journal article·2020-08-22Open access

Bayesian Calibration of Hysteretic Parameters with Consideration of the Model Discrepancy for Use in Seismic Structural Health Monitoring

Rosario Ceravolo, Alessio Faraci, Gaetano Miraglia

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 17

Abstract

Bayesian model calibration techniques are commonly employed in the characterization of nonlinear dynamic systems, as they provide a conceptual and effective framework to deal with model uncertainties, experimental errors and procedure assumptions. This understanding has resulted in the need to introduce a model discrepancy term to account for the differences between model-based predictions and real observations. Indeed, the goal of this work is to investigate model-driven seismic structural health monitoring procedures based on a Bayesian uncertainty quantification framework, and thus make relevant considerations for its use in the seismic structural health monitoring, focusing on masonry structures. Specifically, the Bayesian inference has been applied to the calibration of nonlinear hysteretic systems to both provide: (i) most probable values (MPV) of the parameters following the calibration; and (ii) estimates of the model discrepancy posterior distribution. The effect of the model discrepancy in the calibration is first illustrated recurring to a single degree of freedom using a Bouc–Wen type oscillator as a numerical benchmark. The model discrepancy is then introduced for calibrating a reference nonlinear Bouc–Wen model derived from real data acquired on a monitored masonry building. The main novelty of this study is the application of the framework of uncertainty quantification on models representing data measured directly on masonry structures during seismic events.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Politecnico di Torino, Department of Structural, Geotechnical and Building Engineering & Responsible Risk Resilience interdepartmental Centre, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24-10129 Turin, Italy

