journal article·2022-07-14Open access

Predicting Tensile Strength for Prestressed Reinforced Concrete-Driven Piles

Thuyet N. Nguyen, Thang Q. Pham, Thuy T. Vu, Adnan A. Malik, Duc N. Dinh

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 14

Abstract

Reinforced concrete piles installed by impact hammers have been used as a common solution for deep foundations because they are cost effective and require less time for construction. Driven piles are often used in large volumes for infrastructure and industrial projects in rural areas. Unlike other installation methods, installing piles using impact hammers can generate tensile stress during construction, which can result in pile failures. Induced tensile stress occurs when piles are being driven through a hard soil layer to a softer soil layer, and transverse cracks happen when induced tensile stress exceeds the pile tensile strength. This issue is not explicitly stated in most standards; the rare code that mentions this issue is AASHTO 2014. AASHTO 2014 uses correlations between the concrete tensile and compressive strengths to obtain the pile tensile strength. However, data collected from more than 1300 tests on the correlations between the concrete tensile and compressive strengths show that the concrete pile tensile strengths obtained using AASHTO 2014 are significantly conservative. This paper provides an adjustment in the correlation for the tensile strength based on previous data, and it proposes an approach to estimate the tensile strength for concrete-driven piles. A case study of the effects of pile failures on the tensile strength is also presented to verify the approach. The obtained tensile strength from the proposed approach agrees well with the measured field data. For the case study, the pile tensile strength obtained using the proposed approach is 38% and 59% higher than the tensile strength obtained using AASHTO 2014. These quantities are significant but may vary, depending on the compression strength of the concrete used and the pile configurations. The proposed approach better predicts the tensile strength of concrete piles and can lead to cost savings.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Vietnam Institute for Building Science and Technology, 81 Tran Cung, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX 78539, USA

Newcastle Australia Institute of Higher Education, Singapore 188064, Singapore

Department of Civil Environmental Engineering, Saitama University, Sakura-ku, Saitama 338-8570, Japan

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Likins, G., and Rausche, F. (2014). Pile Damage Prevention and Assessment Using Dynamic Monitoring and the Beta Method, Soil Behavior Fundamentals to Innovations in Geotechnical Engineering, Proceeding of the Geo-Congress.10.1061/9780784413265.034 ↗
2. Lowery, L.L., Hirsch, T.J., Edwards, T.C., Coyle, H.M., and Samson, C.H. (1970). Chapter VIII—Prediction of driving stress, Pile-Driving Analysis by One-Dimensional Wave Theory: State of the Art.
3. Hirsch, T.J., and Samson, C.H. (1966). Driving practices for pre-stressed concrete piles, Research Report Number 33-3-Piling Behavior.
4. Davisson, M.T., Manuel, F.S., and Amstrong, R.M. (1983). Chapter 5: Piles containing concrete. Allowable Stresses in Piles, Federal Highway Administration Bulletin.
5. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2014). Section 10: Foundation. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. [7th ed.].
6. Section 8.6 Concrete piles
7. ACI Committee 318 (2008). Chapter 22—Sectional strength, Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI 318-2002).
8. (2003). Design of Concrete Structures for Retaining Aqueous Liquids. Standard No. BS 8007.
9. (2004). Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures—General Rules and Rules for Buildings. Standard No. EN 1992-1-1.
10. JCI (2017). Chapter 4—Verification of Cracking due to Heat or Hydration of Cement. Guidelines for Control of Cracking of Mass Concrete 2016, Japan Concrete Institute.
11. Japan Society of Civil Engineers (2010). Section 4—Material Properties. JSCE Guidelines for Concrete No.15 “Standard Specifications for Concrete Structures–Design”, JSCE.
12. AIJ (2008). Recommendations for Practice of Thermal Cracking Control of Massive Concrete in Building, Architectural Institute of Japan.
13. Canadian Standards Association (2007). Design of Concrete Structures CAN/CSA-A23.3-04, Standards Council of Canada.
14. Standards New Zealand (2006). The Design of Concrete Structures and Commentary—NZS 3101 Parts 1 and 2*.
15. (2007). Plain and Reinforced Concrete Code of Practice—4th Revision. Standard No. IS 456:2000.
16. FIB Special Activity Group 5 (2010). Chapter 5—Materials. Model Code 2010, The International Federation for Structural Concrete (FIB).
17. Научнo-исследoвательским, прoектнo-кoнструктoрским и технoлoгическим институтoм бетoна и железoбетoна “НИИЖБ” (2018). Section 7—Прoведение испытаний. ГОСТ 10180—Бетoны. Метoды Определения Прoчнoсти пo Кoнтрoльным Образцам, Kodeks JSC.
18. (1993). Hardened Concrete–Test Method for Flexural Tensile Strength. Standard No. TCVN 3119.
19. (1993). Heavyweight Concrete—Method for Determination of Direct Tensile Strength. Standard No. TCVN 3120.
20. Vietnamese Mynistry of Construction (2012). Section 5: Materials for plain concrete and reinforcement concrete. TCVN 5574—Concrete and Reinforced Concrete Structure—Design Standard, Directorate for Standards, Metrology and Quality.
21. (2012). Guide to Design, Manufacture, and Installation of Concrete Piles. Standard No. ACI 543R-12.
22. Rozalija, K., and David, D. (1997). Chapter 3 Results. Effects of Aggregate Type, Size, and Content on Concrete Strength and Fracture Energy, University of Kansas Center for Research, Inc.
23. Tuchscherer; Oguzhan Bayrak. Allowable Tensile Stress Limit at Prestressed Transfer
24. Tensile Strength of Concrete
25. Structural Properties of High-Strength Concrete and Its Implications for Precast Pre-Stressed Concrete
26. Driving stresses in concrete piles10.15554/pcij.01011976.70.88 ↗
27. Construction Control and Pile Body Tensile Stresses Distribution Pattern during Driving10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:9(1102) ↗