-based methodology for dynamic viewpoint selection for maturity classification of red and yellow sweet peppers. The method makes an online decision to capture an additional next-best viewpoint based on an economic analysis that considers potential misclassification and robot operational costs. The next-best viewpoint is selected based on color variations on the pepper. Peppers were classified into mature and immature using a random forest classifier based on principle components of various color features derived from an RGB-D camera. The method first attempts to classify maturity based on a single viewpoint. An additional viewpoint is acquired and added to the point cloud only when it is deemed profitable. The methodology was evaluated using leave-one-out cross-validation on datasets of 69 red and 70 yellow sweet peppers from three different maturity stages. Classification accuracy was increased by 6% and 5% using dynamic viewpoint selection along with 52% and 12% decrease in economic costs for red and yellow peppers, respectively, compared to using a single viewpoint. Sensitivity analyses were performed for misclassification and robot operational costs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Smart Agriculture and AI · Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses · Remote Sensing in Agriculture
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Farm Technology Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel
Funding
European Commission · Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · Rabbi W. Gunther Plaut Chair in Manufacturing Engineering
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Ang, M.H., Khatib, O., and Siciliano, B. (2020). Robotics in Agriculture. Encyclopedia of Robotics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-41610-1 ↗
2. Grabot, B., Vallespir, B., Gomes, S., Bouras, A., and Kiritsis, D. (2014). Simulation Analysis of Sweet Pepper Harvesting Operations. Advances in Production Management Systems. Innovative and Knowledge-Based Production Management in a Global-Local World, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-44733-8 ↗
3. Harvesting Robots for High-value Crops: State-of-the-art Review and Challenges Ahead10.1002/rob.21525 ↗
4. Development of a sweet pepper harvesting robot10.1002/rob.21937 ↗
5. Computer vision for fruit harvesting robots—State of the art and challenges ahead10.1504/IJCVR.2012.046419 ↗
6. Selective Harvesting Robotics: Current Research, Trends, and Future Directions10.1007/s43154-020-00034-1 ↗
7. Changes in physicochemical attributes of sweet pepper cv. Domino during fruit growth and development10.1016/S0304-4238(01)00317-X ↗
8. Electronic-Nose Applications for Fruit Identification, Ripeness and Quality Grading10.3390/s150100899 ↗
9. Tan, S., Zhang, L., and Yang, J. (August, January 30). Sensing fruit ripeness using wireless signals. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), Hangzhou, China.
10. Non-destructive prediction of internal and external quality attributes of fruit with thick rind: A review10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.08.009 ↗
11. Measurement of optical properties of fruits and vegetables: A review10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.111003 ↗
12. Innovative nondestructive imaging techniques for ripening and maturity of fruits—A review of recent applications10.1016/j.tifs.2017.12.010 ↗
13. Maturity classification of sweet peppers using image datasets acquired in different times10.1016/j.compind.2020.103274 ↗
14. Semenov, V., and Mitelman, Y. (2020, January 14–15). Non-destructive Fruit Quality Control Using Radioelectronics: A Review. Proceedings of the 2020 Ural Symposium on Biomedical Engineering, Radioelectronics and Information Technology (USBEREIT), Yekaterinburg, Russia.10.1109/USBEREIT48449.2020.9117644 ↗
15. Performance Evaluation of a Harvesting Robot for Sweet Pepper10.1002/rob.21709 ↗
16. Autonomous Sweet Pepper Harvesting for Protected Cropping Systems10.1109/LRA.2017.2655622 ↗
17. Hemming, J., Bac, C.W., van Tuijl, B.A., Barth, R., Bontsema, J., Pekkeriet, E., and van Henten, E.J. (2014, January 6–10). A robot for harvesting sweet-pepper in greenhouses. Proceedings of the International Conference of Agricultural Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland.
