journal article·2020-12-22Open access

Why Farmers Get Involved in Participatory Research Projects? The Case of Arable Crops Farmers in Greece

George Vlontzos, Spyros Niavis, Christina Kleisiari, Leonidas Sotirios Kyrgiakos, Christos Athanassiou, Panos Pardalos

Applied Sciences· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

This paper seeks to underline the driving factors of farmers’ engagement in Participatory Research Projects (PRPs). This is a critical issue for formulating efficient and effective technology transfer channels, essential for improving the operational status of agricultural holdings. A survey was conducted on a sample of 326 Greek arable crops farmers. An explanatory framework consisting of three major factor categories and 11 variables was developed. A logistic regression analysis empirically tests the effect of the variables on the participation of farmers in PRP. Furthermore, the relative importance of variables and factors is extracted with the Shapley–Owen decomposition analysis. The results show that Farmers’ Willingness and Social Influences are the factors that mostly affect their decision to engage in a PRP. The farmers’ ability consisting of socioeconomic and demographic variables has a small effect on their decision-making process. The estimated effects can help decision-makers to shape and prioritize more targeted policies for farmers’ engagement in research. Additionally, this paper sets the basis for shifting research from simple estimations of the effect of variables on farmers’ decision-making, to a more comprehensive estimation that also accounts for the strength of these relationships. The paper fills a gap in the literature of studies on farmers’ decisions for participating in PRPs, by developing and testing an explanatory framework which also accounts for the relative importance of each factor/variable.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Organic Food and Agriculture · Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Agriculture, Crop Production and Rural Development, University of Thessaly, 38446 Volos, Greece

Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly, 38221 Volos, Greece

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32603, USA

Funding

Greek General Secretariat for Research and Technology

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2014). Building a Common Vision for Sustainable Food and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3940e.pdf.
2. Niavis, S., and Vlontzos, G. (2019). Seeking for Convergence in the Agricultural Sector Performance under the Changes of Uruguay Round and 1992 CAP Reform. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11154006 ↗
3. Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: A meta-analysis of the adoption literature10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.006 ↗
4. Socio-economic factors affecting adoption of modern information and communication technology by farmers in India: Analysis using multivariate probit model10.1080/1389224X.2014.997255 ↗
5. Education and training: Impacts on farm management practice10.1080/13892240008438811 ↗
6. Effects of farmers’ social networks on knowledge acquisition: Lessons from agricultural training in rural Indonesia10.1186/s40008-017-0069-8 ↗
7. How Farmers Learn: Implications for Agricultural Educators
8. Using educational theory and research to refine agricultural extension: Affordances and barriers for farmers’ learning and practice change10.1080/1389224X.2017.1314861 ↗
9. The evaluation of a participatory extension programme focused on climate friendly farming10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.03.010 ↗
10. Measuring the impact of user participation in agricultural and natural resource management research10.1016/S0308-521X(03)00130-6 ↗
11. Darnhofer, L., Gibbons, D., and Dedieu, B. (2012). Farming systems research: An approach to inquiry. Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic, Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2 ↗
12. Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: Experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal10.3152/030234210X496628 ↗
13. Farmer participation in research: A model for adaptive research and education10.1017/S0889189300004628 ↗
14. Designing better on-farm research in Australia using a participatory workshop process10.1016/j.fcr.2007.03.018 ↗
15. Turning farmers into conservationists? Progress and prospects10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00423.x ↗
16. Bartkowski, B., and Bartke, S. (2018). Leverage points for governing agricultural soils: A review of empirical studies of European Farmers’ decision-making. Sustainability, 10.10.3390/su10093179 ↗
17. The financing of extension services: A survey among rural youth in Greece10.1080/13892240902909098 ↗
18. Ulimwengu, J., and Sanyal, P. (2020, February 22). Joint Estimation of Farmers’ Stated Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Services, Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6237697.pdf.
19. Crop Farmers’ Willingness to Pay for Agricultural Extension Services in Bangladesh: Cases of Selected Villages in Two Important Agro-Ecological Zones10.1080/1389224X.2014.971826 ↗
20. Farmers’ participation in extension programs and technology adoption in rural Nepal: A logistic regression analysis10.1080/1389224X.2017.1323653 ↗
21. Understanding the motivation of farmers in financing agricultural research and extension in Benin
22. Farmers’ motivational orientation toward participation in competence development projects: A self-determination theory perspective10.1080/1389224X.2016.1261717 ↗
23. Drivers of Farmers’ Investments in Nutrient Abatement Technologies in Five Baltic Sea Countries10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.022 ↗
24. Factors affecting farmers’ participation in agri‐environmental measures: A Northern Italian perspective10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00134.x ↗
25. Factors affecting European farmers’ participation in biodiversity policies10.1111/j.1467-9523.2006.00420.x ↗
26. Investment behavior and status quo bias of conventional and organic hog farmers: An experimental approach10.1017/S1742170515000265 ↗
27. Axiomatic arguments for decomposing goodness of fit according to Shapley and Owen values10.1214/12-EJS710 ↗
28. Wendelspiess Chávez Juárez, F. (2015). SHAPLEY2: Stata Module to Compute Additive Decomposition of Estimation Statistics by Regressors or Groups of Regressors, Boston College Department of Economics. Available online: http://fmwww.bc.edu/repec/bocode/s/shapley2.ado.
29. The technology acceptance model and use of technology in New Zealand dairy farming10.1016/j.agsy.2003.08.002 ↗
30. Considering the source: Commercialisation and trust in agri-environmental information and advisory services in England10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.020 ↗
31. Investigating the influence of the institutional organisation of agri-environmental schemes on scheme adoption10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.004 ↗
32. Understanding the role of social capital in adoption decisions: An application to irrigation technology10.1016/j.agsy.2017.02.002 ↗
33. IoT adoption in agriculture: The role of trust, perceived value and risk10.1108/JBIM-01-2018-0023 ↗
34. Li, Q., Zeng, F., Mei, H., Li, T., and Li, D. (2019). Roles of Motivation, Opportunity, Ability, and Trust in the Willingness of Farmers to Adopt Green Fertilization Techniques. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11246902 ↗
35. Local institutions and farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.11.011 ↗
36. Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: A conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making10.1007/s10460-010-9272-z ↗
37. Shifting lands: Exploring Kansas farmer decision-making in an era of climate change and biofuels production10.1007/s00267-012-9991-6 ↗
38. Information transmission in irrigation technology adoption and diffusion: Social learning, extension services, and spatial effects10.1093/ajae/aat054 ↗
39. The influence of social networks on agricultural technology adoption10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.05.059 ↗
40. (2020, December 10). Greek Payment Authority of Common Agricultural Policy (C.A.P.) Aid Schemes. Available online: www.opkepe.gr.
41. Norusis, M. (2004). SPSS 13.0 Statistical Procedures Companion, Prentice Hall Publications.
42. IBM (2020, March 10). KMO and Bartlett’s Test. IBM: 2014. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLVMB_23.0.0/spss/tutorials/fac_telco_kmo_01.
43. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd ↗
44. Computing and evaluating factor scores10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.430 ↗
45. Hellenic Statistical Authority (2020, September 30). Available online: https://www.statistics.gr/el/statistics/agr.
46. Farmer training to simultaneously increase productivity of soybean and rice in Indonesia10.1108/IJPPM-10-2018-0367 ↗
47. Xu, W., Chen, C., Ding, S., and Pardalos, P. (2020). A bi-objective dynamic collaborative task assignment under uncertainty using modified MOEA/D with heuristic initialization. Expert Syst. Appl., 140.10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112844 ↗
48. A Review of Country Risk Assessment Approaches: New Empirical Evidence