journal article·2020-08-04Open access

Experimental Evaluation on the Effect of Electrode Configuration in Electrostatic Actuators for Increasing Vibrotactile Feedback Intensity

Taylor Mason, Jeong-Hoi Koo, Young-Min Kim, Tae-Heon Yang

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 15

Abstract

Vibrotactile feedback is a key feature of many modern touch displays, which greatly enhances user experiences when interacting with an onscreen interface. Despite its popularity in small touch screen devices, this haptic feature is absent in most large displays due to a lack of suitable actuators for such applications. Thus, a growing need exists for haptic actuators capable of producing sufficient vibrations in large touch displays. This study proposes and evaluates a novel electrostatic resonant actuator (ERA) with a moving mass and dual electrodes for increased vibration feedback intensity. The dual-electrode ERA was fabricated along with a comparable single-electrode ERA to investigate the effect of the electrode configuration on the maximum vibration intensity. When measured directly on the mass, the maximum vibration intensity of the dual-electrode actuator increased by 73% compared to the single-electrode actuator. When mounted and measured on a mock panel, the maximum vibration intensity of the dual-electrode actuator increased by nearly 65% compared to a similarly mounted single-electrode actuator. These results show that the dual-electrode configuration can significantly increase the vibration intensity when compared to the conventional ERA. This demonstrates a promising potential for the use of the proposed actuator for generating vibrotactile feedback in large touch displays.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Interactive and Immersive Displays · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA

Future Medicine Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, 1672, Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34054, Korea

Department of Electronic Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, 50, Daehak-ro, Chungju-si 27469, Korea

Funding

Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. Comparative Study of Various Touchscreen Technologies
2. Onishi, J., Sakajiri, M., Miura, T., and Ono, T. (2013, January 13–16). Fundamental Study on Tactile Cognition through Haptic Feedback Touchscreen. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Manchester, UK.10.1109/SMC.2013.717 ↗
3. Chittaro, L. (2003). Using Mobile Keypads with Limited Visual Feedback: Implications to Handheld and Wearable Devices. Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Springer Science and Business Media LLC.10.1007/b12029 ↗
4. Touch Screens and Touch Surfaces Are Enriched by Haptic Force-Feedback
5. Weddle, A.B., and Hua, Y. (2020, May 26). Confirmation Haptics for Automotive Interfaces Immersion—Haptic Technologies. Available online: www.immersion.com/.
6. Hoggan, E., Brewster, S., and Johnston, J. (2008, January 5–10). Investigating the Effectiveness of Tactile Feedback for Mobile Touchscreens. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Florence, Italy.10.1145/1357054.1357300 ↗
7. Hausberger, T., Terzer, M., Enneking, F., Jonas, Z., and Kim, Y. (2017, January 6–9). SurfTics-Kinesthetic and Tactile Feedback on a Touchscreen Device. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC), Munich, Germany.10.1109/WHC.2017.7989947 ↗
8. Automotive (2020, June 02). Immersion—Haptic Technology. Available online: https://www.immersion.com/automotive/.
9. Kaaresoja, T., Anttila, E., and Hoggan, E. (2011, January 21–24). The Effect of Tactile Feedback Latency in Touchscreen Interaction. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference, Istanbul, Turkey.10.1109/WHC.2011.5945463 ↗
10. Novel linear impact-resonant actuator for mobile applications10.1016/j.sna.2015.07.037 ↗
11. Enhanced Haptic Sensations Using a Novel Electrostatic Vibration Actuator with Frequency Beating Phenomenon10.1109/LRA.2020.2967298 ↗
12. Laitinen, P., Mawnpaa, J., and Mäenpää, J. (2006, January 4–5). Enabling Mobile Haptic Design: Piezoelectric Actuator Technology Properties in Hand Held Devices. 2006 IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications (HAVE 2006), Ottawa, ON, Canada.10.1109/HAVE.2006.283787 ↗
13. Johnstone, R.W., and Parameswaran, M. (2004). Electrostatic Actuators. An Introduction to Surface-Micromachining, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-8021-0 ↗
14. Schuster, J.M. (2018). Modeling and Simulation of a Novel Electrostatic Beat Actuator for Haptic Feedback in Touch Screens, Miami University.
15. Joo, Y., Shin, E.-J., Heo, Y., Park, W.-H., Yang, T.-H., and Kim, S.-Y. (2019). Development of an Electrostatic Beat Module for Various Tactile Sensations in Touch Screen Devices. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9061229 ↗
16. Feynman, R.P., Leighton, R.B., and Sands, M. (1965). The Feyn-Man Lectures on Physics, Caltech. Edu.. Feynman lectures.10.1119/1.1972241 ↗
17. Psychophysical Model for Vibrotactile Rendering in Mobile Devices10.1162/PRES_a_00011 ↗
18. Vibrotactile thresholds at the fingertip, volar forearm, large toe, and heel10.1080/08990220802045574 ↗