Comparison of Dynamic Characteristics between Small and Super-Large Diameter Cross-River Twin Tunnels under Train Vibration
Source abstract
Abstract
Train vibration from closely aligned adjacent tunnels could cause safety concerns, especially given the soaring size of the tunnel diameter. This paper established a two-dimensional discrete element model (DEM) of small (d = 6.2 m) and super-large (D = 15.2 m) diameter cross-river twin tunnels and discussed the dynamic characteristics of adjacent tunnels during the vibration of a train that runs through the tunnel at a speed of 120 km/h. Results in the D tunnel showed that the horizontal walls have the same horizontal displacement (DH) and the vertical walls have the same vertical displacement (DV). The stress state of the surroundings of the D tunnel is the decisive factor for DH, and the distance from the vibration point to the measurement point is the decisive factor for DV. Results in the comparison of the d and D tunnels showed that the D tunnel is more stable than the d tunnel with respect to two aspects: the time the tunnel reaches the equilibrium state and the vibration amplitude of the structure’s dynamic and static responses. The dynamic characteristic of the d and D tunnel is significantly different. This research is expected to guide the design and construction of large diameter twin tunnels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Railway Engineering and Dynamics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Civil and Geotechnical Engineering Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430063, China
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong 723001, China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Discrete element modeling of a cross-river tunnel under subway train operation during peak and off-peak periods10.1007/s12517-019-4279-2 ↗
2. Li, S., Li, P., Zhang, M., and Liu, Y. (2020). Influence of Approaching Excavation on Adjacent Segments for Twin Tunnels. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10010098 ↗
3. Dynamic characteristics of adjacent tunnel and surroundings under the vibration of trains in the first tunnel with different buried depths10.1007/s13369-020-05246-3 ↗
4. Analysis of ground surface settlement induced by the construction of a large-diameter shield-driven tunnel in Shanghai, China10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.008 ↗
5. Evaluation of twin tunnel-induced surface ground deformation by empirical and numerical analyses (NATM part of Eurasia tunnel, Turkey)10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103367 ↗
6. Displacement monitoring, displacement verification and stability assessment of the critical sections of the Konak tunnel, İzmir, Turkey10.1016/j.tust.2020.103357 ↗
7. Face stability analysis of large-diameter slurry shield-driven tunnels with linearly increasing undrained strength10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.018 ↗
8. Reliability assessment on stability of tunnelling perpendicularly beneath an existing tunnel considering spatial variabilities of rock mass properties10.1016/j.tust.2019.03.013 ↗
9. Shaking table tests on discrepant responses of shaft-tunnel junction in soft soil under transverse excitations10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.02.013 ↗
10. Inelastic dynamic analysis and damage assessment of a hydraulic arched tunnel under near-fault SV waves with arbitrary incoming angles10.1016/j.tust.2020.103523 ↗
11. A numerical study on the transverse seismic response of lined circular tunnels under obliquely incident asynchronous P and SV waves10.1016/j.tust.2019.103235 ↗
12. Dynamic response and long-term settlement of a metro tunnel in saturated clay due to moving train load10.1016/j.sandf.2017.08.031 ↗
13. Comparative study of 2D and 2.5D responses of long underground tunnels to moving train loads10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.02.005 ↗
14. A 2.5-D coupled FE–BE model for the dynamic interaction between saturated soil and longitudinally invariant structures10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.10.005 ↗
15. Analytical method for calculation of ground vibration from a tunnel embedded in a multi-layered half-space10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.03.009 ↗
16. An experimental study of ground-borne vibration from shield tunnels10.1016/j.tust.2017.08.020 ↗
17. The effect of cross-sectional shape on the dynamic response of tunnels under train induced vibration loads10.1016/j.tust.2019.05.006 ↗
18. Discrete element analysis of a cross-river tunnel under random vibration levels induced by trains operating during the flood season10.1631/jzus.A1700002 ↗
19. Prediction of vibrations from underground trains on Beijing metro line 1510.1007/s11771-010-0604-3 ↗
20. Dynamic Characteristic and Fatigue Accumulative Damage of a Cross Shield Tunnel Structure under Vibration Load10.1155/2018/9525680 ↗
21. Dynamic Response of Segment Lining of Overlapped Shield Tunnels Under Train-Induced Vibration Loads10.1007/s13369-018-3147-9 ↗
22. Study of the Influence of Train Vibration Loading on Adjacent Damaged Tunnel10.1155/2019/3417598 ↗
23. Modelling of ground vibration from tunnels in a poroelastic half-space using a 2.5-D FE-BE formulation10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.043 ↗
24. Analytical model for vibration prediction of two parallel tunnels in a full-space10.1016/j.jsv.2018.02.050 ↗
25. Modeling of Vehicle-Track-Tunnel-Soil System Considering the Dynamic Interaction between Twin Tunnels in a Poroelastic Half-Space10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001538 ↗
26. Cyber-physical-system-based safety monitoring for blind hoisting with the internet of things: A case study10.1016/j.autcon.2018.10.017 ↗
27. Dynamic characteristics of track-ballast-silty clay with irregular vibration levels generated by high-speed train based on DEM10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.079 ↗
28. 3D Discrete Element Method Modelling of Tunnel Construction Impact on an Adjacent Tunnel10.1007/s12205-020-2054-2 ↗
29. Itasca (2004). Particle Flow Code in 2 Dimensions (PFC2D). User’s Guide, Itasca Consulting Group.
30. Discrete Numerical Model for Analysis of Earth Pressure Balance Tunnel Excavation10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:10(1234) ↗