18. Evaluation of a strawberry-harvesting robot in a field test10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2009.09.011 ↗
19. An autonomous strawberry-harvesting robot: Design, development, integration, and field evaluation10.1002/rob.21889 ↗
20. Apple maturity discrimination and positioning system in an apple harvesting robot10.1080/00288230709510392 ↗
21. Tomato maturity evaluation using color image analysis10.13031/2013.27827 ↗
22. Vision-based judgment of tomato maturity under growth conditions
23. Deep Learning Based Improved Classification System for Designing Tomato Harvesting Robot10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2879324 ↗
24. Date Fruit Classification for Robotic Harvesting in a Natural Environment Using Deep Learning10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2936536 ↗
25. Brown, J., and Sukkarieh, S. (2020). Design and Evaluation of a Modular Robotic Plum Harvesting System Utilising Soft Components. arXiv.10.1002/rob.21987 ↗
26. Automatic detection of mango ripening stages—An application of information technology to botany10.1016/j.scienta.2018.03.057 ↗
27. Fruit maturity, ripening, and quality relationships10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.485.27 ↗
28. Ripening-induced chemical and antioxidant changes in bell peppers as affected by harvest maturity and postharvest ethylene exposure10.21273/HORTSCI.40.3.732 ↗
29. Sweet pepper maturity evaluation10.1017/S2040470017001236 ↗
30. Harel, B., Kurtser, P., Herck, L.V., Parmet, Y., and Edan, Y. (2016, January 26–29). Sweet pepper maturity evaluation via multiple viewpoints color analyses. Proceedings of the International Conference on Agricultural Engineering CIGR-AgEng, Aarhus, Denmark.
31. Harel, B., van Essen, R., Parmet, Y., and Edan, Y. (2020). Viewpoint Analysis for Maturity Classification of Sweet Peppers. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20133783 ↗
32. Harel, B., Edan, Y., and Perlman, Y. (2022). Optimization Model for Selective Harvest Planning Performed by Humans and Robots. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12052507 ↗
33. Active recognition through next view planning: A survey10.1016/j.patcog.2003.01.002 ↗
34. Vázquez, P.P., Feixas, M., Sbert, M., and Heidrich, W. (2001, January 21–23). Viewpoint Selection using Viewpoint Entropy. Proceedings of the Vision Modeling and Visualization Conference (VMV-01), Stuttgart, Germany.
35. Active Perception10.1109/5.5968 ↗
36. Information-Based Objective Functions for Active Data Selection10.1162/neco.1992.4.4.590 ↗
37. Foix, S., Alenyà, G., and Torras, C. (October, January 28). 3D Sensor planning framework for leaf probing. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Hamburg, Germany.
38. Kurtser, P., and Edan, Y. (2018, January 1–5). The use of dynamic sensing strategies to improve detection for a pepper harvesting robot. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Madrid, Spain.10.1109/IROS.2018.8593746 ↗
39. Fruit detectability analysis for different camera positions in sweet-pepper10.3390/s140406032 ↗
40. Statistical models for fruit detectability: Spatial and temporal analyses of sweet peppers10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.04.017 ↗
41. boerenbond.be (2020, June 12). Boerenbond. Paprika. Available online: https://www.boerenbond.be/markten/groenten/paprika.
42. sweeper-robot.eu (2019, December 17). Sweeper FAQ. Available online: http://www.sweeper-robot.eu/10-article/54-sweeper-faq.
43. A Mathematical Theory of Communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
44. Performance improvements of a sweet pepper harvesting robot in protected cropping environments10.1002/rob.21973 ↗
45. A framework for actively selecting viewpoints in object recognition10.1142/S0218001409007351 ↗
46. Zemmour, E., Kurtser, P., and Edan, Y. (2019). Automatic parameter tuning for adaptive thresholding in fruit detection. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19092130 ↗
47. Arad, B., Kurtser, P., Barnea, E., Harel, B., Edan, Y., and Ben-Shahar, O. (2019). Controlled lighting and illumination-independent target detection for real-time cost-efficient applications. The case study of sweet pepper robotic harvesting. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19061390 ↗
48. Sa, I., Ge, Z., Dayoub, F., Upcroft, B., Perez, T., and Mccool, C. (2016). DeepFruits: A Fruit Detection System Using Deep Neural Networks. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16081222 ↗
49. Adaptive thresholding with fusion using a RGBD sensor for red sweet-pepper detection10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.12.002 ↗