journal article·2021-10-15Open access

A Proposal for a Simple Method for Determining the Concrete Slab Width of Composite Beam-to-Column Joints

Linfeng Lu, Di Wang, Kai Ding, Hongwei Yan, Hanlin Hao

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 20

Abstract

Extensive brittle failures in the weld zone of the beam bottom flange in composite joints of SMRFs were observed during the Northridge earthquake and the Kobe earthquake. One of the main reasons is the large tensile strain demand generated at the beam bottom flange zone under positive bending. The key to accurately understanding the mechanical properties of composite joints is the effective width of the slab. However, researchers have no consensus on the flange slab’s effective width for composite joints, even with the simplest solid concrete slab. Therefore, the best way to design the composite joint specimen is by following the current design specifications. However, each specification implements different ideas and approaches for specifying an effective slab width. This paper presents comparisons of the effective flange width provisions in China, the United States, Australia/New Zealand, and the European Union. The characteristics of each provision are briefly described and summarized. Numerical comparisons for positive and negative moment regions of continuous spans follow. Based on the commonalities and main differences among all these provisions, we propose a recommended equation for calculating the effective width of a solid concrete slab, reflecting the specification differences. The reliability of the recommended equation was verified with ABAQUS software analysis. The recommended equation can meet the fast and secure design requirements for composite joints in tests with concrete slabs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, 75 Chang’an Middle Rd, Xi’an 710062, China

China Construction Third Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Mai Hua Rd., Nanjing 210004, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Probabilistic assessment of connections for steel buildings on seismic zones10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.04.003 ↗
2. Performance of steel moment resisting frames with RBS connections under fire loading10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.05.040 ↗
3. Double reduced beam section connection10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.07.013 ↗
4. Seismic behavior and retrofit of steel moment connections considering slab effects10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.017 ↗
5. Behavior of composite substructures with full and partial shear connection under quasi-static cyclic and pseudo-dynamic displacements10.1007/BF02479409 ↗
6. Non-linear analysis of steel-concrete composite frames with full and partial shear connection subjected to seismic loads10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.06.002 ↗
7. Du Plessis, D.P., and Daniels, J.H. (1973). Strength of Composite Beam to Column Connections, Lehigh University. Fritz Laboratory Reports.
8. Cyclic tests of full-scale composite joint subassemblages10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:8(1977) ↗
9. Cyclic testing of steel moment connections rehabilitated with RBS or welded haunch10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(57) ↗
10. Effect of composite action on seismic performance of steel moment connections with reduced beam sections10.1016/S0143-974X(00)00022-5 ↗
11. Full-scale test of composite frame under large cyclic loading10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:2(297) ↗
12. EN 1994-1-1:2004 (2009). Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (Incorporating Corrigendum April 2009), The European Union Per Regulation.
13. AS/NZS 2327:2017 (2017). Composite Structures—Composite Steel-Concrete Construction in Buildings, Joint Technical Committee BD-032, Composite Construction.
14. Simplified method for the determination of the effective width due to shear lag effects10.1016/0143-974X(93)90042-Q ↗
15. Time-dependent analysis of shear-lag effect in composite beams10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:1(71) ↗
16. Influence of the flanges width and thickness on the shear strength of reinforced concrete beams with T-shaped cross section10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.03.057 ↗
17. The Effective Width in Shear Design of Wide-shallow Beams: A Comparative Study10.1007/s12205-019-0830-7 ↗
18. Effective flange width provisions for composite steel bridges10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.009 ↗
19. Slab spatial composite effect in composite frame systems. I: Effective width for ultimate loading capacity10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.034 ↗
20. Numerical evaluation for the effective slab width of steel-concrete composite beams10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.05.015 ↗
21. Effective Flange Width for Composite Steel Beams
22. The Effective Width in Composite Steel Concrete Beams at Ultimate Loads10.31026/j.eng.2014.08.01 ↗
23. Effects of Web Openings on the Effective Slab Widths in Composite Steel Beams10.7763/IJET.2016.V8.849 ↗
24. GB50017-2017 (2017). Standard for Design of Steel Structures, China Plan Press.
25. ANSI/AISC 341-16 (2018). Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (Revised June 2018), American Institute of Steel Construction.
26. ANSI/AISC 360-16 (2019). Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (Revised June 2019), American Institute of Steel Construction.
27. AISC-LRFD (1999). Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction.
28. Experimental evaluation of effective width in steel-concrete composite beams10.1016/j.jcsr.2003.08.007 ↗
29. Slab effects in SMRF retrofit connection tests10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:3(230) ↗
30. Behavior of composite beams in steel frame under hysteretic loading10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:8(2029) ↗
31. Cyclic response and design procedure of a weak-axis cover-plate moment connection
32. Finite element analysis of weak-axis composite connections under cyclic loading10.1007/s13296-018-0091-1 ↗
33. Investigation of composite action on seismic performance of weak-axis column bending connections10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.11.019 ↗
34. Mechanical performance of a new I-section weak-axis column bending connection
35. Effective width of steel-concrete composite beam at ultimate strength state10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.027 ↗
36. GB50011-2010 (2010). Code for Seismic Design of Buildings, China Architecture and Building Press.
37. Effective width evaluation for steel-concrete composite beams10.1016/S0143-974X(01)00058-X ↗
38. GB 50017-2003 (2003). Code for Design of Steel Structure, China Plan Press.