Numerical Investigation of the Hydrodynamic Characteristics of 3-Fin Surfboard Configurations
Source abstract
Abstract
Surfing is a popular sport, with the associated market forecast to reach 2.6 billion US dollars by 2027. In the published literature, there is a range of investigations into the performance of surfboard fins. Some studies model a single fin or review the performance of different fin layouts and surface designs. However, the effects of individual fin design features on flow dynamics are not well understood. This study provides numerical analysis into the thruster fin aspects (rake, depth, and base length) and resultant key performance indicators (i) lift and drag coefficients, and (ii) turbulent kinetic energy. The models were simulated in Ansys Fluent R19.1, solving steady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations using the SST k−ω turbulence model at a velocity of 7 m/s. The results indicate the performance of fins varies more post-stall. The variations in rake showed the biggest impact on the turbulence intensity at an angle ≥20°. The variations in base length exhibited coefficient trends with greater lift at small angles but significant lift losses at high angles of attack. The variations in depth affected the forces on the fins rather than the performance indicators. Based on these simulations, a proposed fin set was developed that presented the lowest lift losses after the stall point.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aerospace Engineering and Energy Systems · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong 3216, Australia
Centre for Sport Research, Deakin University, Geelong 3216, Australia
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. CFD modeling of the effect of fillets on fin drag
2. El-Atm, B., Kelson, N., and Gudimetla, P. (2008, January 12–14). A finite element analysis of the hydrodynamic performance of 3- and 4- fin surfboard configurations. Proceedings of the 9th Global Congress on Manufacturing & Management, Gold Coast, Australia.
3. Computational hydrodynamics of a typical 3-fin surfboard setup10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.07.006 ↗
4. Falk, S., Kniesburges, S., Janka, R., O’Keefe, T., Grosso, R., and Döllinger, M. (2020). Numerical Investigation of the Hydrodynamics of Changing Fin Positions within a 4-Fin Surfboard Configuration. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10030816 ↗
5. MacNeill, M.S. (2015). Bio-Inspired Optimal fin Shape and Angle for Maximum Surfboard Stability. [Master’s Thesis, Michigan Technological University, Civil and Environmental Engineering Commons].
6. Brandner, P.A., and Walker, G.J. (2004, January 13–17). Hydrodynamic performance of a surfboard fin. Proceedings of the 15th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, Sydney, Australia.
7. Optimisation of the surfboard fin shape using computational fluid dynamics and genetic algorithms
8. FCS Fin Data (2020, October 06). Fin Control Systems. Available online: https://www.surffcs.com.au/pages/fcs-fin-data.
9. Additive Manufacturing, Modeling and Performance Evaluation of 3D Printed Fins for Surfboards10.1557/adv.2017.107 ↗
10. Forbes, S.M., and Sweeney, B. (2007). Global Surfaris, Running Press Book Publishers.
11. Glauert, H. (1983). The Elements of Aerofoil and Airscrew Theory, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511574481 ↗
12. Oggiano, L. (2017, January 30–31). Numerical Comparison between a Modern Surfboard and an Alaia Board using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD). Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support, Funchal, Portugal.10.5220/0006488400750082 ↗
13. Oggiano, L., and Pierella, F. (2018). CFD for Surfboards: Comparison between Three Different Designs in Static and Maneuvering Conditions. Proceedings, 2.10.3390/proceedings2060309 ↗
14. Ngo, C., and Gramoll, K. (2021, March 25). Boundary Layer Theory-Flow Past a Flat Plate. Multimedia Engineering Fluid Mechanics. Available online: https://ecourses.ou.edu/cgi-bin/eBook.cgi?topic=fl&chap_sec=09.3&page=theory.
15. Richardson Extrapolation-Based Discretization Uncertainty Estimation for Computational Fluid Dynamics10.1115/1.4027353 ↗
16. Quantification of Uncertainty in Computational Fluid Dynamics10.1146/annurev.fluid.29.1.123 ↗
17. Shormann, D., Oggiano, L., and Panhuis, M.I.H. (2020). Numerical CFD Investigation of Shortboard Surfing: Fin Design vs. Cutback Turn Performance. Proceedings, 49.10.3390/proceedings2020049132 ↗
18. Field Research and Numerical CFD Analysis of Humpback Whale-Inspired Shortboard Fins