Time-Dependent Probabilistic Model for Hierarchical Structure in Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Source abstract
Abstract
Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) is a structured technique for identifying risks that may occur during a given stage of a system’s life cycle. However, the use of the risk priority number (RPN) in traditional FMEA results in difficulties with regard to quantification of the degree of risk in the hierarchical failure structure. This study proposes the use of a hierarchical time-dependent FMEA approach to overcome the limitations encountered during the implementation of traditional FMEA approaches. In place of the RPN, a probabilistic loss model is developed under a hierarchical structure considering the elapsed time from the failure-cause (FC) to the system failure. By assuming exponential and case functions for each occurrence and detection time instant, the expected loss corresponding to each FC can be evaluated. As a result of the practical application of the time-dependent probabilistic model through the numerical example, we could reasonably evaluate the risk from the cause of failure in the hierarchical structure in terms of economic loss.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Risk and Safety Analysis · Reliability and Maintenance Optimization · Software Reliability and Analysis Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Research & Business Foundation, Dong-A University, Busan 49315, Korea
Department of Natural Science, Korea Naval Academy, Changwon 51704, Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. General model for the risk priority number in failure mode and effects analysis10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.010 ↗
2. A systematic approach for diagnosing service failure: Service-specific FMEA and grey relational analysis approach10.1016/j.mcm.2011.07.042 ↗
3. Application of FMEA to an automotive leaf spring manufacturing organization10.1108/17542731211226772 ↗
4. An extension to Fuzzy Developed Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.009 ↗
5. A risk evaluation and prioritization method for FMEA with prospect theory and Choquet integral10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.009 ↗
6. Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010 ↗
7. Risk evaluation using a novel hybrid method based on FMEA, extended MULTIMOORA, and AHP methods under fuzzy environment10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.018 ↗
8. A hybrid risk analysis method for a yacht fuel system safety10.1016/j.ssci.2015.05.010 ↗
9. Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.013 ↗
10. Fuzzy based risk prioritisation in an auto LPG dispensing station10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.011 ↗
11. Using cost based FMEA to enhance reliability and serviceability10.1016/j.aei.2004.07.002 ↗
12. Failure mode and effects analysis based on fuzzy utility cost estimation10.1108/02656710710826216 ↗
13. Cost-oriented failure mode and effects analysis10.1108/02656710810873871 ↗
14. Probabilistic priority numbers for failure modes and effects analysis10.1108/02656711211216171 ↗
15. A Dempster-Shafer Theory-based approach to the Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) under epistemic uncertainty: Application to the propulsion system of a fishing vessel10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.018 ↗
16. New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method10.1016/j.ress.2017.06.014 ↗
17. Failure modes, mechanisms and effect analysis on temperature redundant sensor stage10.1016/j.ress.2018.08.013 ↗
18. Improving risk evaluation in FMEA with a hybrid multiple criteria decision making method10.1108/IJQRM-10-2013-0169 ↗
19. An extended VIKOR method based on entropy measure for the failure modes risk assessment—A case study of the geothermal power plant (GPP)10.1016/j.ssci.2016.10.006 ↗
20. A novel failure mode and effect analysis model for machine tool risk analysis10.1016/j.ress.2018.11.018 ↗
21. HSE risk prioritization using robust DEA-FMEA approach with undesirable outputs: A study of automotive parts industry in Iran10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.015 ↗
22. An expected loss model for FMEA under periodic monitoring of failure causes
23. Risk Evaluation Based on the Hierarchical Time Delay Model in FMEA10.7469/JKSQM.2016.44.2.373 ↗
24. Fuzzy methodology applied to Probabilistic Safety Assessment for digital system in nuclear power plants10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.06.044 ↗
25. System failure behavior and maintenance decision making using, RCA, FMEA and FM10.1108/13552511011030336 ↗
26. Criticality Assessment Models for Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis Using Fuzzy Logic10.1109/TR.2010.2103672 ↗
27. Fuzzy rule-based Bayesian reasoning approach for prioritization of failures in FMEA10.1109/TR.2008.928208 ↗
28. Modified failure mode and effects analysis using approximate reasoning10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00179-5 ↗
29. Utility Priority Number Evaluation for FMEA10.1007/s11668-007-9060-2 ↗
30. Risk evaluation of green components to hazardous substance using FMEA and FAHP10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.031 ↗
31. ANP/RPN: A Multi Criteria Evaluation of the Risk Priority Number10.1002/qre.1217 ↗
32. Improving failure analysis efficiency by combining FTA and FMEA in a recursive manner10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.024 ↗
33. MAFMA: Multi-attribute failure mode analysis10.1108/02656710010353885 ↗
34. An integrated structural framework to cost-based FMECA: The priority-cost FMECA10.1016/j.ress.2008.09.009 ↗
35. Risk Evaluation in FMEA when the Failure Severity Depends on the Detection Time10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.4.136 ↗
36. Safety analysis methods and applications at the design stage of new product development-Introducing the FMFEA and S-H Matrix Method
37. Risk evaluation of failure modes due to hierarchic failure causes in fmea
38. A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: A real-world case10.1016/j.ress.2017.09.017 ↗
39. Yu, S., Liu, J., Yang, Q., and Pan, M. (2011, January 12–15). A comparison of FMEA, AFMEA and FTA. Proceedings of the 2011 9th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety, Guiyang, China.10.1109/ICRMS.2011.5979423 ↗
40. A Table of Integrals of the Exponential Integral