journal article·2020-01-01Open access

Delay and Energy Consumption Analysis of Frame Slotted ALOHA variants for Massive Data Collection in Internet-of-Things Scenarios

Francisco Vázquez-Gallego, Pere Tuset-Peiró, Luis Alonso, Jesus Alonso-Zarate

Applied Sciences· Volume 10· Issue 1

Abstract

This paper models and evaluates three FSA-based (Frame Slotted ALOHA) MAC (Medium Access Control) protocols, namely, FSA-ACK (FSA with ACKnowledgements), FSA-FBP (FSA with FeedBack Packets) and DFSA (Dynamic FSA). The protocols are modeled using an AMC (Absorbing Markov Chain), which allows to derive analytic expressions for the average packet delay, as well as the energy consumption of both the network coordinator and the end-devices. The results, based on computer simulations, show that the analytic model is accurate and outline the benefits of DFSA. In terms of delay, DFSA provides a reduction of 17% (FSA-FBP) and 32% (FSA-ACK), whereas in terms of energy consumption DFSA provides savings of 23% (FSA-FBP) and 28% (FSA-ACK) for the coordinator and savings of 50% (FSA-FBP) and 24% (FSA-ACK) for end-devices. Finally, the paper provides insights on how to configure each FSA variant depending on the network parameters, i.e., depending on the number of end-devices, to minimize delay and energy expenditure. This is specially interesting for massive data collection in IoT (Internet-of-Things) scenarios, which typically rely on FSA-based protocols and where the operation has to be optimized to support a large number of devices with stringent energy consumption requirements.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: IoT Networks and Protocols · IoT and Edge/Fog Computing · Wireless Body Area Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

M2M Communications Department, Centre Tecnològic de Telecomunicacions de Catalunya (CTTC/CERCA), 08060 Castelldefels, Barcelona, Spain

Wireless Networks (WiNe) Research Laboratory, Internet Interdisciplinary Institute (IN3), Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), 08060 Castelldefels, Barcelona, Spain

Escola d’Enginyeria de Telecomunicació i Aeroespacial de Castelldefels (EETAC), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), 08060 Castelldefels, Barcelona, Spain

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095 ↗
2. Edge Computing: Vision and Challenges10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198 ↗
3. A Survey on Internet of Things: Architecture, Enabling Technologies, Security and Privacy, and Applications10.1109/JIOT.2017.2683200 ↗
4. Towards the Implementation of IoT for Environmental Condition Monitoring in Homes10.1109/JSEN.2013.2263379 ↗
5. Internet of Things for Smart Cities10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328 ↗
6. The Internet of Things for Health Care: A Comprehensive Survey10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2437951 ↗
7. Internet of Things in Industries: A Survey10.1109/TII.2014.2300753 ↗
8. Low Power Wide Area Networks: An Overview10.1109/COMST.2017.2652320 ↗
9. Standardized Low-Power Wireless Communication Technologies for Distributed Sensing Applications10.3390/s140202663 ↗
10. Standardized Protocol Stack for the Internet of (Important) Things10.1109/SURV.2012.111412.00158 ↗
11. MAC Essentials for Wireless Sensor Networks10.1109/SURV.2010.020510.00058 ↗
12. A Survey of MAC Layer Issues and Protocols for Machine-to-Machine Communications10.1109/JIOT.2015.2394438 ↗
13. Understanding the Limits of LoRaWAN10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600613 ↗
14. Improving Reliability and Scalability of LoRaWANs Through Lightweight Scheduling10.1109/JIOT.2018.2815150 ↗
15. Watteyne, T., Lanzisera, S., Mehta, A., and Pister, K.S.J. (2010, January 23–27). Mitigating Multipath Fading through Channel Hopping in Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Cape Town, South Africa.10.1109/ICC.2010.5502548 ↗
16. De Armas, J., Tuset, P., Chang, T., Adelantado, F., Watteyne, T., and Vilajosana, X. (2016, January 7–9). Determinism through Path Diversity: Why Packet Replication Makes Sense. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS), Ostrawva, Czech Republic.10.1109/INCoS.2016.105 ↗
17. Tuset-Peiró, P., Vázquez-Gallego, F., Muñoz, J., Watteyne, T., Alonso-Zarate, J., and Vilajosana, X. (2019). Experimental Interference Robustness Evaluation of IEEE 802.15.4-2015 OQPSK-DSSS and SUN-OFDM Physical Layers for Industrial Communications. Electronics, 8.10.3390/electronics8091045 ↗
18. Vázquez-Gallego, F., Alonso-Zarate, J., and Alonso, L. (2013, January 9–13). Energy and delay analysis of contention resolution mechanisms for machine-to-machine networks based on low-power WiFi. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/ICC.2013.6654860 ↗
19. Modeling and Analysis of Reservation Frame Slotted-ALOHA in Wireless Machine-to-Machine Area Networks for Data Collection10.3390/s150203911 ↗
20. Dynamic Frame Length ALOHA10.1109/TCOM.1983.1095854 ↗
21. Vogt, H. (2002). Efficient Object Identification with Passive RFID Tags. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Springer. Pervasive ’02.10.1007/3-540-45866-2_9 ↗
22. (2016). 802.15.4-2015 - IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks, IEEE. Revision of IEEE Std 802.15.4-2011.10.1109/TITB.2011.2166649 ↗
23. Texas Instruments (2007). CC2520 Datasheet: 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4/Zigbee RF Transceiver (SWRS068), Texas Instruments.