Wearable Sensory Apparatus for Real-Time Feedback in Wearable Robotics
Source abstract
Abstract
We describe the Wearable Sensory Apparatus (WSA) System, which has been implemented and verified in accordance with the relevant standards. It comprises the Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs), real-time wireless data transmission over Ultrawideband (UWB), a Master Unit and several IMU dongles forming the Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN). The WSA is designed for, but is not restricted to, wearable robots. The paper focuses on the topology of the communication network, the WSA hardware, and the organization of the WSA firmware. The experimental evaluation of the WSA incorporates the confirmation of the timing using the supply current WSA profile, measurements related to determining the less error prone position of the master device on the backpack, measurements of the quality of the data transfer in a real environment scenario, measurements in the presence of other microwave signals, and an example of raw IMU signals during human walking. Placement of the master device on the top of the backpack was found to be less error prone, with less than 0.02% packet loss for all the IMU devices placed on different body segments. The packet loss did not change significantly in public buildings or on the street. There was no impact of Wi-Fi bands on the WSA data transfer. The WSA hardware and firmware passed conformance testing in a certified lab. Most importantly, the WSA performed reliably in the laboratory and in clinical tests with exoskeletons and prostheses.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Wireless Body Area Networks · Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems · Energy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
Funding
European Commission · Slovenian research agency
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. The Exoskeleton Expansion: Improving Walking and Running Economy10.1186/s12984-020-00663-9 ↗
2. Lower Limb Wearable Robots for Assistance and Rehabilitation: A State of the Art10.1109/JSYST.2014.2351491 ↗
3. Martinez-Hernandez, U., Metcalfe, B., Assaf, T., Jabban, L., Male, J., and Zhang, D. (2021). Wearable Assistive Robotics: A Perspective on Current Challenges and Future Trends. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21206751 ↗
4. A Survey of Sensor Fusion Methods in Wearable Robotics10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.012 ↗
5. Sensing beyond Itself: Multi-Functional Use of Ubiquitous Signals towards Wearable Applications10.1016/j.dsp.2021.103091 ↗
6. Research Progress of Flexible Wearable Pressure Sensors10.1016/j.sna.2021.112838 ↗
7. Prasanth, H., Caban, M., Keller, U., Courtine, G., Ijspeert, A., Vallery, H., and von Zitzewitz, J. (2021). Wearable Sensor-Based Real-Time Gait Detection: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21082727 ↗
8. Utilization of Wearable Technology to Assess Gait and Mobility Post-Stroke: A Systematic Review10.1186/s12984-021-00863-x ↗
9. CYBERLEGs: A User-Oriented Robotic Transfemoral Prosthesis with Whole-Body Awareness Control10.1109/MRA.2014.2360278 ↗
10. Online Phase Detection Using Wearable Sensors for Walking with a Robotic Prosthesis10.3390/s140202776 ↗
11. Wearable Sensors for Monitoring Human Motion: A Review on Mechanisms, Materials, and Challenges
12. Real-Time Hybrid Locomotion Mode Recognition for Lower Limb Wearable Robots10.1109/TMECH.2017.2755048 ↗
13. The Challenges and Achievements of Experimental Implementation of an Active Transfemoral Prosthesis Based on Biological Quasi-Stiffness: The CYBERLEGs Beta-Prosthesis10.3389/fnbot.2018.00080 ↗
