journal article·2022-07-20Open access

Evaluation of the Influence of Rootstock Type on the Yield Parameters of Vines Using a Mathematical Model in Nontraditional Wine-Growing Conditions

Kamila Klimek, Karol Postawa, Magdalena Kapłan, Marek Kułażyński

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 14

Abstract

Great interest in viticulture in temperate climates results from the introduction of new interspecies hybrids of grapevines which are quite popular due to their high resistance to fungal diseases and lower temperature. However, the impact of rootstocks, common in vine cultivation, is little to not known, which makes setting up vineyards a challenge. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the following six rootstock types: 101-14 Mgt, SORI, 161-49 C, 5 BB, SO4, 125 AA, and grapevines with their own roots on the yield quantity and berry quality (expressed by Brix extract) of Regent grapevines in temperate climates (southeastern Poland). A five-year experiment alongside a novel numerical model is applied to formulate precise and constructive findings about the rootstock impact in a temperate climate. Both the experimental and numerical part are supported by detailed statistical analysis. The five-year period of study indicates that the vines on rootstock 125 AA yielded the best, significantly. Shrubs grafted on rootstock 161-49 yielded the lowest, while the fruit extract content grafted on rootstock 101-14 was significantly lower among the evaluated ones. The parameters of own-rooted bushes and those grafted on SO4 rootstock did not differ significantly, except for the extract. The model leads to convergent conclusions with statistical analysis of raw experimental data. The 125 AA rootstock was the best for all nine tested case scenarios. On the other hand, 161-49 rootstock was the weakest, justified only in the most challenging conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Horticultural and Viticultural Research · Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies · Fermentation and Sensory Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Applied Mathematics and Informatics, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Głęboka 28, 20-612 Lublin, Poland

Faculty of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Gdańska 7/9, 50-344 Wrocław, Poland

Department of Pomology, Nursery and Enology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Gleboka 28, 20-612 Lublin, Poland

Funding

a statutory activity for the year 2021 from the Polish Minister of Education and Science

