Surface Quality of Wood Plastic Composites as Function of Water Exposure
Source abstract
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the surface quality of experimentally manufactured wood plastic composite (WPC) samples exposed to water soaking. Eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana L.), which is one of the invasive species in Oklahoma, USA, and recycled plastic were used to manufacture WPC samples. Three types of samples, namely with 0%, 3% and 6% nano-clay were soaked in water for up to one month. Stylus-type equipment was employed to evaluate their surface roughness as a function of water exposure. Two accepted roughness parameters, average roughness (Ra) and mean peak-to-valley (Rz), were used to determine changes in the surface quality of the specimens due to water exposure. Average roughness values of 1.5 µm and 4.1 µm were determined for the samples with no clay in dry conditions and those soaked for one month in water, respectively. Corresponding values were lower in the case of those with clay in their content. Based on the findings in this work, it appears that the stylus technique can be successfully applied to such samples to quantitatively evaluate their surface quality when they are exposed to water for an extended time span. It is expected that data from this work could help to produce a better understanding of the behavior of WPCs under environmental conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Wood Treatment and Properties · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Forest Industry Engineering, Bursa Technical University, Bursa 16310, Turkey
Wood Products Engineering, Dumlupinar University, Kutahya 43100, Turkey
Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Wood-Plastic Composites in the United States
2. Opportunities for Wood/Natural Fiber-Plastic Composites in Residential and Industrial applications
3. Influence of moisture absorption on mechanical properties of wood flour polypropylene composites10.1106/UDKY-0403-626E-1H4P ↗
4. Gardner, D., Han, Y., and Song, W. (2008, January 10–12). Wood plastic composites technology trends. Proceedings of the 51st International Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology, Conception, Chile.
5. Nanoclay reinforced HDPE as a matrix for wood-plastic composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.03.004 ↗
6. Smith, P., and Bright, K.D. (1999, January 26–27). New market development for wood plastic composite decking products. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Woodfiber-Plastic Composites, Madison, WI, USA.
7. Hiziroglu, S., Kalkan, K., and Karumuri, K. (2014). Dimensional Stability and Roughness of Wood Plastic Composite Material Made from Eastern Redcedar, University of Oklahoma.
8. (2020, June 30). Available online: http://news.bio-based.eu/global-wood-plastic-composites-wpc-market-analysis-trends-industry-forecast-to-2025.
9. Properties of flat-pressed wood plastic composites containing fire retardants10.1002/app.34346 ↗
10. Smulski, S. (1997). Engineered Wood Products. A Guide for Specifiers, Designer and Users, PFS Research Foundation.
11. Turku, I., and Karki, T. (2013). Research progress in wood–plastic nanocomposites: A review. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater.10.1177/0892705713486131 ↗
12. Improved wood plastic composites through better processing10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.013 ↗
13. Natural fiber composites of high temperature thermoplastic polymer effects of coupling agents10.1002/app.11072 ↗
14. Twin screw compounding of PE-HD wood flour composites10.3139/217.1627 ↗
15. Properties of Wood Composites from Eastern Redcedar Particle Reinforced with Benzoxazine Resin/Cashew Nut Shell Liquid Copolymer10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.06.011 ↗
16. Bidwell, T.G., Engle, D., Moselay, M.E., and Masters, R.E. (2000). Invasion of Oklahoma Rangeland and Forests by Eastern Redcedar and Ashei Juniper, Division of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Oklahoma State University. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Circular E-947.
17. Wittwer, R.F. (1985, January 10). Biology of eastern redcedar. Eastern redcedar in Oklahoma. Proceedings of the Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service, Stillwater, OK, USA.
18. Particleboard manufacture from eastern redcedar
19. Yields and seasonal variation of photochemical from Juniperus species of the United States10.1016/0144-4565(87)90051-5 ↗
20. Properties of Strandboard Panels Manufactured from Eastern Redcedar10.3390/ma2030926 ↗
21. The distrubution and role of nanoclay in lignocellulose-polymer blends
22. Surface Roughness Analysis of Wood Composites: A Stylus Method
23. Mummery, L. (1991). Surface Texture Analysis the Handbook, Hommelwelke.
24. Evaluation of surface characteristics of laminated flooring10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.03.012 ↗
25. Surface characteristics of wood composites manufactured in Thailand10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.02.004 ↗
26. Surface chemistry and mechanical property changes of wood-flour/high density polyethylene composites after accelerated weathering10.1002/app.20996 ↗
27. Durability of wood flour plastic composites exposed to accelerated freeze –thaw cycling. Part 1 Rigid PVC matrix10.1002/vnl.20029 ↗
28. Influence of nanoclay on properties of HDPE/wood composites10.1002/app.27048 ↗
29. Thickness swelling and water absorption of WPC after immersion in cold and boiling water10.1007/s00107-013-0695-2 ↗