14. Perry, J., and Burnfield, J.M. (2010). Gait Analysis: Normal and Pathological Function, SLACK. [2nd ed.].
15. Trew, M., and Everett, T. (2005). Human Movement: An Introductory Text, Churchill Livingstone. [5th ed.].
16. Analysis of Standing up and Sitting down in Humans: Definitions and Normative Data Presentation10.1016/0021-9290(90)90005-N ↗
17. The Use of Accelerometry to Detect Heel Contact Events for Use as a Sensor in FES Assisted Walking10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00116-4 ↗
18. Clinical Application of Acceleration Sensor to Detect the Swing Phase of Stroke Gait in Functional Electrical Stimulation10.1620/tjem.207.197 ↗
19. Assessment of Walking Features From Foot Inertial Sensing10.1109/TBME.2004.840727 ↗
20. Stair Climbing Detection during Daily Physical Activity Using a Miniature Gyroscope10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.08.008 ↗
21. Gait Event Detection Using Linear Accelerometers or Angular Velocity Transducers in Able-Bodied and Spinal-Cord Injured Individuals10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.12.017 ↗
22. A Reliable Gyroscope-Based Gait-Phase Detection Sensor Embedded in a Shoe Insole10.1109/JSEN.2004.823671 ↗
23. A Practical Gait Analysis System Using Gyroscopes10.1016/S1350-4533(99)00030-2 ↗
24. Novel Approach to Ambulatory Assessment of Human Segmental Orientation on a Wearable Sensor System10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.008 ↗
25. Djuric, M. (2008, January 25–27). Automatic Recognition of Gait Phases from Accelerations of Leg Segments. Proceedings of the 2008 9th Symposium on Neural Network Applications in Electrical Engineering, Belgrade, Serbia.10.1109/NEUREL.2008.4685586 ↗
26. Lower Extremity Angle Measurement with Accelerometers-Error and Sensitivity Analysis10.1109/10.137284 ↗
27. An Inertial and Magnetic Sensor Based Technique for Joint Angle Measurement10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.12.010 ↗
28. Gait Event Detection for FES Using Accelerometers and Supervised Machine Learning10.1109/86.867873 ↗
29. Accelerometer and Rate Gyroscope Measurement of Kinematics: An Inexpensive Alternative to Optical Motion Analysis Systems10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00231-7 ↗
30. Accelerometry—A Technique for the Measurement of Human Body Movements10.1016/0021-9290(73)90029-8 ↗
31. An Ambulatory System for Gait Monitoring Based on Wireless Sensorized Insoles10.3390/s150716589 ↗
32. Body Area Sensor Networks: Challenges and Opportunities10.1109/MC.2009.5 ↗
33. Yuan, K., Parri, A., Yan, T., Wang, L., Munih, M., Vitiello, N., and Wang, Q. (2015, January 25–29). Fuzzy-Logic-Based Hybrid Locomotion Mode Classification for an Active Pelvis Orthosis: Preliminary Results. Proceedings of the 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Milan, Italy.
34. A Classification Approach Based on Directed Acyclic Graph to Predict Locomotion Activities With One Inertial Sensor on the Thigh10.1109/TMRB.2021.3075096 ↗
35. Borodacz, K., Szczepański, C., and Popowski, S. (2021). Review and Selection of Commercially Available IMU for a Short Time Inertial Navigation. Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., ahead-of-print.10.1108/AEAT-12-2020-0308 ↗
36. Propagation Models for Body-Area Networks: A Survey and New Outlook10.1109/MAP.2013.6735479 ↗
37. Wearable Ultrawideband Technology—A Review of Ultrawideband Antennas, Propagation Channels, and Applications in Wireless Body Area Networks10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2861704 ↗
38. Reich, O., Hubner, E., Ghita, B., Wagner, M.F., and Schafer, J. (2020, January 13–15). A Survey Investigating the Combination and Number of IMUs on the Human Body Used for Detecting Activities and Human Tracking. Proceedings of the 2020 World Conference on Computing and Communication Technologies (WCCCT), Warsaw, Poland.10.1109/WCCCT49810.2020.9170009 ↗
39. Alani, S., Zakaria, Z., Saeidi, T., Ahmad, A., Mahmood, S.N., Saad, M.A., Rashid, S.A., Hamdi, M.M., and Albeyar, M.A.A.A. (2020, January 22–24). A Review on UWB Antenna Sensor for Wireless Body Area Networks. Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT), Istanbul, Turkey.10.1109/ISMSIT50672.2020.9254219 ↗
40. A Review of IEEE 802.15.6 MAC, PHY, and Security Specifications10.1155/2013/950704 ↗
41. Klingbeil, L., Wark, T., and Bidargaddi, N. (2007, January 3–6). Efficient Transfer of Human Motion Data over a Wireless Delay Tolerant Network. Proceedings of the 2007 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information, Melbourne, Australia.10.1109/ISSNIP.2007.4496908 ↗
42. Madgwick, S.O.H., Harrison, A.J.L., and Vaidyanathan, R. (July, January 29). Estimation of IMU and MARG Orientation Using a Gradient Descent Algorithm. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Zurich, Switzerland.10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975346 ↗
43. IMU-Based Joint Angle Measurement for Gait Analysis10.3390/s140406891 ↗
44. A Review on Accelerometry-Based Gait Analysis and Emerging Clinical Applications10.1109/RBME.2018.2807182 ↗
45. Ancillao, A., Tedesco, S., Barton, J., and O’Flynn, B. (2018). Indirect Measurement of Ground Reaction Forces and Moments by Means of Wearable Inertial Sensors: A Systematic Review. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18082564 ↗
46. Estimation of Joint Forces and Moments for the In-Run and Take-Off in Ski Jumping Based on Measurements with Wearable Inertial Sensors10.3390/s150511258 ↗