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Grape Stalk: A First Attempt to Disentangle Its Fibres via Electrostatic Separation10.1016/j.fbp.2020.10.006 ↗
2. Bettenfeld, P., Canals, J.C.I., Jacquens, L., Fernandez, O., Fontaine, F., van Schaik, E., Courty, P.E., and Trouvelot, S. (2021). The Microbiota of the Grapevine Holobiont: A Key Component of Plant Health. J. Adv. Res.10.1016/j.jare.2021.12.008 ↗
3. Cantu, D., and Walker, M.A. (2019). Grapes in the World Economy. The Grape Genome, Compendium of Plant Genomes; Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-18601-2 ↗
4. (2022, July 06). FAOSTAT, (Food and Agriculture Organization). Available online: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL.
5. Myśliwiec, R. (2009). Uprawa Winorośli, Plantpress.
6. Genetic Analysis of Vitis Interspecific Hybrids Occurring in Vineyards of the Czech Republic
7. Use of Hybrids in Viticulture. A Challenge for the OIV10.20870/oeno-one.2018.52.3.2312 ↗
8. Optimisation and Numerical Simulation of Shearing Blade Used for Citrus Seedling Grafting10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.01.006 ↗
9. Rootstock Effects on the Adaptive Strategies of Grapevine (Vitis Vinifera L. Cv. Cabernet–Sauvignon) under Contrasting Water Status: Leaf Physiological and Structural Responses10.1016/j.agee.2008.05.006 ↗
10. The Importance of Clonal Selection of Grapevine and the Role of Selected Clones in Production of Healthy Propagating Stocks10.31421/IJHS/17/3/953 ↗
11. Evaluation of Eight Rootstocks on the Growth and Berry Quality of ‘Marselan’ Grapevines10.1016/j.scienta.2018.12.050 ↗
12. Yield Performance of New Juice Grape Varieties Grafted onto Different Rootstocks under Tropical Conditions10.1016/j.scienta.2018.06.085 ↗
13. Robinson, J. (1999). The Oxford Companion to Wine, Oxford University Press. [2nd ed.].
14. Improving Water Use Efficiency of Vineyards in Semi-Arid Regions. A Review10.1007/s13593-014-0280-z ↗
15. Sensory Properties of ’Cabernet Sauvignon’ Wines as Affected by Rootstock and Season10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.754.58 ↗
16. Analysis of Genetic Relatedness among Grapevine Rootstocks by AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism) Markers
17. Rootstock Effects on Deficit-Irrigated Winegrapes in a Dry Climate: Vigor, Yield Formation, and Fruit Ripening10.5344/ajev.2011.11078 ↗
18. Cabernet Sauvignon Grapevine Grafted onto Rootstocks during the Autumn-Winter Season in Southeastern Brazilian10.1590/0103-9016-2014-0031 ↗
19. Vilanova, M., Genisheva, Z., Tubío, M., Alvarez, K., Lissarrague, J.R., and Oliveira, J.M. (2021). Rootstock Effect on Volatile Composition of Albariño Wines. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11052135 ↗
20. Influence of Some Rootstocks on the Performance of Red Globe Grape Cultivar
21. Sampaio, T.L.B. (2007). Using Rootstocks to Manipulate Vine Physiological Performance and Mediate Changes in Fruit and Wine Composition, Oregon State University.
22. Effect of Rootstock on Yield Quantity and Quality of Grapevine ‘Regent’ in southeastern Poland
23. Effect of Rootstock on the Production, Grape and Wine Quality of Shiraz Vines in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area10.1071/EA9860511 ↗
24. Cane and Bud Hardiness of Selected Grapevine Rootstocks10.5344/ajev.1988.39.1.55 ↗
25. Cane and Bud Hardiness of Own-Rooted White Riesling and Scions of White Riesling and Chardonnay Grafted to Selected Rootstocks10.5344/ajev.1988.39.1.60 ↗
26. Influence of rootstock and height of training system on spring frost sensibility of Chardonnay and Cabernet Sauvignon grape cultivars in the Umbria region
27. Influence of Eight Rootstocks on the Performance of ’White Riesling’ and ’Cabernet Franc’ over Five Years
28. Influence of Three Different Rootstock Varieties and Two Training Systems on the Efficiency of the Grape Cultivar Grüner Veltliner in Klosterneuburg
29. Sultana Fruitfulness and Yield as Influenced by Season, Rootstock and Trellis Type10.1111/j.1755-0238.2001.tb00189.x ↗
30. Influence of Rootstocks on Growth Yield and Fruit Composition of Thompson Seedless Grapes Grown in the Pune Region of India
31. Variation in Mineral Composition and Effects on the Growth and Yield of Chardonnay Grapes on Various Rootstocks
32. Effect of Rootstock on Vegetative Activity and Yield in Grapevine
33. Performance of ‘Gewurztraminer’ (Vitis Vinifera L.) on Three Rootsystems
34. Rootstocks Impact Vine Performance and Fruit Composition of Grapes in British Columbia
35. Effect of Fourteen Rootstocks on Yield, Vigor, and Longevity of Twelve Varieties of Grapes at Meridian, Mississippi
36. Increased Winegrapes Yields with Rootstocks
37. Rootstock Effects on Vegetative-Productive Indices in Grapevine Cv Erbaluce Trained to Pergola System10.17660/ActaHortic.1996.427.28 ↗
38. Influence of Rootstock on Bud Break, Period of Anthesis, Fruit Set, Fruit Ripening, Heat Unit Requirement and Berry Yield of Commercial Grape Varieties10.3923/ijpbg.2015.126.135 ↗
39. Tapping the Potential of Grafting to Improve the Performance of Vegetable Cropping Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. A Review10.1007/s13593-020-00628-1 ↗
40. Deep Learning and Computer Vision for Assessing the Number of Actual Berries in Commercial Vineyards10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2022.04.015 ↗
41. Multiscale Modelling Techniques in Life Cycle Assessment: Application to Nanostructured Polymer Systems in the Maritime Industry
42. Mammarella, M., Comba, L., Biglia, A., Dabbene, F., and Gay, P. (2021). Cooperation of Unmanned Systems for Agricultural Applications: A Case Study in a Vineyard. Biosyst. Eng.10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.12.010 ↗
43. Measuring Optimality Degrees of Microclimate Parameters in Protected Cultivation of Tomato under Tropical Climate Condition10.1016/j.measurement.2017.02.028 ↗
44. Automatic Irrigation System with Rain Fall Detection in Agricultural Field10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107552 ↗
45. Benchmarking Optimization Methods for Parameter Estimation in Large Kinetic Models10.1093/bioinformatics/bty736 ↗
46. Scatter Search and Local NLP Solvers: A Multistart Framework for Global Optimization10.1287/ijoc.1060.0175 ↗
47. Postawa, K., Szczygieł, J., and Kułażyński, M. (2020). Methods for Anaerobic Digestion Model Fitting–Comparison between Heuristic and Automatic Approach. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery.10.1007/s13399-020-00945-1 ↗
48. The Effects of Rootstocks and Training Systems on the Growth and Fruit Quality of the ’Round Seedless’ Grape
49. Ilhan, I., Yilmaz, N., and Gokçay, E. (1998, January 20–23). Comparision of Some Rootstocks Used for ‘Round Seedless’ Grape Variety from the Point of Yield and Quality. Proceedings of the 4th Viticulture Symposium, Yalova, Turkey.
50. The Researches on the Effects of Some Rootstocks on Yield, Quality and Vegetative Growth of Round Seedless Cultivar
51. Rootstock Effects on Chardonel Productivity, Fruit, and Wine Composition10.5344/ajev.2002.53.1.37 ↗