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Biegler, L., Biros, G., Ghattas, O., Heinkenschloss, M., Keyes, D., Mallick, B., Tenorio, L., van Bloemen Waanders, B., Willcox, K., and Marzouk, Y. (2011). Large-Scale Inverse Problems and Quantification of Uncertainty, Wiley Online Library.10.1002/9780470685853 ↗
2. Output-only damage detection in buildings using proportional modal flexibility-based deflections in unknown mass scenarios10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.036 ↗
3. Seismic behaviour and failure-mode-prediction method of a reinforced-concrete rigid-frame bridge with thin-walled tall piers: Investigation by model-updating hybrid test10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110302 ↗
4. Moon, F., and Catbas, N. (2013). Structural Identification of Constructed Systems: Approaches, Methods, and Technologies for Effective Practice of St-Id, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).10.1061/9780784411971.ch01 ↗
5. Updating Models and Their Uncertainties. I: Bayesian Statistical Framework10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1998)124:4(455) ↗
6. Wagner, P.-R., Nagel, J., Marelli, S., and Sudret, B. (2019). UQLab User Manual—Bayesian Inversion for Model Calibration and Validation, Chair of Risk, Safety and Uncertainty Quantification.
7. Nonlinear system identification in structural dynamics: 10 more years of progress10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.07.020 ↗
8. Bayesian state and parameter estimation of uncertain dynamical systems10.1016/j.probengmech.2005.08.003 ↗
9. Identification of Bouc–Wen type models using the Transitional Markov Chain Monte Carlo method10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.10.012 ↗
10. Reliability analysis and optimum maintenance of coastal flood defences using probabilistic deterioration modelling10.1016/j.ress.2018.12.021 ↗
11. An offline approach for output-only Bayesian identification of stochastic nonlinear systems using unscented Kalman filtering10.1016/j.jsv.2017.03.001 ↗
12. Uncertainty quantification in structural dynamic analysis using two-level Gaussian processes and Bayesian inference10.1016/j.jsv.2017.09.034 ↗
13. A non-negative Bayesian learning method for impact force reconstruction10.1016/j.jsv.2019.06.013 ↗
14. Bayesian inference for damage identification based on analytical probabilistic model of scattering coefficient estimators and ultrafast wave scattering simulation scheme10.1016/j.jsv.2019.115083 ↗
15. Robust uncertainty quantification in structural dynamics under scarse experimental modal data: A Bayesian-interval approach10.1016/j.jsv.2019.114983 ↗
16. A two-stage Bayesian algorithm for finite element model updating by using ambient response data from multiple measurement setups10.1016/j.jsv.2019.115139 ↗
17. Bayesian Updating and Model Class Selection for Hysteretic Structural Models Using Stochastic Simulation10.1177/1077546307079400 ↗
18. Application of the unscented Kalman filter for real-time nonlinear structural system identification10.1002/stc.186 ↗
19. Material Parameter Identification in Distributed Plasticity FE Models of Frame-Type Structures Using Nonlinear Stochastic Filtering10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000851 ↗
20. Conte, J., Astroza, R., and Ebrahimian, H. (2015, January 19–21). Bayesian Methods for Nonlinear System Identification of Civil Structures. Proceedings of the MATEC Web Conference, Zürich, Switzerland.10.1051/matecconf/20152403002 ↗
21. Structural modeling uncertainties and their influence on seismic assessment of existing RC structures10.1016/j.strusafe.2010.02.004 ↗
22. Probabilistic Capacity Models and Fragility Estimates for Reinforced Concrete Columns based on Experimental Observations10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1024) ↗
23. Seismic assessment of masonry buildings accounting for limited knowledgeon material by Bayesian updating10.1007/s10518-016-9905-8 ↗
24. A Bayesian approach for NDT data fusion: The Saint Torcato church case study10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.015 ↗
25. Bayesian model updating of historic masonry towers through dynamic experimental data10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.267 ↗
26. Osservatorio sismico delle strutture: The Italian structural seismic monitoring network10.1007/s10518-015-9738-x ↗
27. Marelli, S., and Sudret, B. (2014). UQLab: A Framework for Uncertainty Quantification in Matlab. Vulnerability Uncertain. Risk, 2554–2563.10.1061/9780784413609.257 ↗
28. Goodman, J., and Weare, J. (2010). Communications in Applied Mathematics and Computational Science, Math. Sci. Publishing.
29. Identification Of Hysteretic Systems Using The Differential Evolution Algorithm10.1006/jsvi.2001.3798 ↗
30. Parameter estimation and model selection for a class of hysteretic systems using Bayesian inference10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.03.019 ↗
31. Model selection and parameter estimation in structural dynamics using approximate Bayesian computation10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.06.017 ↗
32. Instantaneous Identification of Degrading Hysteretic Oscillators Under Earthquake Excitation10.1177/1475921710368202 ↗
33. Instantaneous Identification of Bouc-Wen-Type Hysteretic Systems from Seismic Response Data10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.347.331 ↗
34. Ceravolo, R., Demarie, G.V., and Erlicher, S. (2008, January 20–22). Identification of degrading hysteretic systems from seismic response data. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2008, Leuven, Belgium.
35. Modèle mathématique d’hystérésis: Application aux systèmes à un degré de liberté
36. Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems10.1061/JMCEA3.0002106 ↗
37. Random Vibration of Degrading, Pinching Systems10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:8(1010) ↗
38. Parameter Analysis of the Differential Model of Hysteresis10.1115/1.1668082 ↗
39. Bouc–Wen-Type Models with Stiffness Degradation: Thermodynamic Analysis and Applications10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:10(843) ↗
40. Ikhouane, F., and Rodellar, J. (2007). Systems with Hysteresis, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9780470513200 ↗
41. Identification of the hysteretic behaviour of a partial-strength steel-concrete moment-resisting frame structure subject to pseudodynamic tests10.1002/eqe.2163 ↗
42. Comparison of restoring force models for the identification of structures with hysteresis and degradation10.1016/j.jsv.2013.08.019 ↗
43. Seismic damage identification by fitting the nonlinear and hysteretic dynamic response of monitored buildings10.1007/s13349-020-00394-4 ↗
44. Discussion on data recorded by the italian structural seismic monitoring network on three masonry structures hit by the 2016-2017 central italy earthquake
45. A damage index of generalised applicability10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.02.014 ↗
46. On a statistical damage constitutive model for rock materials10.1016/j.cageo.2010.05.018 ↗