Superpixel Segmentation of Hyperspectral Images Based on Entropy and Mutual Information
Source abstract
Abstract
Superpixel segmentation (SS) methods have been proven to be feasible in improving the performance of hybrid algorithms on hyperspectral images (HSIs). In this paper, a superpixel segmentation algorithm based on the information measures with color histogram driving (IM-CHD) was proposed. First, Shannon entropy was applied to measure the image information and preliminarily select spectral bands. Mutual information (MI) is derived from the concept of entropy and measures the statistical dependence between two random variables. Also, MI can effectively identify the redundant spectral bands. Therefore, in this paper, both MI and color matching functions (CMF) were used to select the most useful spectral bands. Second, the selected spectral bands were combined into a false color image containing the main spectral information. A local optimization algorithm named “hill climbing” was used to achieve the superpixel segmentation. Finally, parameter selection experiments and comparative experiments were performed on two hyperspectral data sets. The experimental results showed that the IM-CHD method was more efficient and accurate than other state-of-the-art methods.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Remote-Sensing Image Classification · Remote Sensing and Land Use · Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Test and Control Engineering, School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Advances in spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral images10.1109/JPROC.2012.2197589 ↗
2. An efficient method for supervised hyperspectral band selection10.1109/LGRS.2010.2053516 ↗
3. Martínez-Usó, A., Pla, F., and García-Sevilla, P. (2006, January 14–17). Automatic band selection in multispectral images using mutual information-based clustering. Proceedings of the Iberoamerican Congress on Pattern Recognition, Cancun, Mexico.10.1007/11892755_67 ↗
4. Wang, B., Wang, X., and Chen, Z. (2015). Spatial mutual information based hyperspectral band selection for classification. Sci. World J., 2015.10.1155/2015/630918 ↗
5. Extracting spectral contrast in Landsat Thematic Mapper image data using selective principal component analysis
6. A novel geometry-based feature-selection technique for hyperspectral imagery10.1109/LGRS.2006.887142 ↗
7. Chen, Y., Nasrabadi, N.M., and Tran, T.D. (2010). Sparsity-based classification of hyperspectral imagery. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. IEEE.10.1109/IGARSS.2010.5649357 ↗
8. Design goals and solutions for display of hyperspectral images10.1109/TGRS.2005.857623 ↗
9. Acito, N., Corsini, G., and Diani, M. (2003, January 21–25). An unsupervised algorithm for hyperspectral image segmentation based on the Gaussian mixture model. Proceedings of the IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Toulouse, France.
10. Hyperspectral image segmentation using a new spectral unmixing-based binary partition tree representation10.1109/TIP.2014.2329767 ↗
11. A novel framework for MR image segmentation and quantification by using MedGA10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.04.016 ↗
12. Jiayin, L., Zhenmin, T., Ying, C., and Guoxing, W. (2017). Local competition-based superpixel segmentation algorithm in remote sensing. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17061364 ↗
13. Learning a classification model for segmentation
14. Liu, M.Y., Tuzel, O., Ramalingam, S., and Chellappa, S. (2011). Entropy rate superpixel segmentation. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit.10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995323 ↗
15. Bergh, M.V.D., Boix, X., Roig, G., Capitani, B.D., and Gool, L.V. (2012). SEEDS: Superpixels Extracted via Energy-Driven Sampling. European Conference on Computer Vision, Springer.
16. Zhang, X., Chew, S.E., Xu, Z., and Cahill, N.D. (2015). SLIC superpixels for efficient graph-based dimensionality reduction of hyperspectral imagery. SPIE.10.1117/12.2176911 ↗
17. Xu, Q., Fu, P., Sun, Q., and Wang, T. (2019). A Fast Region Growing Based Superpixel Segmentation for Hyperspectral Image Classification. Proceedings of the Chinese Conference on Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision (PRCV), Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-31723-2_66 ↗
18. Combining split-and-merge and multi-seed region growing algorithms for uterine fibroid segmentation in MRgFUS treatments10.1007/s11517-015-1404-6 ↗
19. Principal component analysis for hyperspectral image classification
20. Zhang, Y., Jiang, X., Wang, X., and Cai, Z. (2019). Spectral-Spatial Hyperspectral Image Classification with Superpixel Pattern and Extreme Learning Machine. Remote Sens., 11.10.3390/rs11171983 ↗
21. A constrained band selection method based on information measures for spectral image color visualization10.1109/TGRS.2011.2158319 ↗
22. Lin, L., Chen, C., Yang, J., and Zhang, S. (2019). Deep Transfer HSI Classification Method Based on Information Measure and Optimal Neighborhood Noise Reduction. Electronics, 8.10.3390/electronics8101112 ↗
23. Hyperspectral image data analysis as a high dimensional signal processing problem10.1109/79.974718 ↗
24. A mathematical theory of communication10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x ↗
25. Bell, A.J. (2020, February 12). The co-information lattice. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation: ICA. Available online:https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/25a0/cd8d486d5ffd204485685226f189e6eadd4d.pdf.
26. Shaw, M.Q., and Fairchild, M.D. (2001). Evaluating the 1931 CIE Color Matching Functions. Proc. AIC, 316–329.10.1002/col.10077 ↗
27. Clustering-based hyperspectral band selection using information measures
28. Lin, L., Yang, J., and Zhou, Z. (2018). Superpixel segmentation for hyperspectral images based on false color composition with color histogram driving. Int. J. Remote Sens., 307–331.10.1080/01431161.2018.1513181 ↗
29. Masra, S.M.W., Pang, P.K., Muhammad, M.S., and Kipli, K. (2012, January 3–4). Application of particle swarm optimization in histogram equalization for image enhancement. Proceedings of the Humanities, Science and Engineering (CHUSER), Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.10.1109/CHUSER.2012.6504327 ↗
30. Semi-supervised graph-based hyperspectral image classification10.1109/TGRS.2007.895416 ↗
31. Palmason, J.A., Benediktsson, J.A., Sveinsson, J.R., and Chanussot, J. (2005, January 29–29). Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas using morphological preprocessing and independent component analysis. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Seoul, Korea.
32. Veksler, O., Boykov, Y., and Mehrani, P. (2010, January 5–11). Superpixels and Supervoxels in an Energy Optimization Framework. Proceedings of the Computer Vision—ECCV 2010—11th European Conference on Computer Vision, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.10.1007/978-3-642-15555-0_16 ↗
33. David, W., and Dunteman, G.H. (2020, February 12). Principal Components Analysis. Available online:https://books.google.com.ph/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=Pzwt-CMMt4UC&oi=fnd&pg=PA5&dq=Principal+Components+Analysis&ots=igfoyzhMg1&sig=QceIG76XG1r3HJ7mzvAC_s22gw8&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Principal%20Components%20Analysis&f=false.
34. Linear Spectral Clustering Superpixel10.1109/TIP.2017.2651389 ↗