Detectability of Osseous Lesions with a Pre-Programmed Low-Dose Protocol for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Source abstract
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare the diagnostic reliability of a pre-set, manufacturer-specific, low-dose mode against a standard-dose mode in the detection of four different osseous lesions in the mandible with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Four types of lesions (periapical lesion, extended periodontal gap, recession of the buccal lamella, sequestrum/fracture) were prepared on 40 pig mandibles. CBCT images were obtained from each mandible, with both the low-dose and standard-dose modes using the Orthophos SL CBCT device (Dentsply-Sirona, Bensheim, Germany). Twelve assessors quantitatively (detection of lesions) and qualitatively (assessment of detectability) evaluated the CBCT images in SIDEXIS 4 (Dentsply-Sirona) using a study-specific digital examination tool. A correct diagnosis was achieved in almost 71% (LD: 70.8%; SD: 70.9%) of 1920 lesions, without a statistically significant difference between the low-dose and standard-dose mode. This finding was consistent across all four lesion types. In conclusion, while low-dose mode and standard-dose mode CBCT scans performed similarly in the detection of four prepared lesions of the mandible, the former may be a promising, user-friendly alternative method of obtaining radiation-optimized, three-dimensional images in accordance with the As Low As Diagnostically Acceptable (ALADA) principle.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental Radiography and Imaging · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Clinic of Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstrasse 11, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland
Funding
Dentsply Sirona
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Optimization of exposure parameters in dental cone beam computed tomography using a 3-step approach10.1016/j.oooo.2018.08.004 ↗
2. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: Technique improvement and low-dose protocols10.1007/s11547-017-0758-2 ↗
3. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: Preliminary results10.1007/s003300050586 ↗
4. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: Current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research10.1111/prd.12161 ↗
5. Diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for periodontal lesions10.1007/s00784-013-1106-0 ↗
6. Detection of periodontal bone loss using cone beam CT and intraoral radiography10.1259/dmfr/13676777 ↗
7. Do CBCT scans alter surgical treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative surgical diagnosis using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.025 ↗
8. Dental cone beam CT: A review10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.004 ↗
9. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005 ↗
10. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: A systematic review focusing on guidelines, indications, and radiation dose risks10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g1.4 ↗
11. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry10.1259/bjr/31419627 ↗
12. An analysis of effective dose optimization and its impact on image quality and diagnostic efficacy relating to dental cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)10.61872/sdj-2018-04-395 ↗
13. Novel low-dose protocols using cone beam computed tomography in dental medicine: A review focusing on indications, limitations, and future possibilities10.1007/s00784-019-02907-y ↗
14. Cone beam CT: A current overview of devices10.1259/dmfr.20120443 ↗
15. Dose optimization for assessment of periodontal structures in cone beam CT examinations10.1259/dmfr.20160311 ↗
16. Cone-beam computed tomography: Time to move from ALARA to ALADA10.5624/isd.2015.45.4.263 ↗
17. The Image Gently in Dentistry campaign: Promotion of responsible use of maxillofacial radiology in dentistry for children10.1016/j.oooo.2014.06.001 ↗
18. The miniature pig: A useful large animal model for dental and orofacial research10.1111/j.1601-0825.2006.01337.x ↗
19. Animal models for periodontal regeneration and peri-implant responses10.1111/prd.12052 ↗
20. Dentsply Sirona (2018). Orthophos SL: Instruction manual, Dentsply Sirona.
21. R Core Team (2015). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Computer Program], R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/.
22. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed EffectsModels10.18637/jss.v082.i13 ↗
23. Lenth, R., and Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means [Computer Program] (2020, June 09). R Package Version 1.2.3. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.
24. Hartig, F., and DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level/Mixed) Regression Models [Computer Program] (2020, June 09). R Package Version 0.2.4. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa.
25. Consortium, S. Comparison of cone beam CT device and field of view for the detection of simulated periapical bone lesions10.1259/dmfr/19322177 ↗
26. Ludlow, J.B. (2014). Dosimetry of Orthophos SL CBCT Unit with Low-Dose Protocol, North Carolina Oral Health Institute. unpublished.
27. Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography10.1007/s100060000169 ↗
28. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: Effect of field of view and angle of rotation10.1259/bjr.20130654 ↗
29. Effective dose of dental CBCT-a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units10.1259/dmfr.20140197 ↗
30. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.023 ↗
31. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam computed tomography in mandibular molars for analysis of anatomical landmarks before apical surgery10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.014 ↗
32. Accuracy of periapical radiography and CBCT in endodontic evaluation
33. Precision of cone beam CT to assess periodontal bone defects: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1259/dmfr.20170084 ↗
34. Diagnostic reliability of low dose multidetector CT and cone beam CT in maxillofacial trauma-an experimental blinded and randomized study10.1259/dmfr.20170423 ↗
35. Effect of Milliamperage Reduction on Pre-surgical Implant Planning Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography by Surgeons of Varying Experience10.1007/s12663-017-1075-y ↗
36. Optimization of cone beam CT exposure for pre-surgical evaluation of the implant site10.1259/dmfr/16421849 ↗
37. Basic training requirements for the use of dental CBCT by dentists: A position paper prepared by the European Academy of DentoMaxilloFacial Radiology10.1259/dmfr.20130291 ↗